Overview
Title
To authorize a court to award restitution for unlawful entry and presence in the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to let judges make people pay money if they come into the country and stay without following the rules. It's called the "ALIEN Act."
Summary AI
H. R. 9387 is a bill proposed in the House of Representatives that seeks to give courts the authority to award restitution for unlawful entry and presence in the United States. This means that individuals who enter or remain in the country illegally could be ordered to pay compensation under this bill. The act is also known as the "Allocating Liability to Illegal Entrants in National Courts Act" or the "ALIEN Act." The bill was introduced on August 20, 2024, by Mr. Gaetz and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
H.R. 9387, introduced in the 118th Congress, is a legislative proposal that aims to address issues related to the unauthorized entry and presence of individuals in the United States. The bill, officially titled the "Allocating Liability to Illegal Entrants in National Courts Act," often referred to by its acronym "ALIEN Act," proposes a mechanism by which courts may award restitution in these cases.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill comprises two main sections. The first section designates its short title, while the second modifies specific references within U.S. legal code concerning restitution for unlawful entry. Specifically, it amends Title 18, Section 3663(a) of the United States Code. The amendment involves changes to how restitution orders are applied by inserting a reference to Section 275(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act—aligned with 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)—which addresses illegal entry.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the major concerns with this legislation is the language used in its title. The term "ALIEN Act" is controversial, as "alien" is considered by many to be a dehumanizing term for individuals. This choice of words may carry inherent bias and can influence public and political perception negatively, especially among communities that advocate for immigrant rights.
Moreover, the bill lacks clarity and details on implementation and enforcement. Without a clear outline of its objectives, it may lead to confusion and misinterpretation. The amendment within Section 2 references specific legal statutes without adequate explanation, making it challenging for those not familiar with these laws to fully understand the potential changes and their implications.
Broad Public Impact
The introduction of this bill may spark considerable public discourse regarding immigration and legality. It could contribute to heightened awareness, debate, and polarization on issues involving immigration law and its enforcement in national courts.
If passed, the bill may pave the way for a legal framework where courts regularly mandate restitution related to unlawful entry, which could impact judicial proceedings significantly. However, without clarity on what restitution entails and how it is determined, individuals affected by this law may face legal and financial uncertainties.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Immigrant Communities: The bill might escalate fear and anxiety among undocumented immigrants and their communities. The symbolic use of language and the potential legal consequences represented in the bill could foster a sense of being targeted or marginalized further.
Legal Practitioners and Courts: Lawyers and judges may encounter challenges interpreting and applying the changes due to a lack of clarity and context within the bill. This could complicate legal proceedings and result in varying applications of the law across different jurisdictions.
Policymakers and Advocates: For those engaged in immigration policy and advocacy, the bill represents both a challenge and an opportunity. It prompts a deeper conversation about the fairness and effectiveness of current immigration policies and offers a venue for articulating alternative approaches or reforms.
In summary, while H.R. 9387 seeks to address restitution for unlawful entry into the United States, its impact largely depends on the interpretation, enforcement, and public reception of its provisions. The lack of clarity and the choice of language in the bill could introduce complications that ultimately affect various stakeholders differently.
Issues
The title 'Allocating Liability to Illegal Entrants in National Courts Act' and its acronym 'ALIEN Act' in Section 1 may carry bias and could be perceived as prejudicial. The term 'alien' is often seen as dehumanizing, which raises ethical and political concerns about the framing of individuals affected by this bill.
Section 1 is ambiguous regarding the Act's purpose, implementation, and scope, which might make it challenging for lawmakers, legal practitioners, and the general public to understand its full implications and objectives. This lack of clarity can lead to misinterpretation and controversy.
The amendment in Section 2 lacks explanation of its purpose, making it difficult to understand the intended goals and implications without additional context. This could create legal confusion and hinder effective application and interpretation by the courts.
The amendment in Section 2 refers to specific legal texts (e.g., 'section 275(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1325(a))') without providing detailed context or information on changes, making it challenging for those not intimately familiar with these sections to grasp the legal impact, thus raising legal and political concerns.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the proposed Act states its official short title: it can be referred to as either the “Allocating Liability to Illegal Entrants in National Courts Act” or the “ALIEN Act”.
2. Order of restitution for unlawful entry and presence in the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the U.S. Code by removing a reference to section 5124 and adding a reference to section 275(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This change is related to the rules for restitution in cases of unlawful entry into the United States.