Overview
Title
To authorize competitive grants for the establishment of HOPE Accounts Pilot Projects and HOPE Action Plans Pilot Projects, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9845, called the "HOPE Act of 2024," is like a special plan to help people with less money. It wants to give them new ways to save money and make their lives better by teaming up with big groups that help others, but it needs to make sure it does this fairly and checks if the plan is working well.
Summary AI
H.R. 9845, known as the "HOPE Act of 2024", aims to establish pilot projects to support low-income individuals and families in the United States. These projects will focus on creating HOPE Accounts that help people deposit paychecks, access benefits and savings, and use new technologies for financial management. The bill also promotes partnerships with government and nonprofit organizations to enhance economic opportunities for target populations, which include people in poverty, those facing food insecurity, and individuals transitioning from foster care. The bill allocates funds for these initiatives and requires annual reports to evaluate their effectiveness.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, formally known as the "Health, Opportunity, and Personal Empowerment Act of 2024," or "HOPE Act of 2024," seeks to authorize competitive grants for pilot projects aimed at aiding low-income individuals. These initiatives focus on establishing HOPE Accounts, which are financial tools coupled with technology to enhance access to savings and public benefits. Additionally, the bill proposes HOPE Action Plans, which encourage partnerships between beneficiaries and organizations to promote long-term financial goals. The Act allocates funds from 2025 to 2030 to support these projects and contracts, aiming to alleviate poverty through simplified access to benefits and strategic partnerships.
Summary of Significant Issues
Ambiguity in Definitions and Implementation:
The bill introduces broad definitions, particularly the term "eligible entity," which may lead to ambiguity about which organizations can apply for grants. This could potentially result in favoritism or misuse, impacting how resources are distributed.
Privacy and Security Concerns:
Sections detailing the use of technology lack specific standards or oversight mechanisms regarding data protection, raising concerns about the adequacy of privacy safeguards for personal and financial information.
Complex Language and Lack of Transparency:
The bill's technical language may pose comprehension challenges for the general public. This complexity could limit public engagement and invite misunderstandings about the bill's intentions and execution.
Potential for Favoritism and Bias:
Criteria for awarding grants and contracts are not clearly benchmarked, risking bias towards entities with greater resources or existing capabilities, sidelining smaller or local organizations.
Inconsistencies in Contract Sizes:
The large variance in contract sizes, from $200,000 to $4,500,000, could result in disparities in project scope and effectiveness, leading to inconsistencies in outcomes.
Methodology for Fund Allocation to Persistent Poverty Counties:
The bill mandates a minimum of 10% allocation to counties with persistent poverty but does not clarify the methodology for selection and distribution, which could lead to implementation challenges.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the public might benefit from the increased efficiency and access to government assistance programs through digital technology, especially those in need of financial or food security solutions. However, the bill might also inadvertently create challenges due to its complexity and lack of clarity, particularly in its execution and monitoring processes.
For specific stakeholders, non-profits and state agencies could find new opportunities through grant programs. Yet, without clear guidelines, smaller organizations might struggle to compete with larger entities for funding. Low-income individuals stand to benefit from improved access to banking and support systems, but privacy concerns could become a deterrent if not adequately addressed.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Low-Income Individuals:
This demographic is at the heart of the bill's objectives. If successfully implemented, the projects could provide streamlined access to essential services and financial tools, potentially improving their economic conditions. However, inadequate privacy protections might pose a risk to their personal information security.
Nonprofits and Local Governments:
The bill presents opportunities for nonprofits and local governments to partner on funded projects. Successful organizations could enhance their roles in community support systems. Conversely, without defined criteria for preference or selection, smaller entities might be overshadowed by those with existing resources and expertise.
Government Departments:
The allocation of responsibilities across multiple federal departments posits an integrated approach to social welfare. However, without specific oversight mechanisms and metrics, measuring success and accountability might be challenging, affecting the efficient deployment of resources and intended benefits.
Overall, while the HOPE Act of 2024 presents an ambitious framework to address poverty through technology and partnerships, its success hinges on clarifying definitions, enhancing privacy measures, defining clear criteria for fund allocation, and ensuring comprehensive public understanding and engagement.
