Overview
Title
To award a Congressional Gold Medal to Peter McGuire in recognition of his contributions to the American Labor Movement.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9419 wants to give a special gold medal to Peter McGuire for helping workers get better rights, like shorter work hours. After they give him the medal, it's going to be put in a museum for everyone to see.
Summary AI
H.R. 9419 proposes to award a Congressional Gold Medal to Peter McGuire in recognition of his significant contributions to the American Labor Movement. McGuire is celebrated for his efforts in advancing labor rights, advocating for the 8-hour workday, and helping establish key labor organizations like the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and the American Federation of Labor. After the medal is awarded, it will be given to the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History for display and research purposes. The bill also allows for the creation and sale of bronze duplicates of the medal.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill "H. R. 9419" from the 118th Congress seeks to honor Peter McGuire by awarding him a Congressional Gold Medal. This recognition is for his significant contributions to the American Labor Movement. McGuire played a pivotal role in advocating for labor rights, especially those of carpenters and joiners, and was instrumental in pushing for the 8-hour workday. The award would be a symbolic acknowledgment of his efforts, with the medal being housed at the National Museum of American History for public display and research. Additionally, the bill allows for the production and sale of duplicate bronze medals to help fund the initiative.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several concerns that require careful scrutiny:
Financial Vagueness: The bill does not specify the cost involved in creating the gold medal or how these costs will be managed. Terms like "such amounts as may be necessary" are too open-ended and could lead to unaccounted spending.
Duplication and Cost Recovery: While the bill authorizes making and selling duplicate bronze medals, it lacks transparency in determining production limits, costs, and potential purchaser favoritism.
Oversight and Distribution: The bill does not outline clear guidelines for how many medals will be struck, who will distribute them, or how these items will be managed as national or numismatic artifacts.
Design and Consultation: There is ambiguity in the "appropriate design" for the medal and no clear resolution process for any disagreements between the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Labor regarding its design.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill represents an appreciation of historical figures who have shaped the labor rights environment. It celebrates an important part of American history and encourages awareness of labor movements that continue to influence workers' rights today. Public display of the medal serves educational purposes and helps foster national pride in historical achievements.
However, public trust may be affected if financial aspects of the bill are not managed transparently. Vague budget allocations could lead to skepticism about government spending and efficiency. Taxpayers may be concerned about unchecked costs and lack of oversight in the medal production process.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Labor Unions and Historians: The bill is a win for labor unions and historians as it highlights significant labor achievements and increases public understanding of labor rights history. It also provides an opportunity for labor organizations to renew interest and leverage historical accomplishments in present negotiations and advocacy.
The Government and Treasury: Government agencies involved, like the U.S. Mint and Department of Labor, face challenges in ensuring efficient spending and production processes. They need to demonstrate accountability and transparency to mitigate concerns about favoritism or mismanagement.
The Public and Educational Institutions: Educational institutions, museums, and members of the public stand to benefit from increased accessibility to artifacts of historic relevance. Displays can be leveraged for educational programs, encouraging scholarly research on labor history and further promoting public understanding of ongoing labor issues.
In conclusion, the bill's intent to award Peter McGuire is commendable, yet it necessitates concrete measures to prevent financial indiscretion and ensure that government accountability is maintained throughout its execution.
Issues
Section 6: The phrase 'such amounts as may be necessary' is vague and could lead to unchecked spending. It would be beneficial to specify a more precise figure or limit to ensure financial accountability.
Section 3: The bill does not specify the cost of designing and striking the gold medal, which could lead to uncontrolled spending without a predefined budget.
Section 4: The provision does not outline a cap or limitation on the number of duplicate medals that may be struck and sold, which might lead to excessive production beyond a reasonable need.
Section 5: There is no mention of how many medals are to be struck or the criteria for their distribution, leaving potential for oversight or lack of transparency.
Section 2: The section does not specify any specific spending or budget allocations, making it difficult to determine whether any spending related to the bill might be wasteful.
Section 6: The lack of detail on how the costs for the medals will be calculated or justified opens possibilities for inefficient use of funds.
Section 3: The term 'appropriate design' is subjective and could lead to ambiguity in what is considered suitable for the gold medal.
Section 3: The directive to the Secretary of the Treasury to consult with the Secretary of Labor lacks specificity on how disagreements or differences in opinion should be resolved, potentially leading to delays or conflicts.
Section 4: The use of the term 'at a price sufficient to cover the costs thereof' is ambiguous as it does not specify how the cost will be calculated or verified, which could lead to financial discrepancies.
Section 5: There is no information on who will be responsible for the distribution or sale of these numismatic items, which could lead to potential favoritism or lack of accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, stating that it may be referred to as the "Peter McGuire Congressional Gold Medal Act".
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Peter McGuire played a critical role in advancing the American labor movement through his leadership in the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and his advocacy for better working conditions, such as the 8-hour workday. His efforts helped establish significant labor unions and organize impactful strikes, bringing meaningful improvements to workers’ rights in the late 19th century.
3. Congressional gold medal Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes Congress to present a gold medal to Peter McGuire for his contributions to the American Labor Movement and outlines that the medal, after being awarded, will be displayed at the National Museum of American History and possibly other locations linked to the labor movement or the Gilded Age.
4. Duplicate medals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary is allowed to make and sell bronze copies of a special gold medal created under section 3. These bronze duplicates will be sold at a price that covers all related costs, such as labor and materials.
5. Status of medals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that medals created under this Act are considered national medals according to U.S. law. Additionally, these medals are regarded as collectible items, known as numismatic items, under specific sections of the U.S. Code.
6. Authority to use fund amounts; proceeds of sale Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it states that the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund can be used to cover the costs of making certain medals. Additionally, money from selling specific bronze medals will be added back into this Fund.