Overview
Title
To direct the use of artificial intelligence by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to adapt to extreme weather, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The TAME Extreme Weather Act is like giving NOAA special computer helpers to predict weather and wildfires better, helping people stay safe. Plus, they can team up with schools and companies to share what they learn and make weather forecasts even better, just like sharing toys and ideas with friends.
Summary AI
H. R. 9498, also known as the "TAME Extreme Weather Act," aims to boost the use of artificial intelligence in weather-related activities conducted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The bill directs the administration to develop advanced AI systems for weather forecasting, analyzing emissions, and predicting wildfires to improve public safety and awareness. Furthermore, it encourages partnerships with private and academic entities for innovative developments in weather predictions and mandates the sharing of relevant data with the public, ensuring protections for national security and intellectual property rights. The act seeks to enhance NOAA's workforce by collaborating with private sector experts and providing training in AI utilization for improved weather forecasts.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Transformational Artificial Intelligence to Modernize the Economy against Extreme Weather Act," or the "TAME Extreme Weather Act," is a legislative proposal directing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) for enhancing weather forecasting capabilities. The bill encompasses various sections, including definitions, development of weather forecasting datasets, applications of advanced AI in weather predictions, technical assistance on AI weather models, fire environment modeling, emissions monitoring, partnerships for innovation, workforce expertise, and public data access. The objective is to harness AI's potential in adapting to extreme weather conditions, improving forecasting accuracy, and delivering impactful information to the public.
Summary of Significant Issues
A recurring issue in the bill is the lack of clearly defined financial limits or budgets, which could result in unchecked or wasteful spending, particularly in sections related to AI applications and the workforce. Another concern is the discretion given to the Administrator in selecting technical experts and partners without defined criteria, raising the risk of favoritism. The bill also lacks specific metrics and performance indicators, making it challenging to evaluate the success of the AI applications and innovations intended to enhance weather forecasting. Moreover, environmental impact considerations are vaguely addressed without specific guidelines, potentially overlooking ecological responsibility. Additionally, some terms related to intellectual property and data rights are ambiguous, possibly leading to legal disputes.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The bill holds significant potential to positively impact the public by improving weather forecasts, which can enhance preparedness for extreme weather events, potentially saving lives and reducing property damage. The integration of AI could offer quicker, more accurate weather predictions, enabling better-informed decision-making by individuals and government agencies. However, the financial implications of the bill are not clearly outlined, which might lead to ineffective use of taxpayer funds if not properly managed. Moreover, the public's expectation for transparency and accountability might not be fully met due to unclear performance metrics and decision-making processes.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For NOAA and its workforce, the bill provides opportunities to advance technological expertise and foster innovation through partnerships with private and academic entities. This could lead to professional growth and enhance the agency's operational capabilities. However, the broad discretion given in partnership and expert selection processes could lead to concerns about fairness and equitable opportunity distribution, potentially affecting stakeholders outside the chosen partnerships. Environmental groups may view the bill as an opportunity to address ecological concerns through better climate and emissions monitoring, although they might also critique the vague environmental responsibility measures. On the legal front, the lack of clarity on intellectual property rights and data access could pose challenges for legal professionals and rights holders involved in implementing the bill's provisions.
Issues
The lack of clearly defined financial limits or budgets across various sections (e.g., Sections 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9) could lead to unchecked or wasteful spending, raising financial concerns about the overall implementation of the bill.
The discretion afforded to the Administrator in selecting 'technical experts' or 'other entities' without defined criteria (Sections 3, 5, 6, and 7) may lead to accusations of favoritism or bias, affecting the ethical integrity of the bill's implementation.
The absence of specific metrics, performance indicators, or accountability measures in Sections 4, 5, 6, and 8 can lead to challenges in evaluating the success or failure of the AI applications and innovations, impacting their effectiveness and utility.
The potential duplication of efforts due to lack of mention of international collaboration in Section 3 could result in inefficiencies, especially when existing advanced models and datasets might be available, leading to financial and operational redundancy concerns.
The broad language and general terms like 'novel co-investment strategies' and 'high-risk, high-return research and development' in Section 8 lack specificity, which could result in ambiguous implementations and accountability challenges, raising both financial and legal concerns.
The environmental impact considerations in Sections 3, 6, and 7 are vague, lacking specific guidance or enforcement mechanisms, which might lead to ecological concerns and questions about environmental responsibility.
The ambiguity around terms like 'open license' and rights to intellectual property in Section 10 poses potential legal challenges and disputes regarding data and intellectual property management.
The timeline constraints in Sections 5 and 6 for developing frameworks and program implementations could result in rushed efforts, leading to incomplete or ineffective analyses and operational structures.
The potential favoritism towards certain private or academic entities due to inadequately defined partnership distribution and evaluation criteria in Sections 8 and 9 could undermine fairness and equitable opportunity principles.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the "Transformational Artificial Intelligence to Modernize the Economy against Extreme Weather Act", also known as the "TAME Extreme Weather Act". It includes a list of different sections within the Act, such as definitions, earth system forecasting, artificial intelligence applications for weather, technical assistance, fire modeling, emissions monitoring, innovation partnerships, workforce expertise, and data access.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for several terms used in the Act, including administrators, artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence weather models, curation, numerical weather models, observational data, open licenses, reforecast analysis, synthetic data, training datasets, the weather enterprise, and weather forecasting training datasets. These definitions help clarify the meaning of technical terms related to weather prediction and data analysis.
3. Earth system forecasting and information delivery Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Administrator, working with other agencies, to create comprehensive weather forecasting datasets and explore the use of artificial intelligence in weather models to improve forecasting and public preparedness. Additionally, the Administrator is to assess current datasets, minimize environmental impacts, support ongoing research, and report on progress to Congress.
4. Advanced artificial intelligence applications for weather and information delivery Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Administrator to investigate advanced uses of artificial intelligence to enhance weather forecasts and information delivery. This includes improving data analysis, using AI models to boost forecast reliability, and delivering better decision support to various communities.
5. Technical assistance on use of artificial intelligence weather models Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section addresses the need for the Administrator to regularly review artificial intelligence weather models and provide technical support, best practices, and testing opportunities for forecasters, social scientists, and emergency managers. It also calls for collaboration with various organizations to enhance model assessments through reforecast analysis, and it encourages an independent study on the impacts of AI models in weather forecasting.
6. Fire environment modeling program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan for creating a fire environment modeling program that uses artificial intelligence to predict, detect, and warn about wildfires. This involves gathering and integrating various data sources, including weather data, and developing a training dataset while minimizing environmental impacts.
7. Emissions monitoring and analysis program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes an initiative where, within one year of the law's passage, the Administrator will develop a program using artificial intelligence to analyze global atmospheric data. This program aims to enhance models for air transport and chemistry, predict greenhouse gas emissions, track emissions from natural disasters, identify changes in global pollutants, and refine data processing techniques, while taking measures to minimize environmental impact.
8. Partnerships for transformational innovation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Administrator to form partnerships with private and academic entities to advance innovations in weather and environmental forecasting. It also encourages co-investment strategies with these sectors, focusing on high-risk research and sharing of intellectual property and resources.
9. Federal Government workforce expertise Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes the responsibilities of the Administrator in building a professional and diverse team for weather forecasting using artificial intelligence. It emphasizes the need for collaboration between the government and private sector experts to offer training and development opportunities for workers, improving both skills and infrastructure.
10. Data access Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Administrator is allowed to share data or code created under this Act with the public for free, but must take steps to ensure that sharing does not compromise national security, intellectual property rights, trade secrets, commercial information, contracts, or the protective mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This Act also does not override other laws that protect national security interests.