Overview
Title
To require the inclusion of an authorization of appropriations for the Department of Veterans Affairs in any authorization for use of military force or declaration of war.
ELI5 AI
The Full Cost of War Act says that whenever the U.S. decides to go to war or use military force, it also needs to make sure they have money set aside to help take care of veterans, like making sure they get medical care or money if they get hurt. How much money they need will be decided by the people in charge of the military and veterans' services.
Summary AI
The Full Cost of War Act requires that any new approval of military force or declaration of war also include funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs. This funding will cover medical care, disability payments, and other benefits for veterans affected by the military actions. The necessary amounts will be determined by the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 9562, known as the "Full Cost of War Act," is a legislative proposal introduced in the United States House of Representatives. The bill mandates that any new authorization for military force or declaration of war must include provisions for funding the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This funding is intended to cover medical care, disability compensation, and other necessary benefits for veterans. The decision on the required funding amount is to be jointly determined by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Significant Issues
One notable issue with the bill is its use of the phrase "such sums as may be necessary" regarding appropriations for the VA. This wording is vague and potentially leads to open-ended financial commitments without a clear cap or detailed budgetary guidelines. Consequently, it raises concerns about the potential for undefined and possibly wasteful spending. Additionally, the bill does not specify criteria for determining "any other earned benefit needed," leaving room for subjective interpretations. Moreover, the bill lacks any clear process or oversight mechanism to monitor these expenditures, which could lead to inefficiencies and a lack of accountability.
Impact on the Public
At a high level, the bill aims to address the financial needs associated with supporting veterans once military actions are authorized. This provision acknowledges that engaging in military conflicts often results in increased demands on veteran support systems. If efficiently and properly implemented, these measures could ensure that veterans receive timely and adequate compensation and care. However, vague language and lack of financial oversight could lead to financial inefficiencies, potentially affecting public funds and raising taxes or diverting resources from other public needs.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For veterans, particularly those involved in new military operations, the bill represents a positive step toward ensuring they receive necessary support after their service. By legally mandating funding as part of any military authorization, it potentially provides a more stable and predictable source of support.
On the other hand, those responsible for budget oversight—such as policy analysts and financial officers—may find the lack of specific spending guidelines challenging. Without clear caps or criteria, they may struggle to create effective budgets or justify expenditures. Program administrators may also face difficulties implementing benefits due to ambiguous definitions of what constitutes necessary or earned benefits.
In summary, while the intent of the "Full Cost of War Act" is clearly aligned with veteran support, practical execution issues may undermine its objectives. Legislation might benefit from clearer budgetary guidelines and oversight mechanisms to ensure that public resources are used effectively and serve the intended veteran population efficiently.
Issues
The provision in Section 2 requires an authorization of appropriations for the Department of Veterans Affairs without specifying a funding cap or detailed budgetary requirements, potentially leading to undefined and wasteful spending.
The phrase 'such sums as may be necessary' in Section 2 is vague and could lead to open-ended appropriations without clear guidelines or limitations, raising concerns over financial accountability.
Section 2 does not provide specific assessment criteria for determining 'any other earned benefit needed,' leaving room for subjective interpretations and potential inconsistencies in benefit provision.
There is no clear process or oversight mechanism outlined in Section 2 for calculating or monitoring expenditures, which could result in inefficiencies or a lack of accountability in the funding process.
Section 1 is very brief and lacks detailed content, making it difficult to analyze potential issues related to spending or favoritism, thereby potentially leading to misunderstandings about the scope and impact of the bill.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it may be referred to as the "Full Cost of War Act."
2. Requirement for authorizations for use of military force and declarations of war Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any new laws allowing military force or declaring war must also include funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs to ensure veterans receive necessary medical care, disability compensation, and other benefits, as determined by the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs.