Overview
Title
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of higher education, as a condition of participation in programs under title IV of such Act, to establish a policy to award posthumous degrees to certain deceased students, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
Mel’s Law wants colleges to give a special diploma to students who have died before they could finish school, but only if they were doing well in their classes.
Summary AI
H. R. 9857, known as "Mel’s Law," aims to modify the Higher Education Act of 1965 by requiring colleges and universities to have a policy in place for awarding degrees to students who have passed away before finishing their studies. To receive the degree after death, the student must have been enrolled in a degree program and was meeting the academic standards necessary for graduation at the time of their death. The law states that accreditation agencies should not consider the number of posthumous degrees an institution has awarded when evaluating the institution. This change is set to take effect one year after the law is enacted.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as "Mel's Law," seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965. The primary aim is to require institutions participating in Title IV programs—those that help manage financial aid for students—to establish policies for awarding posthumous degrees to students who pass away before completing their degree programs. According to the bill, to be eligible for a posthumous degree, students must have been in good academic standing at the time of their death. The bill also states that accrediting bodies should not consider the number of posthumous degrees awarded by an institution when evaluating its performance.
Significant Issues
There are several concerns associated with this bill. Firstly, it does not allocate any funding to assist institutions in implementing these changes, potentially imposing financial burdens, especially on smaller or less well-resourced institutions. The bill also lacks specificity in defining "academic standing consistent with graduation requirements," putting substantial discretion in the hands of each institution. This could result in uneven application of the law across different colleges and universities.
Furthermore, while the bill mentions that the number of posthumous degrees should not affect accreditation evaluations, it remains unclear how this might influence overall assessments of an institution’s performance and standards. Additionally, the timeframe of one year for institutions to adapt to these new requirements might be challenging, particularly for those with limited resources. Lastly, there is no detailed procedure outlined for informing families about the policy or helping them apply for degrees posthumously, which could lead to inconsistencies in how the law is applied.
Public Impact
Broadly, the impact of this bill could be seen as compassionate, offering a degree of closure or recognition to families who lose loved ones before they have the chance to graduate. It highlights a commitment to honoring the hard work and dedication of students, even posthumously. However, the lack of clear guidelines and financial support could complicate its implementation.
Stakeholder Impact
Different stakeholders might be affected by this legislation in varied ways. For families who lose a student under such circumstances, receiving a posthumous degree can serve as an important acknowledgment of the student's efforts and potential. Students themselves might feel reassured knowing that their efforts could still be honored, should an unforeseen tragedy occur.
On the other hand, educational institutions may face challenges adapting to the new requirements, especially without additional resources or clear guidelines. Smaller institutions could find themselves particularly strained if they are required to allocate resources to develop and implement a new policy swiftly. Furthermore, accrediting agencies may need to adjust their evaluation frameworks to align with the new provisions, which could add complexity to their processes.
Overall, while this bill addresses a compassionate concern, the execution, funding, and clarity of its implementation details will significantly influence its success and acceptance among stakeholders.
Issues
The bill does not specify any funding or resources to assist institutions in implementing the policy to award posthumous degrees, creating a potential financial burden for institutions, especially those with limited resources. This is detailed in Section 2.
The lack of detail on what constitutes 'academic standing consistent with the requirements for graduation' leaves significant discretion to institutions, potentially leading to inconsistent application across different institutions and possible legal challenges. This is referenced in Section 2(a).
The bill states accreditation standards should not consider the number of posthumous degrees awarded, but it does not clarify how this might affect the overall evaluation of an institution's performance or standards, creating an ambiguity in the implementation. This is mentioned in Section 2(b).
The effective date being set one year after enactment may not provide adequate time for institutions to develop and implement new policies, particularly for those with limited administrative resources. This concern is relevant to Section 2(c).
The bill does not explain how families of deceased students are to be informed about or apply for posthumous degrees, potentially leading to confusion and inconsistent communication practices. This lack is noted under Section 2.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the act, stating that it may be called "Mel’s Law."
2. Requirement to award posthumous degrees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text details a law that requires colleges and universities to award degrees to students who die before they can graduate, as long as they were in good academic standing. It also specifies that accrediting bodies should not consider how many posthumous degrees an institution awards when reviewing the institution's accreditation, and these changes will take effect one year after the law is enacted.