Overview
Title
An Act To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the availability of civil actions affected by United States sanctions, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill is like a rule that says people can't use U.S. courts to ask for money if they had agreements with others and those agreements got messed up because of U.S. rules against certain countries. It's to help make sure people in the U.S. aren't punished just for following these government rules.
Summary AI
H.R. 9563, titled the “Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2024,” aims to prevent people from suing in U.S. federal courts for claims related to contracts affected by U.S. sanctions imposed after the contract was made. The bill ensures that U.S. persons are not put at a disadvantage due to efforts to comply with U.S. sanctions and export controls, and it restricts foreign entities from seeking compensation related to actions by U.S. persons complying with these sanctions. The bill also clarifies that it does not affect the rights of victims of international terrorism or similar acts to pursue legal action.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the "Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2024," aims to amend title 28 of the United States Code to limit the availability of civil actions affected by United States sanctions. The bill seeks to safeguard American individuals and entities by ensuring they are not unfairly disadvantaged when complying with U.S. sanctions and export controls, while also preventing foreign individuals from gaining compensation in certain situations related to these sanctions.
General Summary
The primary goal of the bill is to restrict lawsuits in Federal court concerning claims linked to U.S. sanctions that hinder contracts, provided these sanctions were imposed after the contractual agreements were made. Additionally, the bill clarifies that it does not alter the President's authority to enforce legal actions or restrict the rights of victims in serious criminal cases, such as terrorism or torture.
Significant Issues
A central issue with the bill is its broad definition of "United States sanctions," which could lead to ambiguity in the law's application. This wide-ranging interpretation might affect numerous situations unpredictably and result in uncertain legal implications. Additionally, the bill's limitation on civil actions may prevent individuals or entities from seeking legal remedies, even if they are adversely and unfairly affected by sanctions.
Another concern is the lack of clear guidelines in how the policies will be enforced or monitored, specifically in regards to ensuring that U.S. persons are "not disadvantaged." This could lead to different interpretations and pose challenges in implementation. Moreover, the bill could have international implications, potentially provoking reciprocal actions by other nations, although this is not expressly addressed in the text.
Public Impact
For the general public, the enactment of this bill could mean fewer legal disputes arising from contracts affected by U.S. sanctions. However, it also raises questions about access to legal recourse, particularly for those indirectly impacted by such sanctions. The ambiguity surrounding the bill's terms and enforcement could affect public confidence in fair application and interpretation of law, leading to potential legal uncertainty.
Stakeholder Impact
Positive Impacts:
- U.S. entities: Companies and individuals complying in good faith with U.S. sanctions may find relief in the decreased risk of litigation resulting from contractual disruptions caused by those sanctions.
- Executive branch: The preservation of the President's authority aids in maintaining flexibility to respond to international and domestic legal challenges stemming from sanction enforcement.
Negative Impacts:
- Individuals and businesses abroad: Foreign entities could see this as limiting their ability to seek legal remedy in U.S. courts, which could affect international business relations and potentially hinder economic engagements.
- Humanitarian and non-profit organizations: If inadvertently impacted by sanctions, these entities might find themselves with restricted avenues for addressing disruptions, potentially hindering their operations.
In conclusion, while the legislation aims to protect U.S. interests in the face of international pressures, it poses significant questions concerning legal clarity, international relations, and access to justice. Addressing these concerns may require further refinement or additional legislative or regulatory guidance to ensure balanced and effective implementation.
Issues
The broad definition of 'United States sanctions' in Section 1660 could lead to ambiguity in its application, potentially affecting a wide range of situations in unpredictable ways. This broadness may include prohibitions or conditions imposed under various laws, which might lead to uncertain legal interpretations and implications. (Section 3, Section 1660)
The limitation on civil actions in Section 1660 may disproportionately impact individuals or entities affected by the sanctions without providing them an avenue for legal recourse, potentially causing undue hardship. This restriction could inhibit access to justice for parties who may be indirectly impacted by sanctions. (Section 3, Section 1660)
The Act does not provide clear guidelines for enforcement or monitoring of policies stated in Section 2, which may lead to implementation challenges. Specifically, the lack of detail in how to ensure that U.S. persons are 'not disadvantaged' leaves room for varying interpretations and potential inconsistencies. (Section 2)
The policy stated in Section 2 could have implications for international relations, as it might provoke reciprocal legal or diplomatic actions by other countries. This aspect is not addressed in the bill, potentially affecting U.S. diplomatic interests. (Section 2)
The preservation of authority for the President and delegates to restrict or authorize legal services in Section 1660(b)(1) might lack sufficient checks and balances, possibly leading to concerns about overreach in executive decision-making. (Section 1660)
The Act fails to address potential scenarios where contracts may have been renegotiated in anticipation of sanctions, creating possible loopholes for enforcement and complicating the legal landscape for contracts affected by U.S. sanctions. (Section 1660)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes its official short title as the "Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2024".
2. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The policy of the United States aims to protect American individuals from being harmed when following U.S. sanctions and export rules and to ensure that foreign individuals cannot get compensated for actions related to Americans trying to follow these rules honestly.
3. Limitation on civil actions affected by United States sanctions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a rule preventing people from filing civil lawsuits in Federal court for claims arising from a contract affected by U.S. sanctions that were imposed after the contract was made. It also clarifies that this rule does not restrict certain authorities of the President or legal remedies for victims of terrorism or related crimes.
1660. Limitation on civil actions affected by United States sanctions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Notably, this law prevents individuals from suing in Federal court for claims arising from U.S. sanctions that make performing a contract difficult when those sanctions were imposed after the contract was made. However, it does not limit the President's power to enforce legal actions or the rights of victims in serious cases like terrorism or torture.