Overview

Title

An Act To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to periodically review the automatic maximum coverage under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance program and the Veterans' Group Life Insurance program, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 970 wants the government to check every five years if the life insurance money for soldiers and veterans is enough by looking at how much prices have gone up. But, it doesn't clearly say what to do if the prices change or let everyone see the check results.

Summary AI

H. R. 970, also known as the "Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025," proposes changes to title 38 of the United States Code. It mandates the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to evaluate and report on the automatic maximum coverage specified under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance and Veterans' Group Life Insurance programs every five years, starting January 1, 2026. This review will compare the current insurance coverage limit with a calculated amount based on inflation changes over the previous five years, and the findings will be shared with Congress.

Published

2025-04-07
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2025-04-07
Package ID: BILLS-119hr970eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
478
Pages:
4
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 160
Verbs: 30
Adjectives: 26
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 22
Entities: 42

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.35
Average Sentence Length:
53.11
Token Entropy:
4.65
Readability (ARI):
29.02

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation titled the "Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025" seeks to amend title 38 of the United States Code. Its primary goal is to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct periodic reviews of the maximum coverage amounts available under both the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) and Veterans' Group Life Insurance (VGLI) programs. Beginning January 1, 2026, and every five years thereafter, these reviews aim to assess whether existing coverage levels remain adequate by comparing them against an updated value adjusted by changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Significant Issues

One significant issue with the bill is the absence of specific guidelines on how and when adjustments to the insurance coverage should be implemented. The lack of clear directives could result in inconsistent application of the intended adjustments, potentially complicating the situation for servicemembers and their families. Furthermore, the bill introduces ambiguity regarding the calculation of the "average percentage by which the Consumer Price Index changed". It's unclear whether this should be calculated as an arithmetic or geometric average, which may affect how coverage increases are determined.

Another concern is that the bill states the review results "may serve as a guide" for coverage increases. This non-mandatory language suggests that there may not be any immediate or obligatory changes in response to the review findings, potentially limiting the effectiveness of the legislation.

Additionally, there is no explicit provision to ensure the transparency or public access to the periodic review results. A lack of public disclosure could hinder accountability and limit informed public discourse on the adequacy of coverage levels.

Finally, the bill solely relies on the Consumer Price Index to evaluate the adequacy of coverage. This approach does not account for other potentially relevant economic factors, such as specific financial needs or changing conditions for veterans and servicemembers.

Impact on the Public

The bill aims to ensure that life insurance coverage provided to servicemembers and veterans remains fair and adequate over time, reflecting economic conditions as represented by the CPI. In theory, regular reviews and potential adjustments could help protect servicemembers and veterans from inflation eroding the value of their insurance benefits, providing them with a safety net that keeps pace with changing economic circumstances.

However, the lack of clear guidelines and mandatory action could diminish these intended benefits, leaving servicemembers with uncertain or insufficient coverage should the review process not lead to actual changes in coverage amounts. The absence of transparency might further exacerbate these challenges by preventing public scrutiny and informed discussions on policy adequacy.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For servicemembers, veterans, and their families, the bill represents a commitment to reviewing and potentially adjusting life insurance benefits in response to inflation. This could be seen as a positive step toward maintaining financial security and managing the risks associated with significant changes in living costs.

Conversely, the insurance administrators and policymakers tasked with enacting this legislation might face difficulties due to the ambiguities and lack of concrete direction in the bill. They may find themselves implementing reviews without guidance on actionable outcomes, which could lead to inconsistencies in coverage adjustments.

Overall, while the bill's intentions align with providing fair and responsive coverage levels for servicemembers and veterans, uncertainties and lack of mandatory responses may hinder its positive impact and leave room for improvement in achieving its goals.

Financial Assessment

The bill titled the "Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025" addresses the financial aspects of the automatic maximum coverage under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) and Veterans' Group Life Insurance (VGLI) programs. Although it does not directly allocate funds, it impacts the coverage limits for these insurance programs.

Financial References and Calculations

The bill requires a periodic review of the maximum coverage limits for these insurance programs, beginning on January 1, 2026, and then every five years thereafter. The core financial reference within this legislation is the "$500,000" coverage amount, which serves as the baseline for calculating potential coverage adjustments. This amount is multiplied by the average percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) over the preceding five fiscal years. This adjustment mechanism attempts to ensure that insurance coverage keeps pace with inflation.

