Overview

Title

To amend title 37, United States Code, to strengthen and expand restrictions on retired members and members of reserve components of the uniformed services accepting employment and compensation from foreign governments, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9364 wants to make sure that people who used to be in the military can't get jobs or money from other countries without checking if it's safe, and they might have to wait a bit before doing so. It also means there will be a list that everyone can see, showing these jobs, but it must still protect people's private stuff.

Summary AI

H.R. 9364, also known as the "Retired Officers Conflict of Interest Act of 2024," proposes changes to title 37 of the United States Code to enhance rules against retired and reserve military members taking jobs or payments from foreign governments. It introduces an approval process for such employment and sets limitations like a 30-month restriction on retirees with access to classified information. The bill also requires transparency in employment reporting, creates penalties for violations, and mandates a public database of approved employment, ensuring these engagements do not harm U.S. national security. Additionally, the Comptroller General is tasked with reviewing these employment practices two years after the Act's enactment.

Published

2024-08-16
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-16
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9364ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
13
Words:
3,620
Pages:
17
Sentences:
59

Language

Nouns: 1,042
Verbs: 244
Adjectives: 174
Adverbs: 26
Numbers: 164
Entities: 202

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.01
Average Sentence Length:
61.36
Token Entropy:
5.07
Readability (ARI):
31.40

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the Retired Officers Conflict of Interest Act of 2024, seeks to amend existing laws concerning the employment of retired military personnel and members of reserve forces with foreign governments. This includes stronger restrictions and expanded regulatory frameworks to manage potential conflicts of interest. Key provisions include a stricter approval process for such employment, a 30-month waiting period for retired members with classified information access before seeking foreign employment, mandatory post-retirement employment reporting, and the establishment of a public database of employment approvals. The bill also introduces civil penalties for non-compliance and mandates public reporting of foreign government-related employment.

Significant Issues

Several issues have been identified within the bill's framework:

  1. Arbitrary Waiting Period: The 30-month prohibition period for retired military personnel with classified information access appears arbitrary, with no clear justification for this specific duration.

  2. Favored Nations: The bill singles out certain allied countries (United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) for exceptions in employment prohibitions, potentially raising concerns about favoritism without clear criteria.

  3. Lack of Enforcement Mechanisms: The bill lacks specific penalties or enforcement strategies for violations, particularly concerning negotiations by active-duty personnel with foreign governments, which may impact its efficacy.

  4. Ambiguous Terminology: Terms such as "material change" in employment reporting are vague, potentially leading to compliance challenges.

  5. Privacy and Data Concerns: The creation of a public employment approval database, although promoting transparency, raises privacy concerns and lacks detailed guidelines on data handling and retention.

  6. Bureaucratic Oversight: The requirement for approval from multiple secretaries could lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies, potentially affecting the speed and fairness of employment processes for affected individuals.

Public Impact

If enacted, this bill may significantly affect how retired military personnel engage in post-service employment, especially concerning international opportunities. The expanded restrictions aim to protect national security interests but may also delay or restrict legitimate career advancements for former service members. The imposition of civil penalties and the potential public disclosure of employment details could further discourage improper relationships with foreign governments.

Impact on Stakeholders

Retired Military Personnel: This group could face increased challenges and delays in securing employment after service, particularly with foreign entities. While the intention is to prevent conflicts of interest, the restrictive measures and potential bureaucratic hurdles might inhibit their post-retirement career prospects.

Foreign Governments and Entities: The bill may affect how foreign governments engage with retired U.S. military officials, influencing international relations and cooperation. The notable exceptions for specific allied countries could lead to preferential treatment, impacting diplomatic dynamics.

U.S. Government and Agencies: Increased oversight responsibilities could strain resources within the Departments of Defense and State. Moreover, managing a public employment approval database could introduce transparency but also demands careful execution to prevent privacy breaches.

General Public: The public might experience increased confidence in national security due to tighter control over military retirees' engagements with foreign governments. However, they may also scrutinize the possible inefficiencies or perceived exceptions granted to certain countries.

Overall, the bill underscores the delicate balance between ensuring national security and allowing retired military personnel to pursue career opportunities without undue restrictions. Its effectiveness will largely depend on the clarity of its provisions and the robustness of its enforcement mechanisms.

