Overview
Title
To establish in the Department of State the Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 959 wants to make a special team in the U.S. Department of State to watch and stop people from being mean to others because of their Muslim faith, but it doesn't say how much this will cost or clearly explain some important parts.
Summary AI
H. R. 959 aims to create an Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia within the U.S. Department of State. This new office will be responsible for tracking and fighting acts of Islamophobia across the globe. It will work to include information about Islamophobic incidents and government responses in existing State Department reports on human rights and religious freedom. The bill mandates that these changes be implemented within 120 days of enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "Combating International Islamophobia Act" proposes the establishment of an Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia within the United States Department of State. Its main purpose is to monitor acts of Islamophobia in foreign countries, combat such acts, and report on their nature and extent as part of existing international religious freedom and human rights reports. The office would be overseen by a Special Envoy appointed by the Secretary of State. The bill also seeks to include information about Islamophobic acts in annual reports by the Department of State.
Summary of Significant Issues
While the bill is well-intentioned, aiming to address global Islamophobia, there are several notable issues. A significant concern is the lack of a clear definition for "Islamophobia" and "Islamophobic incitement" within the text. This absence could lead to various interpretations and inconsistent applications of the bill's aims. Additionally, the bill does not specify funding sources or limits, which raises concerns about potential uncontrolled expenditures. The responsibilities of the newly created office are outlined, but there are no clear metrics or frameworks for evaluating its effectiveness, which might result in accountability challenges. Furthermore, the complexity of the language used in the bill could make it difficult for a general audience to understand, potentially leading to misinterpretations. Issues of potential conflict of interest arise with the possibility of appointing a Special Envoy from existing State Department staff who may retain prior duties.
Impact on the Public Broadly
If implemented effectively, this bill could positively impact the global Muslim community by bringing international attention to Islamophobic acts. By establishing a dedicated office, the U.S. shows a commitment to confronting religious intolerance internationally. However, without clear definitions and oversight mechanisms, the bill's effectiveness could be significantly curtailed. Additionally, without specified funding, the office's resources and capabilities might be insufficient, making it challenging to fulfill its mandates.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For global Muslim communities, the proposed office could provide an avenue for addressing grievances related to Islamophobia. However, the lack of specificity about what constitutes Islamophobia could result in uneven enforcement and limited action. For governments in foreign countries, the bill's requirements for reporting on Islamophobia could necessitate new systems and data collection processes, potentially straining resources without additional support or funding from the U.S.
For the Department of State, establishing this office introduces additional bureaucratic responsibilities and necessitates adequate staff and funding allocations to be effective. The prospect of assigning the role of Special Envoy to a current employee could lead to conflicts of interest or divided focus if responsibilities are not carefully managed.
Overall, while the objective of the bill to combat Islamophobia is commendable, its practical implementation may face significant hurdles unless these issues are addressed.
Issues
The bill does not define 'Islamophobia' or 'Islamophobic incitement,' which could lead to ambiguity in interpretation and application. This lack of definition appears in Sections 2 and 66 and is crucial for preventing varied interpretations of key terms.
There is a lack of specified budget or funding limits for the establishment and operation of the Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia in Sections 2 and 66, raising concerns about potential uncontrolled or wasteful spending.
The responsibilities and objectives of the Office and Special Envoy are outlined but without clear metrics or criteria for evaluating effectiveness, as noted in Sections 2 and 66. This absence could lead to accountability issues and difficulties in measuring the success of the initiatives.
The language used in the bill is complex and may be difficult for the general public to understand, particularly in Section 3, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations.
The bill does not specify oversight or evaluation mechanisms for the Office to ensure accountability and effectiveness, especially noted in Section 2. This missing element raises concerns about who would monitor the Office's activities and results.
Section 3 mandates detailed reporting of Islamophobia, which could add significant workload without indicating funding sources, raising concerns about potential unfunded mandates and resource allocation issues.
The provision in Section 66, which allows the appointment of a Special Envoy who may retain their previous position, could lead to conflicts of interest or divided responsibilities, impacting the efficiency and focus of the Office's activities.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill is titled "Short title" and states that the Act may be referred to as the "Combating International Islamophobia Act."
2. Authorization for establishment of Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The new section added to the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 requires the creation of an Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia within the Department of State. This office, led by a Special Envoy, is tasked with tracking and combating Islamophobia in other countries and contributing to specific government reports about the issue.
66. Monitoring and combating Islamophobia Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes an Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia within the Department of State, headed by a Special Envoy appointed by the Secretary of State. The Office's duties include monitoring Islamophobia abroad, preparing relevant reports, and consulting with various organizations to effectively address issues related to Islamophobia.
3. Inclusion in Department of State annual reports of information concerning acts of Islamophobia in foreign countries Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires adding information to annual reports by the Department of State on human rights and religious freedom, specifically detailing acts of Islamophobia in foreign countries. This includes reporting on violence against Muslims, Islamophobic propaganda, governmental responses, laws protecting religious freedom, and efforts in anti-bias education, with these requirements effective 180 days after the law is enacted.