Overview

Title

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 765 West Old Route 66 in Ash Fork, Arizona, as the Fayrene Hume Post Office Building.

ELI5 AI

Imagine a building where people send and get letters and packages, called a post office. A new idea is to call this post office in Ash Fork, Arizona, the "Fayrene Hume Post Office Building." This would be like giving the post office a special name to honor someone.

Summary AI

H.R. 9891 proposes naming a United States Postal Service facility at 765 West Old Route 66 in Ash Fork, Arizona, as the "Fayrene Hume Post Office Building." If enacted, any mention of this facility in U.S. laws, maps, or other official documents will use this new designation. The bill was introduced by Mr. Crane along with Representatives Biggs and Gosar and referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability.

Published

2024-10-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-10-01
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9891ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
247
Pages:
2
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 101
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 9
Entities: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.02
Average Sentence Length:
30.88
Token Entropy:
4.27
Readability (ARI):
16.36

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill in question, H.R. 9891, is a straightforward legislative proposal aimed at designating the United States Postal Service facility located at 765 West Old Route 66 in Ash Fork, Arizona, as the "Fayrene Hume Post Office Building." This involves officially renaming the facility to honor Fayrene Hume. Any references to this Postal Service location in future U.S. laws, maps, or documents will adopt this new designation.

Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from this bill:

  1. Financial Implications: The bill does not address potential costs associated with renaming the post office. These could include expenses related to updating signage, maps, or official records. While such costs may be nominal, the omission suggests a lack of comprehensive planning regarding financial impacts.

  2. Lack of Justification: The bill does not provide any background or reasoning for why this particular facility is being renamed after Fayrene Hume. Without context or justification, the decision might appear to some as favoring an individual without clear rationale.

  3. Clarity and Rationale: The language is clear and straightforward; however, the impact or reasons behind the designation are not. Insight into such decisions is crucial for holding representatives accountable and understanding the motivations behind legislative acts.

  4. Equity and Public Interest: There is no assessment of how renaming the post office building serves the public interest or benefits a specific community or group. As a result, there may be concerns regarding the equity and inclusivity of this decision.

Impact on the Public

Broad Public Impact: For the general public, the renaming of a postal facility is unlikely to directly affect day-to-day life except for those who interact with or rely on that specific post office. Nevertheless, the inability to see a clear reason or benefit from such legislative actions might contribute to a sense of disconnect or lack of transparency in government decisions.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders:

  • Local Community: The impact may be more significant locally, particularly for those in Ash Fork, Arizona. Residents might have a strong connection to Fayrene Hume, and the renaming could serve as a tribute or acknowledgment of her contributions to the community.

  • Family and Affiliates of Fayrene Hume: For the family and associates of Fayrene Hume, this gesture might have personal significance, reinforcing their connection to the community and recognizing Hume's legacy.

  • Ethical and Political Observers: The absence of rationale might be scrutinized by those concerned with ethical transparency and political equity. In such cases, stakeholders might advocate for clearer criteria and processes for naming public entities, ensuring community involvement and justification.

While the bill primarily impacts local stakeholders by honoring an individual in a specific location, the lack of detailed justifications and potential oversight of associated costs could spark broader discussions on transparency and public policy processes.

Issues

  • There is no mention of any costs associated with renaming the post office building, which could involve expenses such as updating signage, maps, and official documents. This oversight could have financial implications. (Section 1)

  • The section does not provide justification for the renaming of the facility, which could imply favoring an individual if the reason for designation is not explained. This lack of transparency might raise ethical or political concerns. (Section 1)

  • The language used is straightforward, but the impact or rationale behind the designation is unclear. Understanding the reasons behind such decisions is crucial for accountability. (Section 1)

  • No assessment is given as to whether this renaming serves the public interest or benefits a specific community or group, which might raise concerns about the equity and inclusivity of the decision. (Section 1)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Fayrene Hume Post Office Building Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States Postal Service facility at 765 West Old Route 66 in Ash Fork, Arizona, is officially named the “Fayrene Hume Post Office Building.” Any mention of this location in U.S. laws or documents will refer to it by this new name.