Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against tax for charitable donations to nonprofit organizations providing workforce training.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9461 is a plan to let people get a special tax break if they give money to certain groups that help people learn job skills. It’s like saying, “Thank you for helping others learn to work,” and in return, the government asks them to pay a little less in taxes.

Summary AI

H.R. 9461 proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to offer a tax credit for individuals who donate to nonprofit organizations that provide workforce development and apprenticeship training programs. The bill outlines the conditions for receiving this tax credit, including limits on the amount that can be claimed and rules about how contributions are allocated. It specifies what qualifies as eligible donations and organizations, intending to encourage more donations towards programs that help people get workforce training. This proposal would take effect for taxable years ending after December 31, 2024.

Published

2024-09-06
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-09-06
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9461ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,447
Pages:
7
Sentences:
41

Language

Nouns: 434
Verbs: 88
Adjectives: 97
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 65
Entities: 93

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.27
Average Sentence Length:
35.29
Token Entropy:
4.97
Readability (ARI):
19.91

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "USA Workforce Investment Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It aims to introduce a tax credit for individuals who make charitable donations to nonprofit organizations that provide workforce development or apprenticeship training programs. The intent is to encourage greater financial contributions to organizations that offer valuable training services, thereby enhancing the workforce.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill introduces several new provisions, but there are notable concerns regarding its implementation and potential impact.

  1. Volume Cap Allocation: The bill sets a $5 billion per year cap from 2025 to 2028 for tax credits, allocated on a first-come, first-serve basis. This approach could benefit larger, well-informed entities capable of quick action while disadvantaging smaller and less resourced organizations.

  2. Lack of Specific Criteria: The bill provides a broad definition of what constitutes a "workforce development or apprenticeship training organization." However, it lacks detailed criteria for eligibility beyond inclusion in a list prepared under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, which may lead to oversight and accountability issues.

  3. Administrative Challenges: The requirement for real-time updates on contribution tracking could create significant administrative challenges and potentially increase costs for the responsible government agency.

  4. Complex Language: The complex legal terminology and structure might make it difficult for individuals and organizations to understand the eligibility criteria and application processes for the tax credit.

  5. State Distribution Disparities: Ten percent of the volume cap is allocated evenly among states, which might not reflect population differences, potentially leading to unequal benefits across states.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, this bill aims to stimulate investment in workforce development, potentially leading to a better-trained workforce. However, the effectiveness of this initiative largely depends on how seamlessly the provisions are implemented and accessed by potential contributors.

  • Positive Impacts:
  • Taxpayers and Donors: Individuals who donate to eligible organizations could benefit from a reduction in their tax liabilities, incentivizing more charitable contributions.
  • Workforce Development Organizations: Nonprofits that qualify under the bill could secure more funding to enhance and expand their programs.

  • Negative Impacts:

  • Smaller Organizations: Smaller or newer organizations may find it difficult to compete with established entities for the available tax credits, especially given the first-come, first-serve allocation system.
  • State-Level Disparities: Residents in more populous states might find less opportunity to benefit from the credits due to the equal distribution of the designated state cap, which does not necessarily consider state population size or needs.

In conclusion, while the bill has the potential to enhance workforce training efforts, it also presents challenges that need attention to ensure equitable access and effective resource use. The simple mechanism of tax incentives is complicated by logistical and structural elements that may require further refinement to optimize the intended benefits of the legislation.

Financial Assessment

The proposed bill, H.R. 9461, seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide a tax credit to individuals for making charitable donations to nonprofit organizations involved in workforce training programs. This endeavor introduces several financial mechanisms and allocations that are pivotal to understanding its impact.

Financial Allocations

At the heart of this bill is the introduction of a tax credit that individual taxpayers can claim. The credit amount is subject to specific limitations: it cannot exceed the lesser of 25 percent of certain tax liability sums or $150,000 per taxpayer for any given taxable year. To offer a structured approach, the bill also introduces a volume cap—a total limit on the amount of tax credit that can be distributed—set at $5,000,000,000 for each year from 2025 to 2028.

Allocation Concerns

There are several concerns that arise from how these financial allocations are structured. The volume cap being distributed on a first-come, first-serve basis might inadvertently favor those who have more immediate access and resources. This can potentially disadvantage smaller organizations or individuals who may not be as quick to act, thus creating inequality in access to these credits. Moreover, since 10 percent of the volume cap is allocated among states regardless of population variances, there is an inherent risk of inequitable distribution of credits at the state level.