Financial Assessment

The Retired Officers Conflict of Interest Act of 2024 introduces several financial aspects related to the restrictions and reporting on employment of retired and reserve members of the armed forces by foreign governments. Here's a breakdown of how these financial references are integrated into the bill and their potential implications:

Penalties and Financial Liabilities

A significant portion of the bill addresses penalties for non-compliance. Specifically, a person found violating the bill's provisions could be liable for a civil penalty amounting to the greater of $100,000 or the amount of compensation they received or were offered that constitutes a violation. This financial penalty is intended to act as a deterrent for retired or reserve military personnel who might seek unauthorized employment or compensation from foreign governments. However, the imposition of such penalties also raises issues regarding fairness and enforcement. The bill does not provide detailed penalties or clear enforcement mechanisms, especially concerning members of the Armed Forces negotiating employment with foreign governments while actively serving, which could impact the effectiveness of its financial deterrents.

Public Database and Transparency

The Act mandates the creation of a public database for employment approvals, aimed at increasing transparency. However, setting up and maintaining such an online portal could involve substantial costs. These expenses might be related to software development, cybersecurity measures, and data management. No specific budget or funding source is outlined for this purpose in the bill, which could lead to inefficiencies or potential wasteful spending if not adequately planned or funded.

Concerns About Data and Privacy

The public reporting sections of the bill stipulate unredacted publication of reports, which include financial details such as compensation related to foreign employment. While the intent is transparency, there are concerns about privacy and the protection of sensitive information. This requirement could expose personal financial data, and the bill does not elucidate how errors in data handling will be managed, potentially resulting in financial liabilities.

Economic Implications of Approval Processes

The bill involves multiple Secretaries in the approval process for foreign employment of retired military personnel. While this adds a layer of oversight, there might be economic repercussions. The increased bureaucratic processes could lead to inefficiencies and may affect the timely approval of employment opportunities, potentially causing financial distress to those waiting for approval to pursue new job opportunities.

Absence of a Detailed Funding Plan

Overall, while the bill establishes significant financial penalties and aims to create infrastructure for better transparency, it lacks detailed financial strategy for implementation. This includes managing costs associated with employee approvals, establishing a robust online database, and ensuring the protection and appropriate use of reported financial data. Without a clear funding plan, the administrative burden and financial implications of these provisions could be challenging to manage effectively.

In conclusion, while the financial elements of the Act are designed to enforce compliance and enhance transparency, there are potential gaps related to the allocation of resources and handling of personal data that could lead to financial inefficiencies or challenges in its application.

Issues

  • The prohibition period of 30 months on retired members of the Armed Forces seeking employment with foreign governments appears arbitrary and lacks justification for the specific duration, raising ethical and political questions about fairness and necessity (Section 4).

  • The bill's exception for accepting employment from allied governments such as the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand raises questions about why these countries are singled out without further reasoning or criteria, potentially leading to allegations of favoritism or inconsistent application (Section 4).

  • The bill lacks specific enforcement mechanisms or penalties for violations of key prohibitions, such as against members of the Armed Forces negotiating employment with foreign governments while on active duty, which could undermine the effectiveness of the legislation (Section 3).

  • The language concerning 'material change' in employment and related reporting requirements is somewhat ambiguous and may require further clarification to ensure compliance and avoid legal or ethical ambiguity (Section 2).

  • The creation of a public database and the lack of clear guidelines for data retention and handling errors could raise privacy concerns and exposure of sensitive or personal information (Section 10).

  • The new requirements involving multiple secretaries for employment approval might lead to increased bureaucratic oversight and inefficiencies, potentially affecting the timeliness and fairness of employment opportunities for retired or reservist military members (Section 2).

  • There is a substantial potential financial cost related to the establishment and maintenance of an online employment approval database without a detailed funding plan, posing risks of inefficiencies or wasteful spending (Section 10).

  • The process for appealing penalties to the President lacks detailed criteria or guidelines, which could lead to perceptions of bias, lack of transparency, and concentration of too much power without checks in the appeal process (Section 7).

  • The section on 'public reporting' does not provide sufficient protection for sensitive information, particularly as it requires unredacted reports to be made publicly accessible, which could have privacy or security implications (Section 9).

