Overview

Title

To prohibit the operation on Department of Defense property of certain vehicles designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign entity of concern, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9454 is a bill that wants to stop certain cars, which can connect to the internet and might be made by countries America is worried about, from being used on military lands because they could be dangerous. The Secretary of Defense will make a list of these cars each year to keep everyone safe.

Summary AI

H.R. 9454, known as the "Protecting Military Bases from Connected Vehicles of Concern Act of 2024," aims to prevent certain connected vehicles from operating on Department of Defense property. These vehicles are designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by entities associated with foreign nations that pose a potential national security risk. The Secretary of Defense is tasked with creating and annually updating a list of prohibited vehicles that could threaten U.S. national security. The bill defines connected vehicles as those with internet connectivity capable of communication and updates, and identifies risks including sabotage, infrastructure vulnerability, and threats to national security.

Published

2024-09-03
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-09-03
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9454ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
709
Pages:
4
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 195
Verbs: 59
Adjectives: 54
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 20
Entities: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.40
Average Sentence Length:
88.62
Token Entropy:
4.81
Readability (ARI):
46.95

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, titled the “Protecting Military Bases from Connected Vehicles of Concern Act of 2024,” seeks to enhance national security by restricting the use of certain vehicles on Department of Defense (DoD) properties. Specifically, it targets vehicles that are deemed a security risk due to their connection with foreign entities of concern. The Secretary of Defense is tasked with maintaining and annually updating a list of such vehicles. The aim is to prevent any undue risk posed by these vehicles to national security.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several substantive issues arise from this bill:

  1. Administrative Burden and Costs: The bill requires an annual review and update of the list of prohibited vehicles by the Secretary of Defense. This could lead to increased administrative responsibilities and associated costs for the DoD.

  2. Dependence on External Definitions: The term 'foreign entity of concern' is defined based on another legal text, namely the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. If definitions in that document change or if the document becomes hard to access, it could create challenges in implementing this bill.

  3. Broad Definition of 'Connected Vehicle': The bill provides a broad definition of what constitutes a 'connected vehicle', including those that integrate various communication types. This expansive definition might complicate enforcement and compliance efforts, as it could cover a wide range of vehicles, impacting both personal and commercial owners.

  4. Vague Risk Assessment Criteria: The bill allows the Secretary of Defense significant discretion in labeling a vehicle as an 'undue or unacceptable risk'. This could result in subjective decision-making, potentially leading to political and legal concerns from affected stakeholders.

  5. Lack of Appeal Process: Entities affected by having their vehicles prohibited under this act do not have a specified avenue for appealing the decision. This could lead to questions of fairness and transparency.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill's impact on the public would relate mostly to those who own or operate connected vehicles. Owners of such vehicles manufactured under foreign entities of concern might find their vehicles prohibited on military properties. This could be significant for those needing frequent access to such properties for work or other legitimate purposes.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Military and National Security: The bill primarily aims to strengthen national security, particularly at military installations. By restricting potentially vulnerable technologies, it could mitigate risks associated with espionage or cyber threats.

Vehicle Manufacturers and Importers: Companies that design, develop, or supply vehicles connected to foreign entities of concern may face business challenges and reputational risks if their products are barred. The requirement to continuously justify and potentially contest the inclusion of their vehicles on the prohibited list might also be burdensome.

DoD Administration: Administratively, the DoD may experience increased workloads and operational pressures in adhering to the bill's requirements. Increased resources or personnel may be necessary to manage the listing process.

Legal and Regulatory Bodies: There could be legal implications stemming from disputes over vehicle prohibitions and stakeholder challenges. Legal resources might be required to interpret and implement these provisions effectively.

The bill, while focused on bolstering national security, will need to address these issues to ensure balanced implementation without imposing undue burdens on vehicle owners, manufacturers, and the DoD itself.

Issues

  • The requirement for the Secretary of Defense to review and update the list of prohibited connected vehicles annually could lead to increased administrative costs and overhead. This may have financial implications for the Department of Defense, and a less frequent review might be sufficient. (Section 2)

  • The term 'foreign entity of concern' relies on an external definition from another legal document (William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021), which could cause confusion or misinterpretation if that definition changes or is not easily accessible. This might lead to legal challenges or difficulties in implementation. (Section 2)

  • The broad definition of 'connected vehicle,' which includes various forms of communication and connectivity, could potentially encompass a wide range of vehicles, complicating enforcement and compliance efforts. This might have significant political and legal implications if personal and commercial vehicles are unduly affected. (Section 2)

  • The requirement to assess the 'undue or unacceptable risk' of connected vehicles could lead to ambiguity and subjective judgments by the Secretary of Defense. This might raise political and legal concerns, especially if stakeholders believe decisions are made arbitrarily. (Section 2)

  • The absence of a specified appeal or review process for entities affected by a vehicle being placed on the prohibited list may raise concerns about fairness and transparency in decision-making, leading to potential legal challenges. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section states the name of the Act, which is called the “Protecting Military Bases from Connected Vehicles of Concern Act of 2024”.

2. Prohibition on operation of connected vehicles designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign entity of concern on Department of Defense property Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the operation of certain connected vehicles, which are made by companies under the control or jurisdiction of foreign entities of concern, on Department of Defense properties. The Secretary of Defense is required to create and annually update a list of these prohibited vehicles, based on the risk they pose to national security.