Oversight and Efficacy

The bill mandates a system for the real-time tracking of contributions. While this aims to enhance transparency, it could introduce increased administrative costs and technical challenges due to the complexities involved in maintaining such a system. Furthermore, the provision for potential annual increases in the volume cap—specifically, a 5 percent increase following a high-use year—could lead to an expansion of the program without sufficient checks on its effectiveness or efficiency, raising concerns about resource utilization.

Complexity and Understanding

Lastly, the language and stipulations within the bill, particularly around the allocation and limitations of the tax credit, might pose challenges in comprehension. The complexity of the rules and definitions could create barriers for some taxpayers and organizations in understanding how to qualify for and claim these benefits effectively.

In summary, while the bill aims to encourage charitable contributions to workforce training programs through financial incentives, the way these financial references are designed raises issues of equity, complexity, and potential administrative burdens. Careful consideration and possible revisions may be needed to ensure that the bill achieves its intended purpose fairly and efficiently.

Issues

  • The allocation of the $5,000,000,000 volume cap on a first-come, first-serve basis might favor more informed or quicker taxpayers, potentially disadvantaging smaller or less resourced organizations and creating unequal opportunities (Sections 2 and 25F).

  • The lack of detailed criteria for 'workforce development or apprenticeship training organization' raises concerns about oversight and accountability, as the bill provides only a broad definition without specific guidelines that organizations must meet (Section 2).

  • The requirement for the Secretary to provide real-time updates on contributions could be technically challenging and resource-intensive, leading to increased administrative costs (Section 25F).

  • The provision for annual volume cap increases could lead to unchecked growth in the credit program without corresponding oversight on efficacy, which may result in inefficient use of resources (Section 25F).

  • The language and terminology used in the bill, particularly in the allocation and limits of the tax credit, are complex, potentially making it difficult for taxpayers or organizations to fully understand their eligibility or how to apply (Sections 2 and 25F).

  • Potential for unequal state distribution: The 10 percent allocation of the volume cap among states might not adequately account for population differences, leading to unequal opportunities among residents of different states (Section 25F).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section specifies the short title of the Act, which is officially named the “USA Workforce Investment Act”.

2. Tax credit for contributions of individuals to workforce development or apprenticeship training programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a tax credit for individuals who make contributions to workforce development or apprenticeship training programs. It specifies the credit amounts, limitations, and rules, including the allocation of a $5 billion annual cap from 2025 to 2028 for these credits, and provides definitions and conditions for qualified contributions and organizations.

Money References

  • “(b) Limitations.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—The credit allowed under subsection (a) to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed an amount equal to the lesser of— “(A) 25 percent of the sum of the amounts described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 26(a) for such taxable year, or “(B) $150,000. “(2) ALLOCATION OF VOLUME CAP.—The credit allowed under subsection (a) to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount of the volume cap allocated by the Secretary to such taxpayer under subsection (f) with respect to qualified contributions made by the taxpayer during the taxable year.
  • — “(1) IN GENERAL.—The volume cap applicable under this section shall be $5,000,000,000 for each of calendar years 2025 through 2028, and zero for calendar years thereafter.
  • — “(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the calendar year after a high use calendar year, the dollar amount otherwise in effect under subsection (a) for such calendar year shall be equal to 105 percent of the dollar amount in effect for such high use calendar year.
  • “(D) PUBLICATION OF ANNUAL VOLUME CAP.—The Secretary shall make publicly available the dollar amount of the volume cap in effect under subsection (a) for each calendar year.

25F. Contributions to workforce development and apprenticeship training programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides a tax credit for individuals who make donations to workforce development or apprenticeship training programs, with limitations based on factors like a percentage of certain costs, a $150,000 maximum, and allocated volume caps. It also specifies that the total annual volume cap is $5 billion from 2025 to 2028, managed on a first-come, first-serve basis, and includes details on how unused credits can be carried forward to future years.

Money References

  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—The credit allowed under subsection (a) to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed an amount equal to the lesser of— (A) 25 percent of the sum of the amounts described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 26(a) for such taxable year, or (B) $150,000. (2) ALLOCATION OF VOLUME CAP.—The credit allowed under subsection (a) to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount of the volume cap allocated by the Secretary to such taxpayer under subsection (f) with respect to qualified contributions made by the taxpayer during the taxable year.
  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—The volume cap applicable under this section shall be $5,000,000,000 for each of calendar years 2025 through 2028, and zero for calendar years thereafter.
  • — (A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the calendar year after a high use calendar year, the dollar amount otherwise in effect under subsection (a) for such calendar year shall be equal to 105 percent of the dollar amount in effect for such high use calendar year.
  • (D) PUBLICATION OF ANNUAL VOLUME CAP.—The Secretary shall make publicly available the dollar amount of the volume cap in effect under subsection (a) for each calendar year.