Overview
Title
To impose an assessment related to fossil fuel emissions, to establish the Polluters Pay Climate Fund, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 is a plan where companies that make pollution from burning fossil fuels have to pay money, which will be used to help people and places stay safe from weather and climate problems. Part of this money is specially set aside to help communities that need it the most.
Summary AI
The H.R. 9573 - Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 proposes a tax on fossil fuel companies based on their carbon dioxide emissions since 2000, generating funds for climate resilience and adaptation efforts. The revenue from this tax would establish the Polluters Pay Climate Fund, supporting various initiatives, such as disaster recovery, infrastructure improvement, and environmental justice projects. It emphasizes protecting vulnerable communities from climate impacts and ensures that existing legal rights to seek damages from fossil fuel companies for climate-related harm are preserved. Additionally, the bill upholds state and local authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions independently.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024," seeks to address climate change by imposing a tax on companies involved in fossil fuel extraction and crude oil refining. The tax is calculated based on the carbon dioxide emissions attributed to each company since the year 2000. The revenue collected from this tax will be directed to the newly established Polluters Pay Climate Fund. The fund aims to support climate resilience, adaptation, and disaster response initiatives, with a significant portion earmarked for benefiting communities that are disproportionately impacted by climate change.
Significant Issues
One major issue with the bill is the potential economic impact of imposing a considerable tax burden of up to $1 trillion on the fossil fuel industry. This could lead to legal challenges, as the method for calculating tax liability is complex and relies on historical emissions data from 2000 to 2022, which might pose enforcement and compliance challenges.
Another concern is the lack of clear criteria for fund management and allocation. The bill mandates that 40% of the funds benefit environmental justice communities, but it does not provide specific guidelines for distribution, risking inefficiencies and potential public backlash. Furthermore, the broad definitions and lack of specificity regarding terms such as "climate resilience" and "environmental justice" could lead to subjective interpretations and misallocation of resources.
Impact on the Public
The passage of this bill may have widespread implications for both the economy and the environment. By holding the fossil fuel industry financially accountable for greenhouse gas emissions, the bill could incentivize companies to adopt cleaner energy practices. However, the substantial tax could lead to increased operational costs, potentially causing higher energy prices for consumers. Additionally, the bill's focus on improving climate resilience and addressing environmental justice could lead to improved living conditions in vulnerable communities that have historically been overburdened by pollution.
Impact on Stakeholders
For the fossil fuel industry, the bill represents a significant financial burden and a shift in regulatory expectations. Companies may need to navigate complex tax calculations and compliance requirements, which could strain resources and lead to financial disadvantages. Conversely, the renewable energy sector may benefit from an increased push toward sustainable energy practices, potentially resulting in a boost for green technology investments and innovations.
Vulnerable communities stand to gain from the bill's emphasis on environmental justice. The allocation of resources to these areas could lead to enhanced infrastructure, healthier living conditions, and greater resilience against climate-related impacts. Nevertheless, the lack of specific distribution guidelines might lead to concerns about whether the funds will be equitably and effectively applied.
Overall, the Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 represents a bold effort to shift the financial responsibility of climate mitigation onto the polluters. While its intentions align with global climate goals, the practical challenges of implementation, economic implications, and the necessity for precise regulatory definitions warrant careful consideration by lawmakers and stakeholders alike.
Financial Assessment
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 introduces several financial components aimed at addressing climate change impacts. This commentary will outline the bill's key financial aspects and examine how they relate to the issues identified.
Financial Allocations and Tax Impositions
The bill imposes a significant tax burden on fossil fuel companies based on their greenhouse gas emissions since 2000. It outlines a tax that correlates with a portion of $1 trillion total liability. This represents a major financial initiative that is intended to reflect the scale of the climate challenge. The tax is designed to be proportional to each company's share of carbon dioxide emissions, potentially leading to complex compliance and legal challenges, as identified in the issues concerning intricate calculation mechanisms. These complexities might raise economic and administrative concerns.
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund
Revenue from the imposed tax will establish the Polluters Pay Climate Fund. This fund is envisioned as a financial resource for addressing climate resilience, adaptation, disaster recovery, and for fostering environmental justice. One of the critical elements is that 40 percent of the fund is mandated to benefit environmental justice communities. Such a targeted allocation underscores the focus on vulnerable populations but presents challenges in terms of well-defined criteria for distribution, potentially leading to perceptions of unfairness or inefficiencies.
The fund also commits to specific uses, such as providing at least $15 billion to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for climate-related disaster programs, of which $3 billion is allocated to the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program. Additionally, a minimum of $6 billion is directed to grants and technical assistance under the Clean Air Act. While these allocations demonstrate the bill's commitment to tangible climate change interventions, the lack of precise criteria and transparent management strategies may lead to the potential misallocation of resources, echoing concerns over accountability and favoritism.
