Overview

Title

To transfer the investigative jurisdiction over payment and financial systems from the United States Secret Service to the Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9358 wants to let the Department of the Treasury take over some important detective work about money from the Secret Service, so the Secret Service can focus more on protecting important people.

Summary AI

H.R. 9358, known as the "Focus on Protection Act," proposes transferring the responsibility for investigating payment and financial systems from the United States Secret Service to the Department of the Treasury. The bill lists reasons for this change, such as improving the efficiency of financial crime investigations and allowing the Secret Service to concentrate on protecting national leaders and foreign dignitaries. It details the transfer of personnel, resources, and related obligations to ensure a smooth transition and uninterrupted operations. Additionally, it reallocates relevant budgetary funds to the Department of the Treasury and sets the law to take effect 180 days post-enactment.

Published

2024-08-13
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-13
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9358ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
814
Pages:
5
Sentences:
30

Language

Nouns: 251
Verbs: 66
Adjectives: 31
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 33
Entities: 55

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.47
Average Sentence Length:
27.13
Token Entropy:
4.67
Readability (ARI):
16.56

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Focus on Protection Act," seeks to reassign investigative authority over payment and financial systems from the United States Secret Service to the Department of the Treasury. This transfer aims to streamline the investigation of financial crimes such as counterfeiting and cybercrimes affecting financial systems. The bill places trust in the Treasury's expertise and resources, suggesting this will lead to greater efficiency and allow the Secret Service to focus more on its protective duties.

Significant Issues

One primary concern with the bill is the lack of specific evidence or data substantiating the claim that transferring these responsibilities will enhance efficiency. Stakeholders may find it challenging to assess the true impact without more detailed support. Additionally, the bill does not specify whether the Treasury will receive adequate resources to take on these new duties, raising questions about its preparedness to manage them effectively.

Another significant issue is the degree of discretion given to the Secretary of the Treasury to decide which functions are transferred, potentially allowing for subjective interpretations and decisions. This could result in inefficiencies or inconsistencies during the transition. Furthermore, there is no explicit timeline for the transfer, which might lead to operational disruptions or gaps in accountability.

Public Impact

For the general public, the bill's intention to improve the efficiency of financial crime investigations could potentially lead to better protection against fraud and cybercrimes. However, without clear evidence supporting the effectiveness of this transfer, there may be skepticism about whether these benefits will be realized.

If the transition is poorly managed due to lack of clear guidelines or oversight, the public could experience delays or disruptions in investigations, potentially impeding efforts to combat financial crimes effectively.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The United States Secret Service could benefit from the reallocation of resources, allowing it to concentrate more on its protective directive, which could enhance national security. However, the organization might face an adjustment period where traditional roles are shifted, and responsibilities redefined.

Conversely, the Department of the Treasury might experience an increase in workload without necessarily receiving additional resources or personnel, depending on how the transition is managed. This risk could lead to inefficiencies or overextension, affecting its ability to conduct thorough investigations until sustainable systems are in place.

In summary, while the Focus on Protection Act presents potential benefits for streamlining financial crime investigations, there are notable concerns around resource allocation, transition management, and lack of supportive data. Addressing these issues will be crucial to ensure the proposed changes are effective and beneficial for all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • The bill does not provide specific evidence or data to support the claim in Section 2 that transferring the investigative mission to the Department of the Treasury will enhance efficiency and focus, which could make it difficult for stakeholders to assess the potential benefits and risks of this transfer.

  • Section 3 does not provide a clear explanation of whether adequate resources will be allocated to the Department of the Treasury for taking over the transferred functions, which is critical for ensuring that the Department can effectively handle its new responsibilities.

  • The language in Section 5 leaves the determination of which functions are transferred up to the Secretary of the Treasury without clear guidelines, which could result in subjective decision-making and lack of accountability.

  • Section 6 does not specify the exact amount of funds being reallocated to the Department of the Treasury, leading to potential transparency issues and concerns about whether the reallocation is sufficient or excessive.

  • There is no mention in Section 5 of an oversight mechanism or accountability measures to monitor the transition process, which could result in inefficiencies or mismanagement during the transfer of functions.

  • Overall, the bill lacks a detailed timeline for the transfer of functions outlined in multiple sections, which could lead to gaps in responsibility and operational disruptions.

  • The amendment in Section 4 to repeal subsection (b) of Title 18, Section 3056 without context makes it unclear what the full implications of this legislative change might be for the United States Secret Service or the Department of the Treasury.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that the official title of the legislation is the “Focus on Protection Act”.

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress found that moving the task of investigating payment and financial system issues to the Department of the Treasury would improve efficiency and focus in fighting financial crimes. This change would also allow the Secret Service to concentrate more on its main job of protecting national leaders and other important figures.

3. Transfer of functions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The functions previously handled by the United States Secret Service concerning investigations into payment and financial systems, such as counterfeit money, financial fraud, and cybercrimes affecting financial systems, are transferred to the Department of the Treasury.

4. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section makes two main changes to United States law: it removes a part of the law related to Section 3056 of Title 18, and it updates Section 321(a) of Title 31 by adjusting punctuation in some paragraphs and adding a new point that allows for the investigation of payment and financial systems.

5. Transition provisions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the transfer of Secret Service personnel and resources to the Department of the Treasury, ensuring that their roles continue smoothly during this change. It gives the Treasury Secretary the responsibility to decide which investigation functions and related assets and personnel are moved.

6. Budget reallocation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Funds that were originally given to the United States Secret Service for tasks that are now being moved due to this law will instead be redirected to the Department of the Treasury.

7. Effective date Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The law will start being enforced 180 days after it is formally passed.