Overview
Title
To authorize the establishment of a program to combat oil theft in the Permian Basin.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9759 is a new plan that wants to stop people from stealing oil in a place called the Permian Basin by creating a special team with police and law helpers who will work together, and they will have some money to help them do their job. The plan also says that people who steal oil will get in bigger trouble, and every year, the team has to tell grown-ups in charge how they spent the money and what they did.
Summary AI
H. R. 9759 aims to combat oil theft in the Permian Basin by establishing the Permian Basin Oil Theft Task Force under the authority of the FBI. The bill authorizes $1 million for this initiative, requiring collaboration between federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement. Additionally, the bill increases penalties for oil-related thefts and allows Byrne JAG funds to be used to combat these crimes. Key activities and financial information related to the task force must be reported annually to the President and specific congressional committees.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Protect the Permian Act of 2024" is a legislative proposal aiming to combat oil theft in the Permian Basin, a significant oil-producing region in the United States. Introduced by Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas, this bill envisions establishing a task force dedicated to this mission. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is authorized to lead the effort, working in collaboration with state, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies. The bill also proposes increasing criminal penalties for oil theft and related crimes while allowing additional funding for anti-theft initiatives through existing federal grant programs. The bill recognizes specific committees in Congress that will oversee its progress and allocate funds amounting to $1,000,000 for its operations.
Significant Issues
While the bill addresses the pressing issue of oil theft, several significant issues need more clarity:
Rationale for Increased Penalties: The bill proposes harsher penalties for crimes related to oil theft. However, it does not provide a clear rationale for these changes, raising questions about their proportionality and necessity.
Criteria and Selection for Task Force Partners: The bill envisions a task force but lacks detailed criteria for selecting local, state, and tribal partners, which could lead to potential biases or inconsistencies in implementation.
Ambiguity in Definitions: Terms such as "oil refinery or related asset" and "oil, pipeline, oil and gas equipment or technology" lack precise definitions, leaving room for interpretation that might hinder effective enforcement.
Funding Allocation: The bill allocates $1,000,000 for the task force but fails to break down this budget clearly, which could lead to financial misuse or misaligned priorities.
Vague Guidelines for Fund Use: The provision allowing Byrne JAG funds for combating oil theft lacks specificity, making it unclear what kinds of programs qualify for this funding.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The bill aims to curb oil theft, an issue that ultimately affects industries reliant on stable oil supplies and prices. By establishing a focused task force and increasing penalties, the bill could deter illegal activities and contribute to economic stability. However, without clear definitions and guidelines, there could be confusion and inconsistencies in its application, leading to potential legal disputes or misuse of funds.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Oil Industry and Law Enforcement: The oil industry stands to benefit from reduced theft, which can save millions in lost revenue. Law enforcement agencies may receive enhanced resources and collaborative opportunities but will require clear guidelines to avoid operational ambiguities.
Local and Tribal Communities: Local and Tribal law enforcement agencies might gain increased participation in federal initiatives, providing new opportunities and challenges in cross-jurisdictional collaboration.
Judicial System: The proposed increase in penalties will impact the judicial system by potentially leading to more significant caseloads and longer prison terms, affecting correctional facilities and public resources.
General Public: Public understanding of the bill may be limited due to its technical language. Efforts to improve transparency and communication about its goals and processes could enhance public trust and support.
In conclusion, while the "Protect the Permian Act of 2024" addresses a critical issue, its success will depend on addressing the outlined issues to ensure fair, consistent, and effective implementation.
Financial Assessment
The bill titled "Protect the Permian Act of 2024," or H.R. 9759, includes financial provisions primarily focused on combating oil theft in the Permian Basin. Here's an analysis of how financial matters are addressed in the bill and some related issues:
Financial Appropriations and Spending
The bill authorizes the appropriation of $1,000,000 to establish the Permian Basin Oil Theft Task Force under the FBI's authority. This funding is intended to support the task force's efforts to reduce oil theft and includes coordination with state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. However, the bill does not break down this amount into specific spending categories, which could lead to potential financial misuse or ambiguity in spending priorities. Without a detailed spending plan, it could be difficult to ensure the effective use of allocated funds.
