Overview
Title
To address the public safety issues and environmental destruction currently impacting Federal lands along the southern border, enhance border security through the construction of navigable roads on Federal lands along the southern border, provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection access to Federal lands to improve the safety and effectiveness of enforcement activities, allow States to place temporary barriers on Federal land to secure the southern border, reduce the massive trash accumulations and environmental degradation along the southern border, reduce the cultivation of illegal cannabis on Federal lands, mitigate wildland fires caused by illegal immigration, and prohibit migrant housing on Federal lands.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9678, also known as the "FLASH Act," is like a plan to make the U.S. southern border safer by building new roads and temporary fences. It wants to clean up trash, stop illegal camping and fires, and keep people from living on certain lands, but some of these ideas make people wonder if they're too harsh or not fair.
Summary AI
H.R. 9678 is a bill introduced in the 118th Congress intended to address public safety issues and environmental damage along the U.S. southern border. Known as the "Federal Lands Amplified Security for the Homeland (FLASH) Act," it proposes the construction of navigable roads and temporary barriers on Federal lands to enhance border security. The bill aims to reduce trash accumulation, the illegal cultivation of cannabis, and wildfires caused by illegal immigration. It prohibits housing for unauthorized immigrants on Federal lands and suggests cooperative agreements between federal agencies to improve environmental and security measures.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, titled the Federal Lands Amplified Security for the Homeland (FLASH) Act, aims to provide a comprehensive approach to enhancing border security and addressing environmental concerns along federal lands at the southern border of the United States. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill proposes various measures, including constructing roads for better accessibility, permitting certain federal and state agencies to place temporary structures for security purposes, reducing trash and pollution due to illegal crossings, and setting initiatives for wildfire management and environmental preservation.
General Summary
This proposed legislation seeks to tackle a range of issues related to security and environmental degradation on federal lands near the U.S.-Mexico border. It incorporates enhancements to border security infrastructure, expands access for federal agents in wilderness areas, introduces new penalties for illegal activities, like unauthorized cannabis cultivation, and imposes prohibitions on providing migrant housing on these lands. The bill is structured to balance border security concerns with environmental conservation efforts and seeks to engage multiple federal and state entities in its implementation.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from this bill: - Environmental and Legal Concerns: By allowing U.S. Customs and Border Protection activities in wilderness areas, the bill brings forth the risk of altering the protected status of these regions, potentially leading to environmental degradation. - Perceptions Towards Immigrants: The bill suggests that undocumented immigrants significantly contribute to environmental damage and wildfire risks, a stance that might not be fully supported by data, perpetuating potential biases. - Housing Prohibitions: The strict prohibition against using federal resources for housing certain immigrant populations raises ethical concerns, especially in emergency situations. - Severe Penalizations: The bill stipulates heavy fines and lengthy prison sentences for illegal pesticide use and cannabis cultivation, which could be perceived as excessively punitive without clear context.
Public Impact
Given its broad scope, the bill is poised to have a varied impact on the public. It could enhanced border security efforts in response to concerns over illegal crossings and related environmental damage. It aims to streamline interagency cooperation which could improve policy implementation. Yet, parts of the legislation may adversely affect wilderness conservation efforts and reinforce negative stereotypes about marginalized groups.
Impact on Stakeholders
Different stakeholders could experience the bill's impact differently: - Federal and State Agencies: Agencies like the U.S. Border Patrol, Department of the Interior, and Department of Agriculture may gain increased authority and resources to address security and environmental challenges but will face complex implementation and coordination challenges. - Local Communities and Indigeneous Tribes: Communities near the southern border may see changes in land use and conservation policies, potentially affecting local ecosystems and regional economies. Indigenous tribes, while not directly impacted by lands held in trust, could be indirectly affected by broader land-use changes. - Environmental Advocates: Conservation groups may raise objections to increased border activities in wilderness areas, fearing long-term negative effects on ecosystems and wildlife. - Immigrant Communities: Immigrant rights groups could view this bill as potentially detrimental, especially in light of policies that suggest correlating undocumented immigration with environmental harm and introducing severe penalties.
