Overview

Title

To improve defense cooperation between the United States and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

ELI5 AI

The United States-Jordan Defense Cooperation Act of 2024 is like a promise from the U.S. to help Jordan be safer by sharing defense tools and working together more on security. This promise involves lots of money and some special rules, but people are worried because it's not clear exactly how everything will be checked or how they’ll know if it’s working well.

Summary AI

The United States-Jordan Defense Cooperation Act of 2024 aims to enhance defense collaboration between the U.S. and Jordan. It proposes treating Jordan similarly to certain designated countries under the Arms Export Control Act for a period of three years, fostering capabilities against missile threats, and integrating Jordan into a regional air and missile defense system. This initiative also includes a new memorandum of understanding to boost economic and military cooperation after the current agreement ends in 2029.

Published

2024-09-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-09-17
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9637ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,324
Pages:
7
Sentences:
18

Language

Nouns: 434
Verbs: 80
Adjectives: 51
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 61
Entities: 108

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.48
Average Sentence Length:
73.56
Token Entropy:
4.96
Readability (ARI):
39.98

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 9637 is a legislative proposal aimed at strengthening defense cooperation between the United States and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The bill outlines various ways in which the U.S. intends to support Jordan's military capabilities, including making Jordan eligible for specific arms export provisions, establishing defense capabilities, and incorporating Jordan into a Middle East integrated air and missile defense system. The bill also authorizes the Secretary of State to establish a new agreement with Jordan to enhance military cooperation and economic support after the current memorandum expires in 2029.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues with this bill warrant attention. Firstly, the substantial financial commitment of $1,450,000,000 annually to Jordan lacks detailed accountability measures, raising potential transparency and effectiveness concerns. Secondly, treating Jordan as a preferred partner under the Arms Export Control Act without clear criteria may be viewed as preferential, raising questions about fairness and its implications for foreign policy. Thirdly, the bill's phrasing, such as "subject to the availability of appropriations," introduces uncertainties in funding and implementation. Moreover, the bill lacks detailed procedures to protect sensitive technology, potentially creating security risks in the current geopolitical climate. Additionally, it does not specify measurable goals or benchmarks for evaluating success, which could hinder effective review and accountability.

Impact on the Public

The bill could have broad implications for U.S. foreign policy and military strategy. By enhancing defense cooperation with Jordan, the U.S. aims to bolster regional security in the Middle East. For the American public, effective implementation of this bill could contribute to global stability, indirectly influencing national security and economic interests. However, the lack of transparency and measurable benchmarks could raise concerns about the prudent use of taxpayer money, affecting public trust in government accountability.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the U.S. government, this bill provides a framework to enhance strategic alliances and expand military influence in the Middle East. It strengthens ties with a key ally, potentially leading to more robust collaboration on regional security issues.

For Jordan, the bill could lead to significant military enhancements, improved defense capabilities, and increased economic support, helping to stabilize the nation amidst regional tensions. However, stakeholders will need to navigate complexities associated with cost-sharing, intellectual property rights, and sensitive technology protection.

Defense contractors might see positive impacts through potential arms sales and support services, although these benefits depend on the availability of appropriations and adherence to strict compliance and security standards.

In summary, while H.R. 9637 seeks to improve defense cooperation and thereby enhance regional and global security, it must address critical issues related to transparency, funding, and security to achieve its objectives effectively and maintain public and stakeholder confidence.

Financial Assessment

The United States-Jordan Defense Cooperation Act of 2024 involves several significant financial references, which are integral to understanding its potential impacts and the concerns raised.

Financial Commitments

The bill underscores a substantial financial commitment by the United States, pledging $1,450,000,000 annually in bilateral foreign assistance to Jordan from fiscal year 2023 through fiscal year 2029. This forms a pivotal component of the strategic partnership between the two countries and is intended to underscore the U.S.'s ironclad commitment to Jordan's stability and security. However, the absence of detailed accountability measures or benchmarks for tracking this financial assistance raises potential concerns regarding transparency and efficacy. Without these measures, there is limited assurance that the funds are being utilized effectively, leading to possible financial mismanagement or inefficiencies.

Arms Export Control

The legislation introduces a provision that, for a three-year period, treats Jordan similarly to certain designated countries under the Arms Export Control Act. This potentially eases the process for Jordan to access U.S. defense articles and services. The financial implications of this preferential treatment could be significant, as it might lead to increased sales of military equipment. However, this approach raises concerns about transparency and might be seen as offering Jordan an unwarranted advantage without clear criteria, potentially impacting foreign policy and national security spending.