Financial Assessment
The "HOPE Act of 2024," or H.R. 9845, proposes a range of initiatives aimed at supporting low-income individuals and households. A central feature of the bill is its focus on financial allocation to various projects and entities.
Financial Allocations Overview
The bill outlines allocations for grants aimed at establishing pilot projects known as HOPE Accounts and HOPE Action Plans. Grants under Section 4 are to range in amounts from $250,000 to $3,000,000, and the contracts under Section 5 are set between $200,000 to $4,500,000. These allocations are intended to support projects proportionately based on geographical size, project complexity, and the number of participants.
Additionally, the bill authorizes the appropriation of funds for fiscal years 2025 through 2030. Specifically:
- $10,000,000 to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development with a breakdown of $500,000 internally for planning and overseeing, and $9,500,000 for grants.
- $10,000,000 to the Secretary of Agriculture similarly divided.
- $15,000,000 to the Secretary of Health and Human Services with $500,000 for internal management, $9,500,000 for grants, and $5,000,000 for technology innovation contracts.
Relation to Identified Issues
The broad range of grant and contract values may lead to inconsistencies or disparities in the scope and results of projects, particularly noted in the issue regarding the contract sizes in Section 5. Without clear, standardized evaluation criteria, there is a risk of uneven distribution and execution of funds which could undermine the objectives of fostering uniform economic empowerment.
Furthermore, the preference in sections of the bill for allocating funds to specific pilot projects could invite favoritism or bias, potentially disadvantaging smaller, local organizations that may not have the resources to compete on equal footing, thereby impacting the fair distribution of financial resources.
Additionally, the authorization of appropriated funds includes a stipulation for allocating a minimum of 10 percent to persistent poverty counties. While this aims to ensure targeting of needed resources, the lack of a clear methodology for distribution may lead to challenges and perceptions of unfairness, as noted in the issues.
Conclusion
In summary, H.R. 9845 makes significant financial commitments to develop innovative pilot projects and services intended to benefit low-income populations. However, the bill's approach to financial allocations, without robust mechanisms for oversight and evaluation, could result in inefficiencies or inequities. Addressing these concerns requires clear guidelines and transparent processes for award distribution and project accountability.
Issues
The broad definition of 'eligible entity' in Section 3 may lead to ambiguity regarding which entities can qualify, creating potential for misuse or favoritism in grant distribution.
The privacy and security concerns in Section 4 and Section 5 are significant, as there are no specific standards or oversight mechanisms mentioned, raising questions about the adequacy of data protection.
The lack of a clearly defined oversight or evaluation mechanism in Section 7 could result in inefficient use of resources and lack of accountability in the implementation of pilot projects and contracts.
The complex language and technical nature of the bill throughout, particularly in Sections 4 and 5, may make it difficult for the general public to understand and engage with, potentially leading to misunderstandings or mistrust.
The potential for favoritism or bias in granting preferences to certain pilot projects as outlined in Section 4, without clear benchmarks, could disadvantage smaller or local organizations.
The section on 'Maintenance of effort and nondisplacement of workers' in Section 6 lacks specific guidance on implementation measures, leaving room for unintended consequences or misinterpretation.
The substantial range in contract sizes from $200,000 to $4,500,000 in Section 5 could lead to inconsistencies or disparities in project scope and results.
Section 5 allows exceptions for limited access to client data by contractors, which poses risks if terms are not clearly defined and privacy safeguards are insufficient.
In Section 8, the allocation of a minimum of 10 percent of funds to 'persistent poverty counties' without clear methodology may lead to implementation challenges and questions of fairness.
The potential for wasteful spending as indicated in Section 2, where no specific funding amounts or implementers are mentioned, poses a risk of misuse or inefficiency.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Health, Opportunity, and Personal Empowerment Act of 2024,” and it can also be referred to as the “HOPE Act of 2024.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has identified persistent challenges faced by low-income individuals in the United States, highlighting issues such as food insecurity, poverty, and barriers to accessing government assistance programs. Despite the availability of technology and nonprofit support, many eligible individuals struggle with complex application processes, underutilized aid programs, and repeated bureaucratic hurdles, underscoring the need for simplified access to benefits through digital means and policy reform.
