Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 9702 is a plan to create a group of smart people who will help make fighting wildfires better by sharing ideas and working with others. They are given $10 million to do this work, but it's important they spend it wisely.
Summary AI
H. R. 9702 aims to establish the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board, which will be responsible for turning wildfire research into practical applications and encouraging collaborations between wildfire experts and federal agencies. The Board will consist of members from various government departments, federal agencies, and the private sector, and will aim to share wildfire research findings and best practices widely. The bill authorizes $10 million in funding to support the Board's activities, and Board members will serve without pay but can be reimbursed for travel expenses. Additionally, the Board is required to submit a report to Congress on its activities and recommendations for wildfire research within two years of its establishment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "H. R. 9702" seeks to address the growing challenges associated with wildfires in the United States by establishing the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board. Here's an overview of the bill's objectives, significant issues, and potential impacts on both the public and specific stakeholders.
General Summary
The Wildfire Coordination Act aims to create a permanent advisory committee responsible for applying advancements in wildfire research to real-world scenarios. The Board will consist of representatives from multiple federal agencies alongside experts in various relevant fields, such as meteorological science and public health. Its main duties include identifying practical applications for wildfire research, fostering partnerships both within and outside of the government, and disseminating valuable findings and practices to appropriate stakeholders. The legislation authorizes a budget of $10 million to support these operations, and it mandates regular reporting to Congress on the Board's activities and progress.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns is the authorized $10 million funding, which lacks detailed guidelines for allocation and management. This absence of clarity might contribute to inefficient or wasteful spending. Additionally, there is potential for the Board to access further unspecified funding from federal members, resulting in possible overspending without checks and balances.
Ambiguities in the bill's language, such as the terms "operationalization" and "prioritization criteria," may lead to varying interpretations and inconsistent implementation. Moreover, the compensation structure for personnel, which allows the chairperson to set salaries outside normal pay classifications, could result in unreasonable salary determinations.
Vacancy filling procedures lack specific timelines, risking prolonged operational disruptions. Furthermore, while the Board is required to report on its progress, the lack of specified metrics makes evaluating their effectiveness challenging. Lastly, provisions exempting the Board from standard expiration laws may result in insufficient oversight over time.
Impact on the Public
In enhancing wildfire management capabilities, this bill promises to have significant positive effects on public safety and environmental protection. By translating research into practice, communities will likely see improved wildfire readiness and reduced damages from such natural disasters. However, if the expenditure issues remain unaddressed, ineffective fund utilization might reduce the potential benefits for the public.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Federal Agencies and Researchers: A strengthened collaboration between these entities could foster innovation and more practical applications of research. This integration could enhance efficiency and effectiveness in wildfire management operations.
State and Local Governments: These bodies might benefit from enhanced resources and support in managing wildfires, potentially improving their response capabilities and resource allocation. However, without proper funding guidelines, such benefits may be unevenly distributed or delayed.
Private Sector Entities: Companies involved in standards-setting, technology development, and wildfire-related services might find new opportunities for collaboration and influence in shaping best practices and policies.
Overall, while the Wildfire Coordination Act presents a promising framework for improving wildfire management through scientific research and technology, addressing identified issues is crucial to safeguard efficient utilization of resources and the long-term functionality of the Board.
Financial Assessment
The proposed legislation, H.R. 9702, includes specific financial references that allocate resources for the establishment and operation of the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board. These financial elements play a critical role in the board's potential efficacy and require careful consideration.
Financial Allocations
The bill authorizes $10,000,000 to be appropriated for the operations of the Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board. This funding is intended to remain available until expended, providing financial resources to initiate and maintain the activities outlined in the bill. This allocation is important for enabling the Board to achieve its objectives, such as translating wildfire research into practical applications and supporting collaboration among stakeholders.
Additionally, the bill permits the use of unspecified additional amounts available to the employing agencies of federal members for purposes related to the Board's activities. This implies that agencies can reallocate existing resources, enhancing the Board's potential funding capacity beyond the initially specified amount.
Issues with Financial Provisions
Lack of Detailed Guidelines: One of the significant concerns regarding the financial provisions in this bill is the lack of explicit guidelines on how the $10,000,000 should be managed or allocated. Without clear directives, there is a risk of inefficiencies or wasteful expenditure, as the allocation process might not prioritize the most impactful or needed areas of the Board's operations.
Unlimited Additional Funding: The provision allowing for additional funding from federal members' agencies is not capped. This flexibility, while potentially beneficial, also opens the door to unchecked spending. Overestimation of resource requirements or allocation without oversight could lead to financial imbalances.
Compensation and Personnel Costs: The bill permits the Chairperson to determine the pay for Board personnel without adhering to existing pay classifications. While this could provide flexibility, it raises concerns about potential unjustified salary expenses. Ensuring that compensation aligns with federal standards is crucial to prevent inflated personnel costs.
In conclusion, while the financial allocations in H.R. 9702 are intended to support a crucial initiative—enhancing wildfire science and technology—the lack of precise spending guidelines and the potential for unrestricted additional funding may lead to financial inefficiencies. Addressing these issues can help maximize the return on investment in wildfire research and operations.
Issues
The allocation of $10,000,000 for the Board's operation is authorized without clear guidelines on how the funds should be managed or allocated, which could lead to wasteful spending. (Section 2(f)(1))
There is no specified limit on additional funding sourced from Federal members, leading to potential unchecked spending. (Section 2(f)(2))
Language in Section 2(b)(1) uses vague terms like 'operationalization' and 'prioritization criteria,' leading to potential ambiguity in interpretation and implementation.
The provision in Section 2(c)(5)(B) allows the Chairperson to fix compensation of personnel without regard to existing pay classifications, leading to potential unjustified salary expenses.
The process for filling vacancies as outlined in Section 2(c)(2)(B) lacks specific timelines or procedures, potentially leading to prolonged vacancies that could hinder the Board's functioning.
Section 2(d)(1) imposes a broad scope of activities in the report without specific metrics or methods for assessing progress, making it difficult to evaluate outcomes objectively.
The provision for the Board's permanent establishment with indefinite term limits and termination exemption in Section 2(e) could result in a lack of oversight and accountability over time.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the "Wildfire Coordination Act."
2. Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Wildfire Science and Technology Advisory Board is established by the Secretary of the Interior to enhance and apply wildfire research. The Board will include members from various federal agencies and experts, who will work to transition research into practice, disseminate findings, and coordinate among stakeholders. Members will not be paid but will receive travel expenses, and the Board will provide a report to Congress every two years detailing its activities and progress.
Money References
- (1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section, to remain available until expended.