Overview

Title

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to prohibit increased payments under a group health plan or group health insurance coverage for telehealth services furnished by a provider located at a facility.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 9457 is a rule that says doctors shouldn't get paid extra for giving video call check-ups from a fancy place. If a doctor tries to charge too much, they might have to pay a fine, starting January 2026.

Summary AI

H. R. 9457 aims to change the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to stop higher payments for telehealth services provided by healthcare professionals at facilities. The bill states that payments should not be more than what would be given if the provider was not at a facility, and it bans separate facility fees for telehealth when a provider can bill independently. It also proposes penalties of up to $10,000 for facilities that violate this rule. Effective from January 1, 2026, the bill seeks to make telehealth services more cost-effective and transparent.

Published

2024-12-19
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-12-19
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9457rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
1,384
Pages:
8
Sentences:
19

Language

Nouns: 478
Verbs: 116
Adjectives: 57
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 77
Entities: 66

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.38
Average Sentence Length:
72.84
Token Entropy:
5.11
Readability (ARI):
39.29

AnalysisAI

The bill, titled the "Transparent Telehealth Bills Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Its primary objective is to control costs related to telehealth services delivered from healthcare facilities. The legislation aims to curb increased payments by health plans for telehealth services when provided by a healthcare provider located at a facility, as opposed to those delivered outside such settings. In addition, it includes measures to prohibit separate facility fees for telehealth services when a provider is already authorized to bill independently.

General Summary

The key aspects of the bill involve placing constraints on what health plans can compensate for telehealth services delivered from a physical facility. By capping payments to match those provided from non-facility locations, the legislation intends to prevent excess charges potentially passed on to consumers. There are reporting and implementation aspects included, such as a requirement for the Comptroller General to deliver a comprehensive report on telehealth trends within 18 months and a set effective date for these regulatory changes to take place by January 1, 2026.

Significant Issues

One significant issue with this bill is the possible unintended consequence of reducing access to telehealth services, as facilities might be disincentivized from providing such services under new payment restrictions. The language concerning billing practices, such as the definition of “facility fees,” might be ambiguous, leading to confusion that could affect healthcare providers. Smaller healthcare facilities, which may rely heavily on facility fees for operational revenue, might face financial challenges under these changes.

Moreover, the bill does impose enforcement through financial penalties but neglects other potential corrective or supportive measures to ensure compliance, potentially leading to adversarial relationships between oversight bodies and healthcare providers.

Impact on the Public

For the public, the intended benefit of this bill might be reduced healthcare costs related to the provision of telehealth services. By capping expenses attributed to these services, patients could potentially see lower insurance premiums or out-of-pocket expenses. However, there is also a risk that fewer healthcare facilities offering telehealth services might limit choice and access, particularly in areas lacking robust healthcare infrastructure or in under-served rural regions.

Impact on Stakeholders

Healthcare Facilities: This stakeholder group might face negative financial impacts due to the restriction on charging additional facility fees for telehealth services. Small facilities, in particular, could be disproportionately affected if their existing revenue models are disrupted without alternative provisions.

Healthcare Providers: Providers working at facilities could find themselves caught between regulatory compliance and maintaining revenue streams. The lack of clear definitions related to allowable charges could lead them to alter service delivery or face financial penalties.

Regulatory and Oversight Entities: These groups are tasked with ensuring compliance but might find the execution challenging due to the bill’s lack of specificity in terminology and guidelines. The reliance solely on financial penalties as an enforcement mechanism might not be an effective long-term approach.

Patients: Initially, patients may see no immediate change. However, the shifting landscape in telehealth service provision could affect their access to such services, potentially impacting the convenience or scope of available healthcare services.

The Transparent Telehealth Bills Act of 2024 aims at controlling costs in health insurance related to telehealth. It does promise some cost-containment advantages but comes with several procedural and implementation challenges that need careful balancing to ensure positive outcomes for all stakeholders involved.

Financial Assessment

The proposed bill, H.R. 9457, makes a notable financial reference by introducing the prohibition of certain payments and fees related to telehealth services. A primary financial stipulation is the cap on payments for telehealth services. The bill ensures that the total amount recognized as payment for such services may not exceed what would have been paid if the provider were not located at a facility. This aims to curb additional charges often associated with facility overheads in telehealth billing.