Installment Payments and Financial Burden
The bill allows fossil fuel companies to pay their tax liabilities in installments over a period of nine years, with a structured payment schedule that intensively front-loads 20 percent in the first year and 10 percent annually thereafter. This flexibility aims to ease the financial impact on companies but introduces potential legal and practical complications, especially regarding accelerated payments if businesses undergo significant changes like mergers or liquidations.
Conclusion
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024 attempts to balance the substantial financial responsibility of addressing climate change with a structured approach involving taxes on fossil fuel emissions. While it lays out ambitious financial allocations to tackle climate issues, this could lead to complex challenges, from calculating and enforcing tax liabilities to ensuring fair and effective use of the fund for environmental justice and climate resilience efforts. Without clear and transparent criteria for managing and disbursing these financial resources, the bill could face significant scrutiny and challenges regarding its effectiveness and fairness.
Issues
The imposition of a significant tax burden of up to $1 trillion related to greenhouse gas emissions (Section 3) raises concerns about its economic impact and potential legal challenges, especially considering the complex calculation methods used for determining the tax liability of each assessable person.
The criteria and methods for managing and allocating funds from the Polluters Pay Climate Fund (Section 4) are not well-defined, leading to potential inefficiencies, favoritism, or misallocation, especially with complex terms like 'environmental justice' and 'climate resilience' lacking clear definitions.
The provision allowing installment payments for taxes (Section 4691) could create legal and practical complications, particularly with the accelerated payment clause, which could impact businesses undergoing structural changes like mergers or sales.
The requirement that 40 percent of the Polluters Pay Climate Fund be used for environmental justice communities (Section 4) lacks clear distribution criteria, risking inconsistent application and potential public backlash if perceived as unfair or ineffective.
The broad definition of 'covered carbon dioxide emissions' over a wide timeframe (2000-2022) in Section 4691 could lead to enforcement and compliance challenges due to the extensive historical data required.
The lack of explicit criteria for what constitutes a 'polluter' in terms of contributions to the Polluters Pay Climate Fund (Section 9512) could lead to ambiguities in its application, potentially affecting accountability and fairness in financial contributions.
The complexity in defining specific carbon dioxide equivalences for different fossil fuels (Section 4691) might lead to enforcement challenges, particularly if businesses find these calculations difficult to interpret or contest.
The stipulation that taxes imposed under Section 4691 are not deductible (Section 3) adds an additional financial burden to businesses without any tax relief, which might be contested by affected entities.
The document does not specify which entities are responsible for managing and auditing the Polluters Pay Climate Fund (Section 9512), potentially leading to accountability issues and misuse of funds.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section gives the name of the law, which is called the "Polluters Pay Climate Fund Act of 2024".
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress acknowledges that climate change poses a significant threat to the U.S. and outlines the need for protective measures, emphasizing support for vulnerable communities. The section highlights the substantial financial burden of climate change, the responsibility of fossil fuel companies to contribute more to mitigation efforts, and the clarification that the Act's assessments are not intended to assign fault or affect accountability proceedings.
Money References
- Congress finds that— (1) climate change, resulting primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels, is an immediate, grave threat to the communities, environment, and economy of the United States; (2) severe consequences of climate change have already materialized in the United States, including rising sea levels, increasing temperatures, extreme weather events, flooding, heat waves, loss of biodiversity, and other climate change-driven ecosystem threats; (3) the Federal Government jointly with States and localities must develop and implement protective measures to counteract the adverse effects of climate change, protect communities, and build resilience to extreme weather; (4) the government response must include protections for communities that are most vulnerable to climate change impacts, especially communities of color, low-income communities, and Tribal and Indigenous communities that are also more likely to have experienced systemic disinvestment and be overburdened by fossil fuel pollution; (5) the protective measures necessary to respond to the adverse effects of climate change in the United States will require trillions of dollars of new investment during the decade after the date of enactment of this Act; (6) climate change related extreme weather events, such as those described in paragraph (2), cost the United States at least $150,000,000,000 each year and disproportionately affect underserved and overburdened communities, according to the Fifth National Climate Assessment; (7) the $100,000,000,000 each year that fossil fuel companies are collectively assessed for the Polluters Pay Climate Fund established in this Act represents only a small portion of the total cost to the Federal Government to respond to climate change related extreme weather events and make needed climate change adaptation and resilience investments; (8) peer-reviewed research can now determine with great accuracy the share of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by the operations and products of specific fossil fuel companies, which is what informs the formulas to determine carbon dioxide emissions that are used in the amendments made by this Act; (9) the fossil fuel industry has been aware of the central role that their product plays in causing climate change since before the year 2000; (10) the fossil fuel industry must now increase their contribution to government expenditures to protect the Nation from climate disaster; and (11) this Act and assessments under the amendments made by this Act are not intended— (A) to be a determination of fault; or (B) to have any impact on the ability of any person or other government to hold polluters accountable for harms caused. ---
3. Tax relating to current stock of greenhouse gas emissions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a tax on businesses involved in extracting fossil fuels or refining crude oil in the U.S., based on their carbon dioxide emissions since 2000 if they exceed 1 billion metric tons. It specifies how the tax is calculated, payment options, and includes provisions for installment payments, joint liability for related businesses, and adjustments in specific cases.