Money References
- As a result, many low-income people are actually unaware of all the government benefits for which they are eligible, reducing the amount of help going to individuals in need by tens of billions of dollars every year.
- According to the Pew Research Center, 79 percent of adult individuals with incomes of $30,000 or less have a smart phone as of 2023 (not because a smart phone is a luxury but because it is an essential tool of learning and work in modern United States) but they rarely can use these devices to apply for benefits.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms used in the Act, such as an “eligible entity” being a state or local government, "HOPE" referring to Health, Opportunity, and Personal Empowerment, and a “qualified business or nonprofit organization” being a U.S.-based entity with technology experience. It also identifies the “target population” as individuals facing financial or food insecurity or recently out of foster care or juvenile detention.
4. Competitive grants for pilot projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan for the US government to offer competitive grants to eligible organizations from 2025 to 2030. These grants aim to help disadvantaged groups through either a HOPE Accounts Pilot Project, which provides financial tools and technology to improve savings and access to benefits, or a HOPE Action Plans Pilot Project, which partners with organizations to support long-term financial goals.
Money References
- (f) Amount of grant.—Grants made under this section shall range in amounts from $250,000 to $3,000,000, and shall be proportionate to the geographical size, project complexity, and number of individuals participating in each project supported by the grant.
5. HOPE technology innovation contracts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Health and Human Services, along with other agencies, will hold a competition to grant contracts to businesses or nonprofits for developing technology for HOPE accounts, with contracts valued between $200,000 and $4,500,000. These technologies must be open-sourced, contractors can't share or sell household data, and there is a preference for mobile-friendly, secure, and easily updatable applications suitable for low-income users.
Money References
- (c) Size of contracts.—Contracts under this section shall range in size from $200,000 to $4,500,000.
6. Maintenance of effort and nondisplacement of workers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines rules for pilot projects and contracts, ensuring they do not reduce government aid, lengthen time or requirements to receive benefits, compromise legal rights, lower public sector jobs, increase or decrease work requirements, weaken program integrity, or misuse personal data. It also prohibits using these projects for immigration tracking or forcing applicants to manage benefits solely online.
7. Annual reports to Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The annual reports to Congress, due each year by September 30 from 2025 to 2031, will detail how pilot projects and contracts help low-income Americans access benefits more easily and affordably, save administrative costs, improve program accuracy, and provide better banking options.
8. Authorization of appropriations; technical assistance authorized Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes how funding will be provided to carry out the Act from 2025 to 2030, allocating specific amounts to various federal departments for staff expenses and grants, and authorizes technical assistance from multiple government entities and other sectors to support pilot projects and contracts. Additionally, it requires that at least 10% of the funds be used to help counties with persistent poverty, defined as counties with over 20% of the population living in poverty over the past 30 years.
Money References
- (a) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2030— (1) $10,000,000 to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, of which— (A) $500,000 shall be used internally by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for staff and other expenses to plan, award, and oversee pilot projects under section 4; and (B) $9,500,000 shall be available for grants under section 4; (2) $10,000,000 to the Secretary of Agriculture, of which— (A) $500,000 shall be used internally by Department of Agriculture for staff and other expenses to plan, award, and oversee pilot projects under section 4; and (B) $9,500,000 shall be available for grants under section 4; and (3) $15,000,000 to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, of which— (A) $500,000 shall be used internally by the Department of Health and Human Services for staff and other expenses to plan, award, and oversee pilot projects under section 4 and the contracts under section 5; (B) $9,500,000 shall be available for grants under section 4; and (C) $5,000,000 shall be available for contracts under section 5. (b) Technical assistance authorized.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Veterans of Affairs, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Labor, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation for National and Community Service, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Domestic Policy Council may, to advance the objectives of the pilot projects carried out under section 4 and the contracts carried out under section 5— (1) provide technical assistance; (2) solicit voluntary, nonmonetary assistance from universities, credit unions, and private sector technology companies, banks, and financial institutions; and (3) inform eligible entities of the applicable Federal, State, local, or Tribal statutory and regulatory authorities, including waiver authorities. (c) Persistent Poverty Counties.