Overview
Title
To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to affirmatively confirm the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to seek permanent injunctions and other equitable relief for violations of any provision of law enforced by the Commission.
ELI5 AI
The Consumer Protection and Recovery Act wants to make sure the FTC can stop businesses that break the rules and help people get their money back, even if it happened up to 10 years ago. It gives the FTC more power to ask for things like refunds or changes to bad deals.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the Consumer Protection and Recovery Act, seeks to modify the Federal Trade Commission Act to confirm the FTC's authority to request permanent injunctions and other equitable relief for violations of laws it enforces. It allows the FTC to pursue actions such as restitution, contract reformation, refunds, and disgorgement of profits from wrongful acts. The proposed changes clarify that these remedies can be applied for violations occurring within the last ten years, excluding any time the violating party is outside the United States.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Consumer Protection and Recovery Act aims to solidify the FTC's authority to seek permanent injunctions and other forms of equitable relief in cases of legal violations. This bill represents an important expansion of the FTC's powers, granting it the ability to pursue actions such as restitution, contract changes, refunds, and the recovery of property when addressing rule violations.
General Summary of the Bill
The legislation, labeled as H.R. 9665, proposes changes to the Federal Trade Commission Act to explicitly affirm the FTC's ability to seek permanent injunctions and other equitable remedies. These changes grant the FTC more robust enforcement capabilities to act against entities violating laws under its purview. Notably, the bill ensures these powers apply to both current and future legal actions from the date it is enacted.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues within the bill could impact its interpretation and execution:
Complex Language Structure: The amendments to Section 13 of the FTC Act are noted for their complexity. This intricate wording can create legal ambiguities, particularly regarding the insertion and restructuring of clauses.
Limitations Period Confusion: The bill introduces a 10-year limitations period for seeking equitable relief. However, excluding periods when individuals are out of the country from this timeframe might lead to inconsistencies and legal confusion.
Broad Language for Relief: The phrase "such other relief as the court determines to be just and proper" is broad, leading potentially to varied applications and outcomes by different courts.
Undefined Legal Terms: Terms such as "disgorgement" and "equitable relief" are not specifically defined within the bill. This lack of definition could be problematic for those who are not familiar with legal jargon, creating uncertainty for businesses and individuals who must comply with these regulations.
Political and Legal Implications: Expanding the FTC’s authority might be contentious, especially among groups concerned with potential regulatory overreach and its implications for businesses.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to enhance consumer protection by ensuring the FTC has robust tools to tackle unfair or deceptive practices. For consumers, this means potentially stronger safeguards against harm by corporations and businesses. The provision for refunds and property returns directly benefits individuals who might have experienced losses due to illegal corporate actions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Consumers: Positively, consumers stand to benefit from more effective recourse against unfair practices, potentially seeing quicker resolutions to grievances and better restitution for losses.
Businesses and Corporations: While the bill primarily seeks to protect consumers, businesses may face challenges with increased regulatory oversight. Companies will need to be more vigilant in compliance and potentially face more stringent penalties for violations. However, clear guidelines and equitable relief mechanisms might encourage fairer competition and prevent deceptive practices across industries.
Legal and Regulatory Communities: For attorneys and policymakers, the bill presents opportunities and challenges in navigating its complexities. The enhanced powers could lead to more cases being brought forward, requiring detailed legal interpretation and potentially setting new legal precedents.
Overall, while the Consumer Protection and Recovery Act represents a significant step in bolstering consumer rights, its complex language and potential for broad interpretation necessitate careful consideration to avoid unintended consequences and ensure fair and consistent application across different cases.
Issues
The language in the amendments to Section 13 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, mentioned in Section 2, is seen as overly complex. This complexity might make it difficult for stakeholders to easily understand the amendments and their implications, leading to potential legal ambiguities.
The provision in Section 2 regarding the 'limitations period' for seeking equitable relief may cause confusion. Specifically, the clause that excludes time an individual is outside of the United States from the 10-year period needs clarification to prevent inconsistent application across cases.
The broad language 'such other relief as the court determines to be just and proper' in Section 2 may lead to varying interpretations among courts. This could result in inconsistent outcomes when courts decide on the types of relief that are 'just and proper'.
In Section 2, the terms 'disgorgement' and 'equitable relief' are not explicitly defined, which could create uncertainty for those not familiar with legal terminology. This lack of clarity might pose challenges for individuals and corporations trying to comply with the law.
The potential increase in the Federal Trade Commission's authority to seek permanent injunctions and other equitable relief, as outlined in Section 2, could have significant political and legal implications. This expansion of power may be viewed as controversial, especially by those who believe it could lead to an imbalance of regulatory oversight.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act is named the “Consumer Protection and Recovery Act.”
2. FTC authority to seek permanent injunctions and other equitable relief Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Federal Trade Commission Act to enhance the FTC's power to seek permanent injunctions and other equitable remedies, like restitution, contract changes, refunds, or property returns, against violators. It also includes rules about calculating financial penalties, sets a 10-year limit on actions for violations, and ensures that these changes apply to ongoing and future cases from the enactment date.