In sum, while aiming to enhance security and reduce environmental impact along the southern border, the bill brings with it a series of challenges and potential controversies that stakeholders will need to navigate carefully. Its comprehensive approach addresses pressing concerns but might need more refinement in certain areas to avoid unintended ramifications.
Financial Assessment
The bill, H.R. 9678, known as the "Federal Lands Amplified Security for the Homeland (FLASH) Act," allocates financial resources towards enhancing border security and managing environmental impacts on Federal lands along the southern U.S. border. This commentary will explore how the bill references and utilizes financial appropriations and how these allocations might relate to identified issues and concerns.
Financial Allocations in the Bill
Several sections of the bill provide financial references, including authorization for appropriations and potential penalties. Here are the key financial components:
Trespass Cannabis Cultivation Site Response Initiatives: The bill authorizes an appropriation of $16,037,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2031. This funding aims to address environmental contamination from illegal cannabis cultivation on Federal lands (Section 211). This substantial investment suggests a significant focus on managing the environmental aftermath of such activities.
Southern Border Fuels Management Initiative: The bill allocates $3,660,000 per fiscal year from 2025 through 2031 to manage vegetation and reduce wildfire risks along the southern border (Section 221). This allocation reflects a financial commitment to mitigate wildfires, which the bill largely attributes to unauthorized immigration, a point that could lead to stereotypes as noted in the issues.
Penalties for Illegal Activities: The bill outlines monetary penalties for certain illegal activities, particularly the use of unauthorized pesticides and illegal cannabis cultivation. The fines can be as high as $250,000, or imprisonment terms up to 20 years (Sections 212, 213, 214). Such severe penalties signal a strong deterrent approach; however, there is concern these might be perceived as excessively punitive.
Relation to Identified Issues
Several financial aspects of the bill interact with the identified issues:
The substantial financial investment in response initiatives for illegal cannabis cultivation and environmental management presents a potential for overemphasis on the impacts of illegal immigration without a comprehensive, substantiated basis. This could perpetuate negative stereotypes, as highlighted under the bill's issues (Sections 211, 221).
The dedication of significant funding towards managing environmental degradation contrasts with the bill's lack of financial provisions or exceptions for humanitarian support, like housing for undocumented migrants. This is seen in the prohibition of Federal expenditure for such housing, which raises ethical and legal concerns (Sections 302, 303).
Additionally, the financial commitment to respond to illegal cannabis cultivation and environmental degradation challenges aligns with efforts to improve enforcement and operational control at the border. These priorities, reflected in the budget allocations, suggest a focus on enforcement and environmental management at potentially the expense of broader or alternative remedies.
In summary, the bill's financial appropriations focus on border security enhancements and responses to environmental and illegal activities. While this reflects significant investments, the financial strategies might be seen as narrowly focused and potentially leading to unintended consequences, including reinforcing stereotypes and lacking humanitarian considerations.
Issues
The prohibition of Federal funds being used to provide housing to 'specified aliens' on Federal lands might raise ethical and legal concerns, especially given the lack of exceptions for humanitarian emergencies (Sections 302, 303).
Allowing U.S. Customs and Border Protection extensive access to wilderness areas and the ability to install infrastructure could potentially compromise the integrity and purpose of these protected regions, raising environmental and legal concerns (Section 102).
The mandates to mitigate environmental degradation and wildland fires primarily attribute these issues to aliens without lawful immigration status, which may not be substantiated and could perpetuate bias or stereotypes (Sections 222, 221).
Revoking the existing lease with the City of New York for portions of Floyd Bennett Field and restricting future similar leases can disproportionately impact this geographic area, potentially raising fairness and regional bias concerns (Section 302).
The penalties for illegal pesticide application and cannabis cultivation on federal public lands, including fines up to $250,000 and 20-year imprisonment, may be seen as excessively punitive (Sections 213, 214).
The definition of 'specified alien' relies on external references to the Immigration and Nationality Act, which can create confusion or misapplication without more precise context within the section (Section 301).