Money References
- — “(1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to each assessable person, the tax under this section shall be equal to an amount that bears the same ratio to $1,000,000,000,000 as— “(A) the assessable person's applicable share of covered carbon dioxide emissions taken into account under this section, bears to “(B) the aggregate applicable shares of covered carbon dioxide emissions of all assessable persons taken into account under this section. “
4691. Imposition of tax Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a tax imposed on individuals or groups involved in extracting fossil fuels or refining crude oil in the U.S. if they exceed a specified amount of carbon dioxide emissions between 2000 and 2022. The tax amount for each liable entity is calculated based on their share of total emissions and can be paid in installments, with specific rules on liability and conditions for non-payment.
Money References
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to each assessable person, the tax under this section shall be equal to an amount that bears the same ratio to $1,000,000,000,000 as— (A) the assessable person's applicable share of covered carbon dioxide emissions taken into account under this section, bears to (B) the aggregate applicable shares of covered carbon dioxide emissions of all assessable persons taken into account under this section.
4. Polluters Pay Climate Fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Polluters Pay Climate Fund section establishes a trust fund in the U.S. Treasury aimed at addressing climate change and enhancing environmental justice. This fund, consisting of tax-derived amounts, is used for various initiatives such as disaster recovery, climate resilience in multiple sectors, and energy and public health improvements, with a stipulation that 40% of the funds benefit communities disproportionately impacted by climate issues.
Money References
- — (A) GENERAL PURPOSES.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator and the heads of other relevant agencies, shall use amounts in the Fund for the purposes of furthering a comprehensive and equitable Federal response to climate change impacts through investments in climate resilience, adaptation, disaster response, and environmental justice, including— (i) climate-related disaster recovery and mitigation support; (ii) climate change adaptation support through climate and disaster planning assistance, funding for climate-resilient infrastructure, and improved climate and extreme weather prediction capabilities; (iii) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of energy systems through energy efficiency, grid resilience, and distributed electricity generation initiatives; (iv) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of the food system through support for climate-resilient farming practices; (v) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of the transportation system through planning and climate change adaptation support; (vi) initiatives that increase the climate resilience of ecosystems through conservation, restoration, and wildfire management activities; (vii) support for climate-related public health initiatives, including efforts to address extreme heat; and (viii) initiatives that increase the climate resiliency of drinking water and stormwater infrastructure. (B) SPECIFIED USES.—In carrying out subparagraph (A) each fiscal year and to the greatest extent practicable, the Secretary shall use amounts in the Fund— (i) to provide funding of not less than $15,000,000,000 to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for response and resilience programs of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to address climate-related disasters, including hurricanes, flooding, extreme heat, and wildfires, of which not less than $3,000,000,000 shall be used to carry out the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program under section 203 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133); and (ii) to provide funding of not less than $6,000,000,000 for grants and technical assistance under section 138 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7438), subject to the condition that the Administrator may determine the appropriate amounts to be used for those grants and that technical assistance. (C) ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE SET ASIDE.—Of the amounts appropriated from the Fund each fiscal year, 40 percent shall be used for investments that benefit environmental justice communities. (D) SELECTION.—For the purpose of determining how to award amounts appropriated from the Fund in excess of the amounts required to be used under subparagraph (B), the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator and the heads of other relevant agencies, shall establish selection criteria, which shall give the highest priority to projects or other activities that are most impactful in achieving the purposes described in subparagraph (A), as determined by the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator and the heads of other relevant agencies.
9512. Polluters Pay Climate Fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes the "Polluters Pay Climate Fund" within the U.S. Treasury, which will consist of money allocated to it as specified in certain sections. It also states that funds will be available for specific purposes according to other legislative acts, funded by taxes collected as described in section 4691.
5. Availability of remedies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill clarifies that this Act does not protect anyone from being liable under other laws for issues related to climate change, such as deception or damages caused by fossil fuels. Additionally, it specifies that funds from the Polluters Pay Climate Fund cannot be used as evidence in such claims or to reduce damages awarded in legal actions.
6. Non-preemption of authorities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act does not override or replace any state or local laws or programs, particularly those dealing with greenhouse gas emissions, monitoring, climate adaptation, or investigations related to these issues.