Overview
Title
To establish a limit on increases in total Federal spending, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The “Stop Bankrupting Our Country Act” is a plan to keep the U.S. from spending too much money by limiting the amount the government can spend each year, unless lots of people in charge say it's okay to spend more. If they spend too much, they have to find ways to save money, kind of like when mom and dad have to cut back on buying things if they spend too much.
Summary AI
H.R. 9519, known as the “Stop Bankrupting Our Country Act,” aims to limit the growth of total Federal spending in the U.S. starting from fiscal year 2025. It proposes that annual Federal expenditures cannot exceed the previous year's amount, adjusted only for inflation and national population growth. However, Congress can vote with a two-thirds majority to increase this spending cap. If spending surpasses this cap, an automatic cutback, or sequestration, will be implemented to reduce expenses equitably across Federal accounts, with some exemptions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "Stop Bankrupting Our Country Act," aims to implement a cap on the growth of federal spending. Beginning in fiscal year 2025, it proposes that federal expenditures for any fiscal year should not exceed the expenditures from the previous year, adjusted by an average percentage increase in inflation and population changes over the last three years. This bill introduces a mechanism where, if spending exceeds the prescribed limit, automatic spending cuts, termed as sequestration, would be applied uniformly across most federal accounts. However, there is a provision for Congress to bypass this limit with a two-thirds majority vote.
Significant Issues
Calculation and Transparency
One of the primary issues with the bill revolves around the transparency and clarity of how the spending cap is calculated. It bases the increase on average changes in inflation and population over the past three years, which may not be straightforward for public understanding. Clear definitions and methodologies are essential since these calculations affect the federal budget’s growth rate.
Exceptions and Political Influence
The bill allows Congress to exceed the set spending cap with a two-thirds majority vote. While this provides a mechanism to address urgent needs or unforeseen expenses, it also opens avenues for political bargaining, potentially undermining the bill's objective to contain federal spending consistently.
Definitions and Data Reliance
There is ambiguity in defining "federal expenditures," as the bill excludes net interest payments but does not specify other exceptions. Additionally, the dependency on data from federal agencies, such as the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Bureau of the Census, poses challenges. If there are delays or discrepancies in the data, it could affect budget accuracy and enforcement.
Sequestration Process
The sequestration procedure, intended to control expenditures exceeding the cap, involves a uniform percentage cut across accounts. This process can be complex and may inadvertently impact essential government services or programs. Moreover, the bill references exemptions under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, but lacks clarity on which specific accounts are exempt.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact
The imposition of a spending cap may initially appear as a prudent fiscal responsibility measure. For the general public, it signals an effort to control national debt and limit government size. However, the potential for automatic cuts in services if spending exceeds the cap raises concerns. Programs on education, healthcare, and other public services might experience budget restraints, affecting service delivery and access.
Stakeholders and Specific Impacts
Federal Agencies and Programs: Agencies may face unpredictability in budget allocations, impairing their ability to plan long-term initiatives and manage ongoing projects. Programs meant to support vulnerable populations might be at risk if significant budget cuts are implemented without careful assessment.
Economists and Fiscal Policymakers: The bill presents both a challenge and an opportunity. On one hand, it requires credible projection of economic indicators to determine budget limits; on the other hand, it underlines the necessity for careful evaluation before making exceptions to the spending cap.
Legislators: While the bill restricts fiscal growth, it also empowers legislators with the ability to circumvent limits through majority votes, demanding accountability and responsibility in decision-making to ensure exceptions are justified and transparent.
In conclusion, the proposed bill envisions placing restraints on the growth of federal spending, positing a measure that could lead to greater fiscal discipline. However, its implementation poses several challenges, particularly in terms of clarity, transparency, and potential impacts on essential governmental functions and public services. As such, it demands rigorous scrutiny and strategic planning to ensure that fiscal prudence does not come at the expense of critical public needs.
Issues
The calculation of the spending limit increase is based on the average inflation change and average change in national population over multiple years, which might lack clarity and transparency (Section 2). These calculations are crucial as they directly influence the federal budgetcap.
The bill allows for exceptions to the spending limit increase through a two-thirds majority vote in Congress (Section 2(a)(2)). This might undermine the bill's effectiveness in controlling federal spending, as it introduces potential for political negotiation and inconsistency in fiscal discipline.
The definitions provided for 'Federal expenditures' exclude net interest payments but do not specify other exceptions or limitations clearly enough, causing potential ambiguity in what constitutes total expenditure (Section 2(c)(1)).
The reliance on data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census for inflation and population figures introduces concerns if there are discrepancies or delays in reporting, potentially affecting budget accuracy and enforcement of limits (Section 2(c)(2) & (3)).
The language concerning the rescission process, particularly the application of a uniform percentage across accounts to achieve rescission, may be complex and challenging to execute accurately, potentially affecting government programs and services (Section 2(b)(2)).
There is a lack of clarity on which accounts are exempt from the sequestration under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, possibly leading to uncertainties in budget planning and execution (Section 2(b)(2)(A)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that it can be referred to as the “Stop Bankrupting Our Country Act.”
2. Limit on growth of Federal spending Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill proposes a rule to limit the growth of Federal spending starting in fiscal year 2025. The rule states that each year's spending cannot increase by more than the combined average percentage change in inflation and national population over the past three years, unless Congress votes for an exception. If the spending limit is exceeded, an automatic spending cut will be applied uniformly across all accounts, except those exempt by existing laws.