The bill lacks specific descriptions or criteria regarding what constitutes 'movable, temporary structures' for Border States placing on Federal lands, leading to potential interpretation and enforcement challenges (Section 103).
There is potential ambiguity in coordinating interagency cooperative agreements as it refers to an old Memorandum from 2006, which might not be relevant to current security and environmental contexts (Section 105).
The bill’s compliance requirements and references to laws like the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its amendments remain underexplained, which may create legal and compliance risks (Sections 101, 102).
The definition and scope of 'navigable roads' and the criteria for their construction and positioning are not clearly outlined, which might lead to variable interpretations and implementation inconsistencies (Section 101).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be called the "Federal Lands Amplified Security for the Homeland (FLASH) Act."
2. Table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Table of contents section of the bill lists the titles and sections included in the Act, covering topics like securing federal border lands, reducing environmental harm on public lands, and protecting communities near the border. It outlines specific initiatives and policies, such as creating roads for border security, protecting federal lands from illegal activities, and addressing environmental issues caused by border activities.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms used in the Act, including "appropriate congressional committees," which refers to specific committees in both the House and Senate; "Border State," meaning a state on the southern border; "covered Federal lands," which are specific public lands near the southern border but exclude lands held for Indian Tribes; "operational control," referring to a definition from the Secure Fence Act of 2006; "Secretary concerned," involving the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture concerning land management; and "southern border," which is defined as the border between the U.S. and Mexico.
4. Savings clause Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Savings Clause ensures that this Act does not restrict legal activities like grazing or hunting on federal lands, nor does it affect State or private lands. It also confirms that the Act does not alter treaties or agreements with Indian Tribes.
101. Enhancing border security through the construction of navigable roads along Federal border lands Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill proposes building "navigable roads" along Federal border lands to improve border security by allowing access for patrol and emergency response. It outlines requirements for the roads' size, positioning, and completion timeline, and mandates cooperation with the Secretary of Homeland Security for deploying fencing and technology to enhance border enforcement.
102. U.S. Customs and Border Protection access to wilderness areas Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Wilderness Act allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection to perform certain activities, such as using vehicles and aircraft, conducting patrols, and building roads in wilderness areas to secure the U.S. borders, while trying to protect the natural character of these areas as much as possible.
103. Placement of movable, temporary structures on certain Federal land to secure the southern border of the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows Border States to place temporary structures on certain Federal lands near the southern border without special permission, as long as they notify the responsible Secretary 45 days before placement. These structures can stay for up to one year, with possible 90-day extensions, if approved by the Secretary after consulting with Customs and Border Protection to decide if the border is secure.
104. Prohibition on Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from interfering with the activities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection on federal lands near the southern border. These activities include search and rescue operations and preventing illegal entries, such as terrorists, unauthorized immigrants, terrorist devices, drugs, and other contraband.
105. Interagency cooperative agreement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary concerned to make an agreement with the Secretary of Homeland Security to work together on national security and counterterrorism efforts on federal lands near the U.S. borders, following a specific agreement made in March 2006 or any future versions of it.
201. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines certain terms used in the subtitle, including "applicable fire and sanitation regulations," which refer to specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations, and "waste," which includes any human-created trash or debris that is left without permission or not placed in a proper receptacle.
202. Policies and procedures to reduce trash along the southern border Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the requirement for the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, to create and implement strategies within 90 days to reduce environmental damage caused by undocumented immigrants on federal lands near the southern border. It also emphasizes the need to focus on reducing trash, protecting sensitive natural and archaeological sites, and preserving wildlife habitats.
203. Transparency and accountability in trash accumulation on the southern border Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary concerned to submit a yearly report to Congress on the amount of trash collected on certain federal lands, mostly where unauthorized immigrants are present or drugs are illegally grown. This report must include details like the total amount of waste, costs of removal, wildlife impacts, and any other relevant information, while ensuring that the privacy of the individuals and organizations providing data is protected.
204. Penalties and fines Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, any non-citizen without legal status who breaks fire or sanitation rules on certain federal lands can face criminal charges and fines. The fines and penalties will be increased, but they cannot exceed 1 year in jail or $250,000. A report on the fines collected will be given to Congress every year.
