Overview
Title
To prohibit any electric vehicle mandate, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9343 is a bill that says people and companies in the U.S. shouldn't be forced to use only electric cars. It also says that states that try to make people use electric cars could get in trouble with the government.
Summary AI
H.R. 9343, known as the “Federal Electric Vehicle Mandate Prohibition Act,” aims to prevent the requirement of electric vehicle (EV) use across the United States by banning any mandates that would force consumers or manufacturers to prioritize EVs over gas or hybrid vehicles. The bill argues that such mandates disrupt consumer choice and market dynamics while increasing costs. It also proposes that if a state or local government imposes a requirement for EV production or sales, they could face financial penalties. An annual review by the Comptroller General is required to ensure compliance with these rules.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Federal Electric Vehicle Mandate Prohibition Act" (H.R. 9343), seeks to prohibit federal, state, and local governments from enforcing any mandates that require the production, sale, or purchase of electric vehicles (EVs). The bill emphasizes the importance of consumer choice in the automotive market and argues that mandates related to electric vehicles could impose undue burdens on consumers and manufacturers, disrupt market dynamics, and increase costs. This legislation also proposes penalties for states that violate these prohibitions, including withholding a percentage of federal transportation funds.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several notable issues. One major concern is the potential conflict between the bill's prohibition on supporting electric vehicles and broader environmental objectives aimed at promoting sustainable transportation. By restricting the ability of governments to enforce EV mandates, the bill could hinder efforts to reduce carbon emissions and achieve climate goals.
Furthermore, the proposed penalty of withholding 10% of transportation funding could have significant implications for public infrastructure projects. This sanction poses the risk of adversely affecting states that rely on these funds for developing and maintaining transportation systems.
Moreover, the bill’s use of the term "mode of propulsion" is somewhat ambiguous and could lead to legal challenges or confusion regarding which specific actions are prohibited. Additionally, the annual review requirement by the Comptroller General might introduce unnecessary administrative burdens without providing a clear path for assessing and ensuring compliance.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could limit the progression toward electrified transportation by making it more challenging for governments to enforce policies supporting electric vehicles. This may slow down advancements in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality, which risks undermining public health and environmental benefits associated with increased EV adoption.
From a consumer perspective, the bill emphasizes the importance of choice, potentially ensuring that a variety of vehicle types remain available in the market. However, it could also slow technological innovations and limit future options for consumers interested in sustainable transportation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For environmental advocates and policymakers aiming to accelerate the transition to cleaner vehicle technologies, this bill represents a potential barrier. By restricting mandates on electric vehicles, it may counteract initiatives aimed at addressing climate change and promoting renewable energy use.
Conversely, stakeholders in the automotive industry—particularly those focused on traditional gasoline or hybrid vehicles—might view the bill as a supportive measure that preserves market balance and prevents forced transitions toward electric vehicles.
State governments with existing progressive policies favoring electric vehicle adoption could face challenges. The financial penalties proposed by the bill could result in reduced funding for transportation projects, impeding their capacity to maintain and improve infrastructure and services.
Overall, while the bill advocates for market freedom and consumer choice, its potential implications for environmental policy and state autonomy deserve careful consideration. The balance between promoting innovation in automotive technology and preserving traditional market dynamics remains a central tension in this legislative proposal.
Issues
The prohibition on supporting electric vehicles in Section 3 might conflict with broader environmental and sustainability goals, potentially hindering efforts to promote greener transportation methods.
In Section 3, the withholding of 10 percent of State apportionments under section 104(b) could adversely affect public infrastructure funding, leading to detrimental outcomes for state projects and services dependent on these funds.
Section 3's language could disproportionately impact states with progressive policies on electric vehicles, potentially leading to tensions between federal and state governments over environmental policies.
The term 'mode of propulsion' in Section 3 is vague, which could lead to legal ambiguities or challenges in enforcing the legislation, as it is unclear what qualifies as a prohibited action.
The findings in Section 2 assert that EV mandates impose undue burdens and disrupt market dynamics but lack detailed evidence and data to substantiate these claims, raising questions about the basis for legislative action.
Section 3 introduces an annual review requirement by the Comptroller General, which could increase administrative burdens without a clear plan for effective compliance assessment and correction.
The short title in Section 1, 'Federal Electric Vehicle Mandate Prohibition Act', could cause confusion as it does not outline the scope or implications of the bill's prohibitions beyond the title.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states its short title, which is the “Federal Electric Vehicle Mandate Prohibition Act”.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Congress highlights concerns that federal requirements for electric vehicles might limit consumer choices, place excessive demands on consumers and car makers, interfere with market operation, and increase costs for consumers and businesses without good reason.
3. Prohibition on restricting sale of vehicles based on mode of propulsion Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits governments at all levels from banning the sale of gas and hybrid cars based on how they're powered. It outlines penalties for states that disobey, requiring the reduction of federal transportation funds by 10%, and mandates annual reviews by the Comptroller General to check for compliance.