Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Education to deem each month for which certain Federal student loans are in deferment during a period of active duty service as months counted toward public service loan forgiveness, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9517 wants to help soldiers by counting the time they pause paying back their student loans when they're on duty as part of the time needed to forgive their loans. It also asks important people to work together to make sure this happens smoothly and safely.
Summary AI
H.R. 9517 aims to assist military members with student loan forgiveness. It requires that any month a federal student loan is deferred during active duty service counts toward the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. The bill also mandates collaboration between the Secretary of Education and the Secretary of Defense to identify eligible borrowers and ensure payments are counted without additional action from the recipients. Additionally, they must report to Congress on the implementation progress and suggest improvements for how armed forces and Department of Defense employees are treated within the loan forgiveness program.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as H.R. 9517, aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to help individuals engaged in active military service. It directs the Secretary of Education to count any month in which a federal student loan is deferred during active military duty as if the borrower had made a loan payment, thereby making these months eligible towards public service loan forgiveness. Additionally, the bill mandates annual data matching between the Department of Defense and the Department of Education to identify qualifying individuals and streamline the verification of their eligible loan repayments. Furthermore, the bill requires a report to Congress detailing the implementation progress and suggesting improvements or additional resources needed.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues surface within the bill’s provisions. Firstly, the amendment granting preferential treatment in loan forgiveness to military personnel might inadvertently disadvantage other public service workers not covered by the specific language. Secondly, the data matching process prescribed between the two departments lacks robust provisions for data privacy and security, which could lead to unauthorized access to personal information. Additionally, the language used in the bill, specifically regarding terms like "forbearance" and "deferment," may be complex for the average person to comprehend. Furthermore, there is no indication of an allocated budget for carrying out the data matching activity, which raises questions about potential resource waste.
Impact on the Public Broadly
Broadly, the bill intends to promote fairness in pursuit of educational benefits for those who sacrifice for their country. By acknowledging the service of military personnel in the context of loan forgiveness, it potentially lowers the financial burden on those serving in active duty. However, the bill’s focus on military members might spark debate about equality among various public service roles that also contribute significantly to society.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The most apparent beneficiaries of the bill are military personnel with student loans, as it provides them an added advantage in achieving loan forgiveness. This can notably lessen their financial stress and enhance morale. On the other hand, non-military public service employees might view this legislation as introducing an imbalance in how public service contributions are valued, potentially causing dissatisfaction among sectors like education or healthcare.
For the Departments of Defense and Education, the requirement for systematic data matching introduces operational demands, including ensuring data security, coordinating cross-departmental activities, and resolving potential disputes in implementation. This could also imply necessity for budget allocations and policy adjustments.
In summary, while H.R. 9517 aligns with the laudable goal of supporting active duty service members, it raises several nuances and challenges that underscore the complexity of equitably expanding benefits across different public service sectors.
Issues
The amendment in Section 1 to allow deferment periods during active duty to count towards public service loan forgiveness could result in an unintended advantage to military personnel over other public service workers not covered under this amendment, creating a disparity in benefits among different sectors of public service.
Section 2 mandates a data matching process involving personal information from the Department of Defense and the Department of Education, yet it lacks specific provisions for ensuring data privacy and security, raising significant concerns about potential mishandling or unauthorized access to sensitive personal data.
The language in Section 1 is complex and employs terms like 'forbearance' and 'deferment,' which might be difficult for the average person to understand, potentially leading to confusion about eligibility and benefits.
Section 2 does not specify the budget or funding required to implement the data matching process, which could lead to concerns about wasteful spending and resource allocation in the administration of this program.
The report to Congress required in Section 3 lacks specificity regarding the metrics or criteria for evaluating the implementation of the bill, potentially leading to ambiguity in assessing the bill's effectiveness and outcomes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Active duty deferment periods counted toward public service loan forgiveness Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 455(m) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 has been amended to count months when a borrower’s student loan payments are deferred or in forbearance due to active military duty as payments made for the purpose of qualifying for public service loan forgiveness.
2. Ensuring access to certain higher education benefits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires the Secretaries of Defense and Education to collaborate annually in identifying Department of Defense employees who made student loan payments eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness since 2007. They must also certify the individual’s employment duration and tally their qualifying payments without needing additional input from the employee.
3. Report to Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Education are required to submit a report to Congress within one year of the law's enactment. This report should include updates on how the new rules are being applied and suggest ways to better support military members and Defense Department staff in getting their student loans forgiven, highlighting any extra resources or powers needed.