Money References
- (b) Increased penalties and fines.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary concerned shall promulgate rules and regulations ensuring that the penalties and fines for carrying out, on covered Federal lands, the prohibited activities referred to in subsection (a) are escalated, such that the lower of the following increases occurs: (1) The maximum term of imprisonment and fines are doubled. (2) The maximum term of imprisonment and fines are raised to the greatest extent possible, such that— (A) the maximum term of imprisonment does not exceed 1 year; and (B) the fine does not exceed $250,000. (c) Enforcement.—The Secretary concerned shall enforce existing regulations regarding criminal penalties and fines authorized under such regulations, specifically regarding applicable fire and sanitation regulations on covered Federal land.
211. Trespass Cannabis Cultivation Site Response Initiatives Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This bill section outlines plans for dealing with environmental contamination from illegal cannabis growing on federal lands. It involves the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior setting up initiatives to clean up pollution and work with other groups, such as state agencies and nonprofit organizations, under specific guidelines. The section also details funding and legal responsibilities for these efforts.
Money References
- (i) Authorization of appropriations.—To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $16,037,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2031. ---
212. Criminal penalties for illegal pesticide application Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amended section of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act states that a private applicator who knowingly breaks the law can be fined up to $1,000, imprisoned for up to 30 days, or both. If they commit a federal offense at the same time, they can be imprisoned for up to 10 years in addition to any other penalties.
Money References
- Section 14(b)(2) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136l(b)(2)) is amended to read as follows: “(2) PRIVATE APPLICATOR.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—Any private applicator or other person not included in paragraph (1) who knowingly violates any provision of this Act shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than 30 days, or both.
213. Protection of national forests; Rules and Regulations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law from 1897, stating that if someone illegally grows cannabis on public lands using unapproved pesticides, they can be fined up to $250,000 or face up to 20 years in prison, or both.
Money References
- The Act of June 4, 1897 (16 U.S.C. 551; 30 Stat. 35), is amended by inserting “Any violation of the provisions of this section, the sections referenced in the preceding sentence, or such rules and regulations, which involves the illegal cultivation of cannabis on public lands using pesticides which are not in compliance with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.) shall be punished by a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both.”
214. Protection of Federal land; Rules and Regulations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any person caught growing cannabis illegally on federal land can face a fine up to $250,000, up to 20 years in prison, or both, and these penalties are in addition to other legal consequences they might face. The term "federal land" includes areas managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (excluding tribal trust lands), the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Money References
- (a) In general.—Any person who violates the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.) in connection with the illegal cultivation of cannabis on Federal land shall be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both.
221. Southern Border Fuels Management Initiative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Southern Border Fuels Management Initiative is a program set up by the Secretary of the Interior to manage vegetation along the southern border with the aims of reducing wildfire risks and improving safety and operational control. The program involves removing hazardous fuels, controlling invasive species, and installing firebreaks, and it will operate for seven years with $3.66 million allocated annually from 2025 to 2031.
Money References
- (e) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this section $3,660,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2031. (f) Termination.—The Initiative shall terminate 7 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. ---
222. Mitigating environmental degradation and wildland fires caused by illegal immigration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary concerned, working with the Secretary of Homeland Security, to create policies to prevent wildland fires and environmental damage caused by people crossing the southern border illegally. It also mandates reports to Congress and the Comptroller General on the effectiveness of these policies and incidents, including details such as the number of fires and environmental damage cases, their costs, and areas affected.
301. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines several terms used in the bill, including "Federal land management agencies," which refers to the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Forest Service. It also defines "housing" as shelters for certain aliens, and "specified alien" as someone not admitted under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
302. Prohibition on providing housing to specified aliens Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the use of federal funds to provide housing to certain aliens on any federally managed land. Additionally, it revokes the lease between the U.S. National Park Service and the City of New York for a specific area and prohibits similar leases in the future.
303. Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture are required to work together to submit a yearly report to Congress. This report must detail the number of specific immigrants who have received housing on federal land and provide information about their countries of origin.