Issues Related to Financial Provisions
One of the identified issues in the bill is the lack of explicit criteria for selecting law enforcement partners at the local, state, and tribal levels. From a financial standpoint, this absence of criteria could result in inconsistent or biased distribution of the authorized funds. Clear guidelines for partnership selection could also help in justifying how the $1,000,000 is distributed among different law enforcement agencies.
Additionally, the bill allows Byrne JAG funds, which are federal criminal justice grants, to be used for programs combating oil theft. However, the language is vague concerning what constitutes an acceptable program. This vagueness could lead to ineffective allocation or misuse of these funds, as recipients might interpret the requirements differently without clear guidelines.
Reporting and Financial Oversight
The task force is required to submit an annual report to the President and relevant congressional committees detailing all activities and funds used. This annual reporting is intended as a measure of transparency and oversight. However, due to the general language used in defining the financial reporting requirements, there remains a risk of inadequate detail being provided in these reports, making effective oversight challenging.
In conclusion, while the bill appropriates funds for an important cause, the effectiveness of these financial provisions remains contingent upon clear spending plans and guidelines for fund use. Ensuring granular breakdowns of expenses and detailed criteria for fund allocation and reporting could enhance the bill’s transparency and effectiveness in addressing oil theft in the Permian Basin.
Issues
The enhancement of criminal penalties from 'one year' to '5 years' and 'ten years' to '15 years' in Section 3 lacks specified rationale, which could lead to concerns about the proportionality and necessity of such punitive measures. This is significant both legally and ethically as it affects the justice system and individuals involved.
The provision for the creation of the Permian Basin Oil Theft Task Force in Section 2 lacks detailed criteria for the selection of local, state, and tribal law enforcement partners, which could lead to potential favoritism or inconsistency in implementation. This could have political and legal implications.
There is a lack of clear definitions for the terms 'oil refinery or related asset' and 'oil, pipeline, oil and gas equipment or technology' in the enhanced penalties section, making it legally ambiguous and potentially problematic for enforcement and compliance (Section 3).
The authorization of $1,000,000 for the task force is not broken down into specific spending categories, leading to potential financial misuse or ambiguity in spending priorities (Section 2).
The language throughout the bill, especially in the amendments, appears technical and may result in misunderstandings among the general public and individuals without legal expertise, potentially reducing transparency and accountability (Section 3).
The provision allowing Byrne JAG funds to be used for programs combating oil theft is vague, lacking specific guidelines for what constitutes an acceptable program. This could lead to misuse or ineffective allocation of funds (Section 4).
The definition of 'relevant congressional committees' in Section 2 does not explain why these specific committees were chosen, which could raise concerns about oversight and appropriations.
Section 3 does not assess the impact of increased penalties on the judicial system or correctional facilities, potentially leading to unanticipated economic and social implications.
The act's title, 'Protect the Permian Act of 2024', is minimal and might not provide sufficient context for understanding the full scope of the legislation, leading to potential public misunderstanding (Section 1).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the name of this law is the “Protect the Permian Act of 2024.”
2. Permian Basin Oil Theft Task Force Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Permian Basin Oil Theft Task Force is authorized by the Director of the FBI to tackle oil theft in the area, working alongside state, local, and Tribal law enforcement. The task force will have at least three FBI employees and will report yearly to Congress and the President on its activities and spending. Congress has approved $1,000,000 for its operation, and specific Senate and House committees will oversee its reports.
Money References
- (e) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this section.
3. Enhancing criminal penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill increases the criminal penalties for stealing or transporting stolen goods, including oil and equipment, through changes to Title 18 of the United States Code. It raises the maximum prison terms for various theft-related offenses, extending them from 10 to 15 years and from 1 to 5 years, depending on the crime.
4. Additional authorized use of Byrne JAG funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines an amendment to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, allowing Byrne JAG funds to be used for programs aimed at reducing or fighting oil theft and related crimes, such as the theft of pipes, technology, and equipment connected to oil refineries or pipelines.