Overview

Title

To amend title 41, United States Code, to make changes with respect to the Federal Acquisition Security Council, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to change how a group in the government checks if the stuff they buy is safe from bad guys. It wants this group to work better and tell the people in charge if there's anything that could be dangerous.

Summary AI

H.R. 9597, also known as the "Federal Acquisition Security Council Improvement Act of 2024," aims to make changes to the way the Federal Acquisition Security Council operates. The bill updates definitions related to security risks from foreign sources, outlines new roles and structures within the Council, and introduces processes for handling risks associated with government supply chains. The bill also requires the Council to report to Congress on security risks and coordinate with other federal agencies to ensure compliance with existing laws protecting U.S. national security.

Published

2024-09-16
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-09-16
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9597ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
5,823
Pages:
31
Sentences:
60

Language

Nouns: 1,394
Verbs: 503
Adjectives: 148
Adverbs: 40
Numbers: 226
Entities: 247

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.89
Average Sentence Length:
97.05
Token Entropy:
4.97
Readability (ARI):
48.47

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

This bill, titled the "Federal Acquisition Security Council Improvement Act of 2024," aims to amend Title 41 of the United States Code. Its primary focus is on making adjustments to the Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC), an entity responsible for addressing national security risks associated with the procurement of certain goods and services by the federal government. These modifications include reorganizing the council's structure, refining its roles and responsibilities, and introducing a new program office to assist in these functions. The bill emphasizes defining and acting upon security threats from foreign adversaries and recommends updating regulations to align with existing federal laws on procurement security.

Significant Issues

One notable concern is the broad definition of a "source of concern," which could lead to ambiguities in identifying entities subject to scrutiny. This wide scope raises potential civil liberties concerns, especially regarding fairness and the potential for overreach.

The establishment of a new program office under the National Cyber Director could duplicate efforts already underway in other agencies, possibly leading to redundancy and inefficient use of resources. Additionally, the bill grants officials the power to issue waivers for exclusion and removal orders. These waivers can last up to 365 days and be renewed, which might undermine the enforcement of security measures critical to national safety.

Another point of concern is the lack of explicit criteria for approving these security orders and granting waivers. Without clear guidelines, the implementation could become inconsistent, leading to unpredictability and possible legal challenges.

Furthermore, the bill reallocates responsibilities from the Office of Management and Budget to the Office of the National Cyber Director. The absence of a clear rationale or analysis of potential resource impacts raises questions about the transparency and effectiveness of this shift.

Broader Public Impact

The bill's attempts to fortify the country's procurement processes against foreign security risks generally aim at enhancing national security. However, its broad definitions and potential for redundancy might lead to inefficiencies or threats to civil liberties. The public could see improved national safety if the bill effectively streamlines and strengthens security oversight. Conversely, vague definitions and criteria might lead to concerns about transparency or potential overreach.

Impact on Stakeholders

Federal Agencies: Agencies might face increased burdens in complying with new procedures and coordinating with the newly established program office, possibly affecting their efficiency. The changes may require realignment of existing resources, which could either divert attention from their current operations or necessitate additional funding.

Foreign Entities: International businesses and foreign governments could be significantly impacted if they are classified under the newly defined terms as "sources of concern." This could restrict their ability to engage in contracts with the U.S. government, leading to potential economic and diplomatic repercussions.

National Security Community: The bill could positively impact this community by centralizing efforts and reinforcing regulations to counteract foreign threats. However, the potential for redundancy might dilute the effectiveness of the existing framework.

General Public: For the general populace, enhanced national security measures are reassuring, providing a sense of safety against foreign threats. Nevertheless, the public may also be concerned about potential government overreach and the protection of civil liberties, especially if these broad definitions and vague criteria lead to misapplication in the real world.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to bolster national security through improved procurement security measures, it must navigate significant challenges related to definitions, resources, and transparency to avoid unintended negative consequences.

Issues

  • The amendment in Section 2 broadens the definition of 'source of concern,' which might lead to ambiguity and legal gray areas in determining which entities are subjected to scrutiny, raising potential concerns over civil liberties and fairness.

  • The establishment of a Federal Acquisition Security Council Program Office within the National Cyber Director's purview, as described in Section 2, could lead to duplication of efforts and inefficient use of resources, potentially leading to government waste.

  • The authority to issue waivers for exclusion and removal orders for up to 365 days, with possible renewal (Section 2), could undermine the enforcement of crucial security measures, potentially exposing vulnerabilities.

  • The lack of explicit criteria for approving orders and granting waivers (as noted in Section 2) may result in inconsistent application and potential legal challenges, causing unpredictability in enforcement.

  • The amendment reallocates responsibilities from the Office of Management and Budget to the Office of the National Cyber Director (Section 3) without explaining the rationale or potential resource impacts, raising transparency and efficiency concerns.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act states its short title, which is the “Federal Acquisition Security Council Improvement Act of 2024.”

2. Changes with respect to the federal acquisition security council Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The changes to the federal acquisition security council include new definitions, adjustments to its structure, responsibilities, and membership, and the establishment of a program office for supporting its functions. The amendments also outline procedures for designating and issuing orders related to security risks from foreign sources, improving communication and compliance with agency heads, and maintaining alignment with existing security laws.

1329. Additional provisions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines how the Council must work with agency leaders to ensure they follow certain federal prohibitions listed in specific defense authorization acts. Additionally, it requires the Federal Acquisition Security Council to update any necessary regulations within two years of this section's enactment.

3. Reallocating existing resources Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill changes the wording in part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 by replacing "Office of Management and Budget" with "Office of the National Cyber Director." This change is made in two different places within the same paragraph.