Overview
Title
To authorize the President to provide disaster assistance to States and Indian Tribes under a major disaster recovery program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9750 lets the President help places like States and Indian Tribes when big disasters happen, by giving them money to fix things and recover. It also sets up a special fund to manage this money and to make sure help gets where it's needed, but some parts of the bill aren't very clear about how this should work.
Summary AI
H.R. 9750 is a bill that seeks to permit the President to offer disaster assistance to States and Indian Tribes through a major disaster recovery program. This legislation establishes a new Natural Disaster Recovery Reserve Fund for managing funds related to unmet needs after a disaster. It also provides guidelines for distributing assistance, addresses unmet needs, and allows for technical and financial support for disaster recovery. Additionally, the bill outlines measures for disaster repair and rebuilding, FEMA's emergency home repair program, and requires reviews and reports to enhance the efficiency of disaster response and recovery efforts.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Natural Disaster Recovery Program Act of 2024," aims to enhance the federal government's disaster response through various initiatives. The bill seeks to enable the President to extend disaster assistance to states and Indian Tribes under a major disaster recovery program. It includes establishing a Natural Disaster Recovery Reserve Fund, offering support for unmet needs, elaborating on repair and rebuilding measures, and setting out detailed reporting and review processes. Amendments aim to streamline how disaster relief is administered and ensure that funds target unmet needs effectively.
Significant Issues
One of the leading concerns is the provision allowing grantees to use up to 13 percent of funds for administrative costs, adjustable through a flexible sliding scale. This could encourage inefficient spending or misuse of funds if proper oversight is not implemented. Additionally, the bill lacks specific criteria or definitions for assessing unmet needs, which could lead to subjective decision-making and uneven distribution of aid.
Another issue concerns the discretion given to grantees in prioritizing funds without requiring detailed spending plans. This lack of compulsory oversight could result in an improper allocation of resources. The provision allowing the President to extend the period for utilizing funds by up to four years might delay the reallocation of resources to other urgent needs.
Furthermore, sections allowing for the potential circumvention of environmental review processes raise concerns about adequately addressing environmental impacts during recovery efforts. Lastly, the report to Congress on major disaster declarations lacks detailed criteria for understanding "individual household need," which may hinder the ability to address systematic problems in assistance provision.
Impact on the Public
The bill could broadly improve disaster recovery efforts by making funds more accessible to states and communities in distress, facilitating faster rebuilding and recovery. However, the lack of detailed guidelines and oversight could result in uneven distribution of resources, potentially neglecting some areas' critical unmet needs. If misused, the flexibility in fund allocation might lead to inefficiencies, delaying vital recovery activities.
For communities impacted by severe weather events or natural disasters, the proposed measures could provide necessary support to rebuild homes and infrastructure. However, without clear criteria for "unmet needs," some areas might receive less aid than required, leaving residents with prolonged hardships.
Potential Impact on Stakeholders
State and Tribal Governments: These entities might benefit from increased control over disaster relief resources, fostering tailored approaches to recovery. However, there is a risk that without stringent guidelines, the allocation of funds could become inconsistent, leading to funding disparities.
Federal Agencies: Organizations such as FEMA must adapt to revised guidelines and might face increased administrative burdens due to enhanced reporting requirements and appeals processes.
Communities: While the bill proposes measures to address immediate needs and long-term recovery more effectively, vulnerable communities might not uniformly benefit due to the potential lack of clarity and oversight in implementation.
Environmental Advocates: Concerns about the bypassing of environmental reviews could spark opposition from environmental groups worried about developing new infrastructure in a way that might not account for ecological concerns efficiently.
Overall, while the proposed legislation holds promise for enhancing recovery responses, key issues around oversight, criteria clarity, and the potential for misuse remain significant hurdles that need addressing to ensure equitable and effective aid distribution.
Issues
The provision allowing grantees to use up to 13 percent of funds for administrative costs with a flexible sliding scale may incentivize inefficient spending or exploitation (Sections 2, 431).
The bill lacks specific criteria or methods for assessing 'unmet needs,' potentially leading to subjective allocation of disaster relief funds (Sections 2, 431; Section 3).
The language granting grantees complete discretion over fund prioritization without requiring a spending plan could lead to improper allocation of resources and diminished oversight (Sections 2, 431).