In addition, the bill directly addresses the imposition of facility fees. Section 3 mandates that healthcare facilities cannot charge separate facility fees when a healthcare provider is authorized to bill independently for telehealth services. This move is designed to alleviate the financial burden on patients who might otherwise face inflated telehealth service charges due to additional, facility-imposed costs.

The financial consequences of non-compliance are also outlined. If a healthcare provider or facility violates these new regulations, they may incur a civil monetary penalty. The penalty is capped at $10,000 per violation, which serves as a significant deterrent to discourage non-compliance. However, this enforcement strategy raises a few concerns expressed in identified issues, such as the lack of other corrective actions or support mechanisms to help facilities adhere to the new rules.

Another financial-relevant concern is the potential impact on smaller healthcare facilities. These facilities may rely heavily on facility fees to sustain their operations. By prohibiting these fees, the bill could inadvertently place a strain on smaller providers, possibly affecting their financial stability and operations.

The delayed implementation date, set for January 1, 2026, also plays into the financial aspects of the bill. While this provides time for providers and facilities to adjust to the new rules, it may result in a continuation of current practices, which could perpetuate existing financial concerns for patients and providers alike.

Finally, the bill requires a report on telehealth usage and its financial impact, due 18 months post-enactment. This report represents a future financial reference, aiming to provide insight into usage trends, payment practices, and the overall financial efficacy of telehealth services under the new regulatory framework. The delay in this report may, however, hinder timely adjustments to financial regulations and policies.

Issues

  • The prohibition on increased payments for telehealth services furnished by a provider located at a facility (Section 2 and Section 726) could potentially discourage healthcare providers from offering telehealth services from their facilities, limiting options for patients and impacting access to care, particularly in under-served or rural areas.

  • The language regarding 'facility fee or other amount' and 'total amount recognized' (Section 2 and Section 726) might be ambiguous, leading to potential confusion over billing practices and financial implications for healthcare providers.

  • Smaller health care facilities might be disproportionately impacted by the prohibition of facility fees for telehealth services (Section 3 and Section 901), as these fees may contribute significantly to their operational costs.

  • The delayed implementation date of January 1, 2026 (Section 2), leaves a significant gap during which current practices may continue unaddressed, potentially affecting patient access and provider behavior.

  • The enforcement mechanism for violations of billing requirements (Section 3) relies solely on monetary penalties, without considering other corrective actions or support for facilities to comply, which might not effectively address the root causes of non-compliance.

  • There is no provision for appealing decisions related to violations under Section 901, which could raise concerns about fairness and due process rights for health care providers and facilities.

  • The requirement for a report only after 18 months (Section 2) may delay the recognition of issues or necessary improvements regarding telehealth service regulations, potentially affecting policy response times.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act gives it the official short title, "Transparent Telehealth Bills Act of 2024."

2. Prohibiting increased payments under a group health plan or group health insurance coverage for telehealth services furnished by a provider located at a facility Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text amends a section of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to prevent group health plans from paying more for telehealth services provided by healthcare providers located at facilities compared to those located elsewhere. Additionally, it requires the Comptroller General to report on various trends related to telehealth usage and payment patterns within 18 months of the Act's enactment, with a focus on payment differences, access, and utilization across different regions and circumstances.

726. Prohibition on increased payments for telehealth services furnished by a provider located at a facility Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the bill prohibits health plans from paying more for telehealth services provided by health care providers at a facility compared to those provided outside a facility. It also clarifies that "telehealth service" refers to any service given remotely via telecommunications.

3. Prohibiting health care providers and facilities from imposing certain facility fees for telehealth Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill prohibits health care facilities from charging extra fees for telehealth services if the provider is already authorized to charge for the services themselves. If a facility or provider violates this rule, they can be fined up to $10,000.

Money References

  • (b) Enforcement.—Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1132) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(6), by striking “or (9)” and inserting “(9), or (13)”; and (2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(13) If a health care provider or facility is found by the Secretary to be in violation of section 901, the Secretary may assess a civil monetary penalty against such provider or facility in an amount not to exceed $10,000 per violation.”.

901. Limitation on telehealth facility fees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A health care facility is not allowed to charge an additional facility fee for telehealth services if the health care provider can independently charge for their professional services.