Overview
Title
To ensure the security and integrity of United States critical infrastructure by establishing an interagency task force and requiring a comprehensive report on the targeting of United States critical infrastructure by People’s Republic of China state-sponsored cyber actors, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make a special team of people from different parts of the U.S. government to help protect important things like power and water from being messed with by hackers, especially from a country called China. This team will look at what's dangerous, tell the government what's happening, and teach people how to stay safe from these cyber threats.
Summary AI
H.R. 9769 proposes the creation of an interagency task force to safeguard U.S. critical infrastructure from cyber threats originating from state-sponsored actors, particularly from the People's Republic of China. The bill outlines the task force's leadership, membership qualifications, and its role in coordinating with existing efforts to bolster cybersecurity defenses. The task force will deliver regular reports to Congress evaluating the risks and impacts of such threats and recommending measures to counter them. Additionally, it mandates an awareness campaign to help critical infrastructure sectors understand available federal resources for mitigating cyber threats.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation titled the "Strengthening Cyber Resilience Against State-Sponsored Threats Act" intends to bolster the security of the United States' critical infrastructure by forming a collaborative interagency task force. The bill focuses on addressing the cybersecurity threats posed by state-sponsored cyber actors from the People's Republic of China, specifically entities like "Volt Typhoon." The task force, spearheaded by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), is tasked with analyzing these threats, recommending resources, and delivering periodic reports to congressional committees. These reports will assess potential risks, the nation's readiness to counteract such threats, and provide pertinent recommendations for improving cyber defenses.
Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns raised by the bill is the complexity involved in establishing an interagency task force, which necessitates coordination among multiple federal entities. This could potentially lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies. Additionally, the fact that the task force's findings and assessments are mostly classified might create transparency issues for the general public. People may have concerns about the nature and extent of the cyber threats as well as how effectively the government is handling them.
Further scrutiny may also arise due to the bill's exemptions from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and the Paperwork Reduction Act. These exemptions could lead to questions about the level of oversight and accountability under which the task force operates. Additionally, there is a lack of explicit detail on how the recommendations and actions proposed by the task force will be implemented, which might present a gap in ensuring the protection of critical infrastructure. The bill also addresses information sharing, which could raise concerns about the handling and security of sensitive data, especially given the necessity of appropriate security clearances for task force members.
Impact on the Public
The implementation of this bill might have a broad impact on the public by striving to secure the nation's critical infrastructure, which includes essential systems and services such as energy, transportation, and telecommunications. Improved cybersecurity could lead to increased public confidence in the resilience of these systems against potential threats from foreign actors. However, the secretive nature of much of the task force's work could leave the public in the dark about specific threats and remedial measures, potentially fostering uncertainty or skepticism among citizens about the efficacy of government actions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For federal agencies involved, the bill presents both a challenge and an opportunity. They are tasked with the complex mission of collaborating effectively to counter sophisticated cyber threats. The interagency task force's roles could foster improved cooperation across agencies, potentially enhancing overall national cybersecurity infrastructure.
On the other hand, critical infrastructure operators and owners in sectors like energy, transportation, and finance might be directly impacted by the recommendations and measures resulting from the task force's findings. They could benefit from enhanced guidance and resources to secure their operations, but they may also face regulatory pressures to comply with newly established standards or protocols.
Overall, while the bill's aim to enhance national cybersecurity is clear, its success will largely depend on how effectively these complex collaboration efforts are managed and whether the concerns around transparency and implementation are adequately addressed.
Issues
The bill involves significant collaboration between various federal agencies creating an interagency task force, which might raise concerns about bureaucratic complexity and efficiency. This issue is noted in Section 2(a).
The task force's reports and assessments are largely classified, as mentioned in Sections 2(f)(5) and 2(g), which might raise transparency concerns from the general public about the cybersecurity threats posed by State-sponsored cyber actors and the responsiveness of government measures.
The exemption from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and the Paperwork Reduction Act in Sections 2(i) and 2(j) could raise legal and ethical questions regarding oversight and accountability of the task force's activities.
The bill does not detail specific measures to ensure that the task force’s actions and recommendations are implemented effectively, which might be considered a gap in ensuring the enhanced protection of critical infrastructure (Sections 2(a) and 2(f)(3)).
The scope of information sharing specified in Section 2(g) might lead to concerns over the handling and security of sensitive data, particularly considering the need for appropriate security clearances for task force members as identified in Section 2(g)(3).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the official name of the Act is “Strengthening Cyber Resilience Against State-Sponsored Threats Act”.
2. Interagency task force and report on the targeting of United States critical infrastructure by People’s Republic of China State-sponsored cyber actors Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines the creation of an interagency task force led by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to address cybersecurity threats to critical infrastructure in the U.S. from state-sponsored actors like those from China. This task force will assess risks, suggest resources, and prepare classified reports on the threat level and U.S. preparedness, with findings shared with certain congressional committees.