The provision for the President to extend the fund usage period by up to 4 years may delay the reallocation of resources to other unmet needs (Section 2, 431).
Environmental review processes might be circumvented, which could lead to harm not being adequately considered during recovery processes (Sections 2, 431).
The exemption from considering these funds as duplicative of other federal assistance may result in overlapping benefits unless carefully monitored (Sections 2, 431).
The 5 percent administrative cost limit for unmet needs assistance might be inadequate for smaller tribal governments or resource-limited states, affecting effective management of funds (Section 3, 432).
Broad terms like 'Other disaster-related services that alleviate human suffering' lack definition, leading to potential misuse of funds (Section 3, 432).
The report to Congress lacks criteria for 'individual household need,' risking inconsistent interpretations and failure to address systemic issues (Section 8).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Natural Disaster Recovery Program Act of 2024 provides the short title for the act and lists the main sections included, such as the recovery program, assistance for unmet needs, disaster declaration considerations, repair and rebuilding efforts, and several reports and reviews related to disaster recovery.
2. Natural Disaster Recovery Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Natural Disaster Recovery Program establishes a reserve fund to assist states and tribal governments with unmet needs after a major disaster, ensuring funds are allocated based on the level of need and are used properly according to federal guidelines. Additionally, it requires the President to assess and make publicly available data on unmet recovery needs and provides guidelines for funding use, procurement processes, and administrative costs to improve disaster recovery efforts.
431. Natural Disaster Recovery Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Natural Disaster Recovery Program sets up a reserve fund in the U.S. Treasury to provide financial support to states and tribal governments recovering from major disasters. It outlines how funds will be allocated, used, and monitored, ensuring unmet needs are addressed efficiently while safeguarding privacy and promoting best practices in disaster recovery.
3. Unmet needs assistance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the event of a major disaster, this section allows the Governor or Indian tribal government leaders to request a grant from the President to address unmet needs resulting from the disaster. The President may allocate funds from the Disaster Relief Fund, amounting to 10% of certain disaster-related grants, to provide technical and financial assistance. These funds can be used for home repairs, unmet needs not covered by other sources, and promoting economic recovery, while maintaining accountability through regular reporting.
432. Unmet needs assistance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes how, during a major disaster, state or tribal governments can request grants to cover unmet needs, such as home repairs or business recovery, and how the President can allocate funding. It mandates regular reporting on fund usage and restricts administrative expenses to 5% of the total funds received.
4. Further considerations for disaster declarations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that when deciding on disaster declarations, FEMA should focus more on severe local impacts and any previous disasters in the area within five years. The Administrator must update FEMA’s policies and report back to Congress on these changes and the number of disasters declared under these new criteria.
5. Repair and rebuilding Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to allow the President to provide financial and direct assistance for the repair of homes, utilities, and infrastructure damaged by major disasters. It also clarifies eligibility for such assistance and specifies that recipients do not need to demonstrate that support could be met by other means, like insurance proceeds.
6. FEMA Emergency Home Repair Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to authorize minor repairs on homes damaged by disasters so survivors can safely stay in them, adds requirements for identifying shelter and housing options after a disaster, and requires FEMA to issue regulations within two years.
7. Appeals of individuals and households program benefits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill makes changes to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by extending the period of assistance from 18 months to 24 months. It also mandates that FEMA provides applicants appealing a decision on their assistance eligibility with the documents used to make that decision, reasons for ineligibility, and steps to fix it, along with any inspection documents within 10 days after the inspection.
8. Report to Congress on major disaster declarations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Administrator to deliver a report to Congress within 180 days, detailing the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) processes for assessing disaster assistance needs since the past five years. The report must include information on FEMA's methods for determining household needs, common reasons for aid denial, appeal rates, response times, volunteer deployment, and outreach efforts in rural and underserved communities.
9. Review by Comptroller General Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to review the financial management practices of states receiving aid under a specific disaster relief section within five years of the Act’s passage. The Comptroller General must also give suggestions about the program to the Senate and House committees related to homeland security and infrastructure.
10. GAO study on timing of closing out disaster recovery Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to report to Congress, within a year, on the time it takes the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to officially close major disaster cases. This study focuses on disasters declared under a specific federal disaster relief law.