Overview
Title
To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to support research into the effects of extreme weather on the subsurface natural and built environment, to support engineering standards and building codes for resilient designs against multihazards, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9771, the BUILT Act, is like a plan to figure out how bad weather affects roads and buildings and to make sure they are strong enough to last a long time. It wants smart people and groups to work together to come up with better building rules to keep everything safe and strong.
Summary AI
H.R. 9771, known as the “Building and Upgrading Infrastructure for the Long Term Act” or the “BUILT Act,” proposes amendments to the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to enhance the resilience of infrastructure against extreme weather. It aims to support research into understanding how extreme weather affects the subsurface environment and to develop engineering standards and building codes for more robust infrastructure. The bill mandates collaboration with various stakeholders, including academia and government entities, and outlines a timeline for organizing a workshop on multihazard design and reporting its findings to Congress.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The bill, titled the "Building and Upgrading Infrastructure for the Long Term Act" or the "BUILT Act," seeks to amend existing legislation to promote research related to extreme weather impacts on infrastructure. It directs efforts toward understanding and developing standards for subsurface environments, like soil and underground materials, and aims to bolster the resilience of buildings and infrastructure against changing climate conditions. The bill also mandates collaboration among governmental, academic, and private sectors to develop engineering practices and building codes that protect against multiple hazards.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the critical issues with the bill is its dependency on future financial appropriations, which creates uncertainty regarding its implementation. If funding is not allocated or is insufficient, the initiatives may struggle to begin or continue. Additionally, the process for selecting stakeholders and organizations for consultations is not clearly outlined, which could result in biased or exclusive participation. There is also concern about the lack of specific accountability measures or criteria to assess the success of the initiatives, which might undermine the effectiveness of the research and measures taken. Lastly, complex language and technical terms might make the bill less accessible to individuals who are not experts in these fields.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill endeavors to make infrastructure more resilient to climate change and extreme weather, which could benefit the public by potentially reducing damage and economic losses during natural disasters. By focusing on improving building designs and standards, it aims to create safer living environments and thus protect the public from the adverse impacts of extreme weather conditions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For researchers and academic institutions, the bill offers opportunities for significant involvement in groundbreaking research projects. It provides avenues for collaboration and potentially some policy influence through the consultation processes. However, the lack of specific selection criteria might marginalize deserving parties who could contribute meaningfully to the research.
Engineering and construction firms might benefit from new opportunities as changes in building standards and practices could emerge. However, these industries might face challenges adjusting to new regulations if they are quickly implemented without adequate guidance or preparation time.
Federal and state agencies will need to coordinate effectively to manage the program's implementation, ensuring that stakeholder diversity and contributions align with legislative objectives. If handled well, these collaborations could set a precedent for future public policy initiatives focused on climate resilience.
Overall, while the bill sets a progressive path forward in terms of addressing climate impacts on infrastructure, its effectiveness will heavily depend on the availability of resources and the clarity of its execution frameworks.
Issues
The reliance on the availability of appropriations in Sections 10236 and 10237 may lead to uncertainty regarding the implementation and funding of the initiatives described, potentially affecting their feasibility and continuity.
The bill does not clearly define criteria for stakeholder selection in Sections 10236 and 10237, which might result in favoritism or exclusion of crucial entities in research and consultation processes.
There is a lack of defined accountability mechanisms or metrics to measure success in both Sections 10236 and 10237, which could hinder the evaluation of the effectiveness of the research and development efforts.
The discretion given to the Director in determining 'other research areas' or 'appropriate nongovernmental organization' in Sections 10236 and 10237 is broad and could lead to inconsistent application or focus from the original legislative intent.
The technical and complex language used throughout might impede understanding and accessibility for those not specialized in subsurface or climate resilience research, potentially alienating important public discourse or comprehension of the bill.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill gives it a short title, stating that it can be called the “Building and Upgrading Infrastructure for the Long Term Act” or simply the “BUILT Act.”
2. Subsurface environment research and development Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes new sections to a law, directing research and development on subsurface environments and climate resilience. It aims to improve infrastructure design and standards by studying subsurface materials and climate impacts while coordinating with various experts and organizations to enhance resilience against hazards.
10236. Subsurface environment research and development Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines a program where the Director will support research and testing to develop standards and practices for managing underground environments related to buildings. This includes studying soil and rock properties, using technology to monitor underground infrastructure, understanding risks to this infrastructure due to environmental changes, and improving building design standards with input from various organizations and experts.
10237. Climate resilience research and development Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines efforts to improve the resilience of buildings and infrastructure against future climate conditions by supporting research and setting up engineering standards, workshops, and reports. It involves collaboration with diverse organizations and experts, and requires a report to Congress with possible recommendations for enhancing multihazard resilience in the U.S.