  • Specific terms and procedures, such as 'employment described in subsection (a)', are not clearly defined, leading to potential inconsistencies in interpretation and enforcement (Sections 6 and 11).

  • The bill does not specify the penalties for failing to comply with certain reporting requirements, which could lead to lack of enforcement or accountability regarding post-retirement employment reporting (Section 6).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Retired Officers Conflict of Interest Act of 2024 is designed to manage potential conflicts of interest involving retired military officers. It includes rules about job approval processes, prevents active-duty service members from negotiating foreign employment, sets a 30-month waiting period for classified individuals seeking jobs with foreign governments, outlines reporting duties, and provides guidance on related penalties and public disclosures.

2. Approval process for employment and compensation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendments to Section 908 of title 37 in the United States Code outline the process for approving employment and compensation of certain individuals, particularly when employment involves foreign governments through private entities. These changes introduce stricter review procedures involving the Secretary concerned and the Secretary of State to ensure national security is not compromised, and they specify the conditions under which approved employment or compensation arrangements may be revoked.

3. Prohibition on members of the Armed Forces negotiating employment with foreign governments while on active duty Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits active duty members of the Armed Forces from negotiating or having agreements for future jobs or compensation with foreign governments. This rule was added to the existing law in section 908 of title 37, United States Code.

4. 30-month prohibition on retired members of the Armed Forces eligible for access to classified information seeking approval for employment by foreign governments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A retired member of the armed forces who is eligible for access to classified information is not allowed to seek certain types of foreign employment for 30 months after retiring, except if they want to work for the governments of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, and get approval from the relevant U.S. authorities.

5. Notification of obligations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The new amendment to Section 908 of title 37, United States Code, requires the Secretary to make sure that each person mentioned in subsection (a) is informed about their obligations and confirms that they understand them.

6. Post-retirement employment reporting Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

During the 5 years after retirement, retired members of the armed forces must report any new jobs they take to their military branch. This reporting needs to happen both when they start a new job and at least once every year after that. Regulations will be made to ensure service members agree to these reporting requirements before they retire.

7. Penalties Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section outlines civil penalties for individuals who break specific rules in United States Code Title 37. If someone violates the rules, they may have to pay up to $100,000 or the amount they received for their violation, whichever is greater. Additionally, they could face employment restrictions with the U.S. or foreign governments, lose eligibility for classified information, and have limited options to appeal the penalties.

Money References

  • — “(1) IN GENERAL.—A person who violates subsection (b), (c), (e), (f), or (h) shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty in an amount that is not more than the greater of— “(A) $100,000; or “(B) the amount of compensation that the person received or was offered for the conduct in violation of subsection (b), (c), (e), or (f), or the employment described in subsection (h), as the case may be.

8. Guidance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to create and publicly share guidance on how to comply with a specific legal requirement within 120 days after the Retired Officers Conflict of Interest Act of 2024 is enacted.

9. Public reporting Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to section 908 of title 37, United States Code, requires any report about foreign government-provided travel, meals, lodging, or fees to be posted online by the Secretary of Defense within 60 days of its submission, ensuring public access to the full content of the report without redactions.

10. Database of employment approvals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the creation of a public online portal, established by the Secretary of Defense, to provide free access to information about employment approvals for certain individuals, focusing on roles related to the armed forces and foreign governments. It specifies what information can be searched, what is restricted from disclosure, the portal’s design for data download, and mandates updates and a 10-year retention of information.

11. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates United States Code title 37, section 908, by adding definitions for terms related to classified information: "classified information" requires protection for national security reasons; "eligible for access to classified information" refers to criteria set by the National Security Act of 1947; and "foreign government" has the meaning given in title 5.

12. Comptroller General of the United States review Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Comptroller General of the United States is required to submit a report within two years about former Armed Forces officers working for foreign governments, focusing on how the Departments of Defense and State manage and approve these employment situations. The report will assess existing laws and regulations related to this issue, including access to necessary contractor information.

13. Effective date; applicability Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments made by this Act become effective on the date the Act is enacted. They apply to job offers, negotiations, payments, and agreements related to specific employment and compensation situations, starting 120 days after the Act is enacted.