Future Financial Uncertainties

Another notable reference in the bill pertains to the clause "subject to the availability of appropriations" concerning future memoranda of understanding following the expiration of the current agreement in 2029. This introduces uncertainty in financial planning, as it suggests that any future financial commitments are not guaranteed and depend on future budgetary decisions. This lack of assured funding can complicate long-term strategic planning and expectations for both the U.S. and Jordan.

Lack of Measurable Goals

The bill lacks specific, measurable goals or metrics to evaluate the success of the increased support and cooperation, particularly in Section 4 where terms like "enhanced strategic dialogue" are used but not concretely defined. This absence of metrics makes it challenging to assess whether the allocated funds achieve their intended outcomes, thereby impacting accountability and oversight of U.S. taxpayer money.

Overall, while the United States-Jordan Defense Cooperation Act of 2024 aims to strengthen defense ties with Jordan, it brings to the forefront important considerations about financial transparency, accountability, and effective use of taxpayer funds, all of which require careful examination and monitoring to ensure the act's objectives are met in a fiscally responsible manner.

Issues

  • The substantial commitment of $1,450,000,000 per year in United States bilateral foreign assistance to Jordan, as noted in Section 2, lacks detailed accountability measures or benchmarks for assessing its effectiveness, posing a potential financial concern and raising questions about transparency in the allocation of taxpayer funds.

  • Including Jordan as if it were a country listed in certain provisions of the Arms Export Control Act, as described in Section 3, without clear criteria may raise concerns about preferential treatment and its implications for foreign policy and national security.

  • The phrase 'subject to the availability of appropriations' in Section 4 introduces funding uncertainty which could impact planning and expectations, thereby affecting the bill's implementation and potential effectiveness.

  • The lack of detailed procedures to protect sensitive technology and information in Section 3(b)(1)(B) presents a possible security risk which might be significant given current geopolitical tensions.

  • The absence of specific measurable goals or metrics to evaluate the success of the increased support and cooperation outlined in Section 4 makes it difficult to ensure accountability and oversight, which is essential for monitoring the outcomes of such allocations effectively.

  • The report and memorandum of agreement requirement in Section 3 lacks a specified timeline for submission, leading to possible delays and hindering timely oversight and accountability.

  • The term 'ironclad commitment' used in Section 2 is subjective and non-quantifiable, making it unclear how this commitment will be measured or evaluated in practical terms, thus raising potential implementation challenges.

  • The clause in Section 4 on 'enhanced strategic dialogue' is vague, lacking clear objectives or outcomes, which could result in ineffective diplomatic engagements without concrete benefits.

  • The sunset clause in Section 3(d) lacks criteria or metrics for evaluating the success or issues of the activities described in subsections (b) and (c) before expiration, which might lead to continuation or cessation without a clear understanding of the activities' impacts.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States-Jordan Defense Cooperation Act of 2024 is the title of the bill, making it the official name by which the act can be referred.

2. Sense of congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section expresses Congress's viewpoint that quickly approving military sales to Jordan aligns with U.S. security and world peace goals, and highlights the strong U.S. commitment to Jordan's stability through a multi-year financial assistance agreement.

Money References

  • It is the sense of Congress that— (1) expeditious consideration of certifications of letters of offer to sell defense articles, defense services, design and construction services, and major defense equipment to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan under section 36(b) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) is fully consistent with United States security and foreign policy interests and the objectives of world peace and security; and (2) the United States commitment to the stability and security of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is ironclad, as demonstrated by the signing of the fourth Memorandum of Understanding on Strategic Partnership in September 2022, which provides $1,450,000,000 per year in United States bilateral foreign assistance to Jordan beginning in fiscal year 2023 and ending in fiscal year 2029.

3. Enhanced defense cooperation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

For three years, Jordan will be treated as a country eligible for certain arms export provisions, and the U.S. will work with Jordan's defense leaders to improve defenses against missile threats. This cooperation includes sharing costs and research for new capabilities, ensuring sensitive information is protected, and encouraging Jordan’s participation in a regional missile defense system, with required progress reports and oversight. The authority for these activities expires on December 31, 2028.

4. Memorandum of understanding Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of State is allowed to create a new agreement with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan after the current one ends in 2029. This new agreement may increase funding for economic support, improve military cooperation, including exercises and exchanges, support international peacekeeping, and promote strategic discussions.