Overview
Title
To authorize funding of enriched resident services in federally assisted affordable housing, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 9553 is a plan to give money to groups that help people living in affordable housing to get things like health services, learning, and support to live on their own. It mainly wants to help groups that don't make a profit and provide different community services.
Summary AI
H. R. 9553 aims to establish a grant program to support enriched services for residents in federally assisted affordable housing. The bill proposes that the Secretary of Health and Human Services provide competitive grants to entities experienced in managing these properties or delivering resident supportive services, as well as tribes and tribal organizations. Grants, which last for five years, would support activities like increasing access to health services, educational opportunities, economic self-sufficiency programs, and services aiding older adults and residents with disabilities to live independently. The bill places emphasis on awarding grants to nonprofit entities and those who provide a wide range of community services.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, H.R. 9553, titled the "Affordable Housing Resident Services Act," seeks to authorize the funding of enhanced services for residents living in federally assisted affordable housing. Introduced in the House of Representatives on September 12, 2024, by Mr. Aguilar and a supporting group of representatives, the bill aims to establish a grant program managed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The objective is to provide various supportive services to residents of qualified properties, contributing to improved living standards and opportunities for financial and social advancement.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill outlines the creation of the Affordable Housing Resident Services Grant Program. This program is intended to support organizations that have a track record of managing housing properties or providing resident services, including tribal entities. The grant funds are envisioned to cover activities that increase access to health, education, and financial resources, promote self-sufficiency, and support aging-in-place for older adults and independent living for persons with disabilities. Entities that receive funding cannot compel residents to use the provided services, ensuring participation remains voluntary. Additionally, the bill highlights that not less than 25% of any grant funds must be allocated toward the compensation and training of service coordinators.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several critical issues have been noted within the bill. Firstly, the statute grants priority to mission-driven, non-profit entities, potentially sidelining for-profit entities that might offer equivalent or superior services, therefore impacting competitive diversity among service providers. Further, the section regarding eligible activities allows for broad discretion by the Director, which could introduce ambiguity and inconsistency.
The designation of qualified properties is also subject to the Director's discretion without clear parameters, raising concerns about potential bias and inconsistent application. The use of vaguely defined terms, such as "capacity building," may lead to varied interpretations, affecting how resources are allocated.
Lastly, while the bill mandates the publication of program outcomes on a public website, it fails to ensure the accuracy or accountability of this information, posing risks of misinformation.
Impact on the Public
The bill holds the potential to significantly benefit residents of affordable housing by enhancing access to necessary services and fostering conditions for improved quality of life. By targeting health services, educational opportunities, and economic self-sufficiency initiatives, the legislation could empower residents to achieve greater independence and well-being.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Mission-Driven Entities: Non-profit organizations stand to benefit from prioritized access to grant funding, allowing them to extend and enhance their service offerings. However, this focus on non-profits might inadvertently disadvantage for-profit entities that could effectively deliver similar services, potentially stifling innovation and efficiency.
Residents: For the residents of federally assisted housing, the voluntary nature of the services ensures personal agency and choice. Successful implementation of this program could result in improved access to healthcare, education, and economic resources, with a specific emphasis on support for aging individuals and those with disabilities.
Providers and Coordinators: Service coordinators, the professionals tasked with implementing the supportive services, may benefit from increased funding for salaries and training, fostering professional development and enhancing service quality.
Government Entities: The discretion afforded to the Director, while meant to provide flexibility, may lead to challenges in oversight and accountability, requiring robust systems to ensure fair and consistent implementation across different settings.
In conclusion, H.R. 9553 demonstrates a commitment to improving the lives of residents in federally assisted housing through targeted services. However, specific aspects of the bill require careful consideration and potential adjustments to ensure fair, effective, and accountable implementation, providing both for the public's benefit and the optimization of stakeholder contributions.
Issues
The provision in Section 2(b)(2) that gives priority to mission-driven, non-profit entities might create an imbalance or bias against for-profit entities that could provide similar or superior services, potentially affecting the diversity and competitiveness of service providers.
Subsection 2(e)(1)(G) allows for 'an additional activity as determined appropriate by the Director' without specifying criteria, which could result in ambiguous interpretations and inconsistent application, affecting transparency and fairness.
Subsection 2(f)(2) gives the Director the discretion to determine what qualifies as 'qualified properties,' without clearly defined parameters, which could lead to inconsistent application and potential bias in the selection of properties.
The repeated use of the term 'Director' in Section 2 without clearly defining the responsibilities or limitations of their discretion might lead to confusion or inconsistency in program implementation, impacting accountability and oversight.
The language in subsection 2(i)(2) regarding 'capacity building' is vague and could allow for varied interpretations of what activities qualify, which may impact effective allocation of resources.
Subsection 2(j) requires the Director to post the impacts and activities on a public website but does not specify checks for accuracy or accountability, potentially leading to misinformation or lack of public trust.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states the short title, which is “Affordable Housing Resident Services Act.”
2. Affordable housing resident services grant program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Affordable Housing Resident Services Grant Program is designed to provide funding to organizations with experience in managing housing properties or offering resident services, including tribes and tribal organizations. Grants are awarded to support activities like health service access, education, and financial literacy for residents, and special consideration is given to nonprofit entities.