Issues and Concerns

Several issues have been identified with the financial mechanisms outlined in the bill:

  1. Lack of Implementation Guidelines: While the bill links coverage amounts to the Consumer Price Index, it does not provide detailed guidance on how these increases should be applied. This lack of specificity raises concerns over inconsistencies or delays in updating coverage limits.

  2. Ambiguity in CPI Calculation: The bill mentions the "average percentage" change in the CPI but does not clarify whether this should be calculated arithmetically or geometrically. Given that these methods can yield different results, this ambiguity could have significant implications for the amount of coverage provided.

  3. Non-Mandatory Adjustments: The findings from the periodic review are intended to "serve as a guide" rather than a mandate for adjusting coverage. This non-binding language may reduce the effectiveness of the reviews, as it does not require action based on the findings.

  4. Transparency and Public Access: The bill does not include a mechanism to ensure that the results of these periodic reviews are accessible to the public. Transparency is critical for accountability, and without mandatory disclosure, there is less public oversight or opportunity for informed debate.

  5. Reliance on CPI Alone: The reliance solely on the Consumer Price Index as a measure of economic change may not fully capture the financial needs or circumstances impacting servicemembers and veterans. Other economic factors could be relevant but are not considered under this bill.

Overall, while the bill establishes a procedure for reviewing and potentially adjusting insurance coverage, the financial references are embedded within a framework that leaves room for improvement in terms of clarity, mandate, and transparency. These issues could affect the bill's ability to adequately address the evolving financial needs of servicemembers and their families.

Issues

  • The periodic review process for automatic maximum coverage under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance and Veterans' Group Life Insurance programs lacks detailed guidelines on how or when increases in coverage based on the Consumer Price Index should be implemented. This lack of specificity could lead to confusion or inconsistent application of adjustments, impacting both servicemembers and their families. (Section 2)

  • There is ambiguity around the calculation of the 'average percentage by which the Consumer Price Index changed' over the five fiscal years preceding the review. Specifically, it is unclear whether this average should be arithmetic or geometric, which could affect the outcome of coverage adjustments. (Sections 2 and 1980B)

  • The bill does not mandate any specific outcome or action based on the periodic review findings, as it states the results 'may serve as a guide' for potential coverage increases. This non-mandatory language leaves the purpose and impact of the review uncertain, potentially limiting its effectiveness. (Section 1980B)

  • There is no mechanism ensuring transparency or public access to the results of the periodic review. The absence of a directive for making the review findings public could raise concerns about the accountability of the process and limit informed public discourse on coverage levels. (Section 2)

  • The bill relies solely on the Consumer Price Index to evaluate coverage amounts but does not consider other economic factors that might influence the adequacy of coverage, such as changes in economic conditions or needs specific to veterans and servicemembers. This could inadequately reflect their financial and insurance circumstances. (Sections 2 and 1980B)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Act is officially named the "Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025."

2. Periodic review of automatic maximum coverage under Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance and Veterans’ Group Life insurance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill mandates that starting January 1, 2026, and every five years after that, the Secretary must review and report on the maximum coverage amounts for Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance and Veterans’ Group Life Insurance. This involves comparing current coverage to an adjusted amount based on changes in the Consumer Price Index, which is a measure of inflation.

Money References

  • “(b) Amount described.—The amount described in this subsection is the amount equal to— “(1) $500,000; multiplied by “(2) the average percentage by which the Consumer Price Index changed during the five fiscal years preceding the review under subsection (a).

1980B. Periodic review of automatic maximum coverage Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In Section 1980B, the law mandates that every five years starting January 1, 2026, the Secretary must review how a specific insurance coverage amount relates to $500,000 adjusted by changes in the Consumer Price Index over the previous five years. This review is to be reported to the Veterans' Affairs Committees, potentially guiding adjustments in coverage levels.

Money References

  • described.—The amount described in this subsection is the amount equal to— (1) $500,000; multiplied by (2) the average percentage by which the Consumer Price Index changed during the five fiscal years preceding the review under subsection (a).