Overview
Title
An Act To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2777 Brentwood Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office.
ELI5 AI
The bill says that there's a special building where people send letters and packages in Raleigh, North Carolina, and now it's going to be called the "Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office." This means whenever people talk about this place, they'll use its new name. 🏤✉️
Summary AI
H. R. 9580 designates the United States Postal Service facility located at 2777 Brentwood Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the "Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office." This means that any future references to this postal facility in legal documents, maps, and other records will refer to it by its new name. The legislation was enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives and attested by the Speaker of the House and the Vice President of the United States.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, identified as H.R. 9580, aims to designate the United States Postal Service facility located at 2777 Brentwood Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the “Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office.” This legislative action, passed by the 118th Congress during its second session, solely focuses on renaming this specific postal facility. The bill stipulates that all legal and official references to this facility will now use this new designation.
Summary of Significant Issues
While the bill appears straightforward, several potential issues warrant consideration. One primary concern revolves around the transparency and fairness of the naming process. The bill does not provide details on why the name "Millie Dunn Veasey" was chosen, leaving room for questions about the underlying criteria or rationale. This lack of detail could lead to criticisms regarding favoritism or insufficient community support.
Additionally, although naming a postal facility does not inherently involve direct financial implications, there might still be indirect costs. Updating all relevant documents, maps, and records to reflect the name change could necessitate unforeseen expenses, especially if such costs have not been accounted for in budgeting. Thus, ensuring clear communication regarding any associated financial requirements is crucial.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill carries symbolic significance rather than practical implications. The naming of public facilities often serves to honor individuals and preserve their legacies. However, without further context or widespread recognition of Millie Dunn Veasey's contributions, the renaming might not resonate broadly with the general populace. Moreover, any indirect financial consequences associated with updating references might not directly affect the public but could, in aggregate, influence how public funds are allocated to other projects.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved with the postal facility—such as USPS employees, local residents, and community leaders—the renaming may hold more tangible significance. If Millie Dunn Veasey was a figure of local importance, stakeholders might view the renaming as a meaningful gesture that honors her legacy. Conversely, if the decision-making process lacks transparency or community involvement, it could result in dissatisfaction or disagreement among those stakeholders.
Municipal and federal entities responsible for maintaining records and signage might bear the brunt of any logistical and financial impacts, particularly if the renaming necessitates changes to official materials and databases. Therefore, clear communication and adequate resources will be essential to implement this change efficiently, minimizing any disruption or unforeseen expenditures.
Ultimately, while the bill exemplifies a legislative action rooted in symbolism, addressing the surrounding concerns transparently can help mitigate potential criticisms and enhance community engagement.
Issues
The designation of the facility as the 'Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office' may raise concerns about the transparency and fairness of the naming process as the section does not specify the criteria or rationale for selecting this name. This could lead to potential questions of favoritism or lack of community support (Section 1).
While renaming a facility typically does not imply significant financial costs, there may be indirect costs associated with this change. For example, expenses could arise from the need to update all documents, maps, and records with the new name. If not budgeted for or considered unnecessary, these costs could become a financial concern (Section 1).
The section mentions that there are no direct financial implications; however, it still necessitates ensuring that no indirect costs are incurred without specification or clarity regarding budgeting. Therefore, the importance of clarifying any associated costs with updating references should be emphasized (Section 1).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section names the United States Postal Service facility at 2777 Brentwood Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the “Millie Dunn Veasey Post Office.” It also states that any mention of this facility in official documents will now use this new name.