Overview

Title

To appropriate more funds for the Federal Communication Commission’s rip and replace program, to require a spectrum auction, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to give more money to the people who make sure our phones and computers talk safely to each other, and it plans to hold a big auction to sell rights for using invisible airwaves that help us talk on our devices.

Summary AI

The bill H.R. 9340, titled the “Supporting National Security with Spectrum Act,” aims to increase funding for the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) “rip and replace” program from $1.9 billion to $4.98 billion, and it allocates an additional $3.08 billion for this program for the fiscal year 2024. It also mandates the FCC to conduct a spectrum auction within one year to reauction certain licenses, as part of efforts to manage radio frequency spectrum more effectively. The bill addresses updating the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 to ensure national security and efficient communication infrastructure.

Published

2024-08-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-09
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9340ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
452
Pages:
3
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 136
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 32
Entities: 42

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.41
Average Sentence Length:
34.77
Token Entropy:
4.65
Readability (ARI):
20.15

AnalysisAI

Editorial Commentary

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Supporting National Security with Spectrum Act" aims to address several key areas concerning telecommunications infrastructure and spectrum management in the United States. Foremost, it seeks to increase funding for the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) “rip and replace” program, a directive focused on replacing untrusted communications equipment with secure alternatives. In addition, the bill mandates a reauction of specific radio frequency licenses, known as the "AWS-3 bands," to enhance national spectrum resources.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill presents a substantial increase in funding for the "rip and replace" program from $1.9 billion to nearly $5 billion. This dramatic rise raises questions regarding the justification and effectiveness of utilizing such funds without explicit detail on their intended allocation. Another notable issue involves the $3.08 billion appropriation allocated to the FCC without comprehensive oversight measures, which could lead to potential mismanagement or wasteful utilization of these funds. Additionally, the reauctioning requirements for the AWS-3 bands lack clarity regarding how the FCC intends to manage the spectrum inventory and utilize the sale proceeds, raising transparency concerns.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The proposed legislation has the potential to significantly impact the public, especially regarding national security and telecommunications reliability. Enhanced funding for the "rip and replace" program could lead to improved network security nationwide, reducing potential vulnerabilities. The spectrum auction provision could influence telecommunications costs and services by possibly increasing available bandwidth, which might improve mobile communication efficiency and coverage.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For telecommunications companies, an increase in FCC funding presents both opportunities and challenges. Companies undergoing network upgrades could benefit from the additional funding, enabling them to replace insecure components without financial strain. However, an aggressive auction process could necessitate extra investments to bid for valuable spectrum, impacting smaller providers adversely. Meanwhile, government agencies responsible for overseeing telecommunications standards might encounter pressure to enforce new regulations rigorously, ensuring that the increased funds lead to meaningful infrastructure improvements. Consumers, albeit indirectly, stand to benefit from potential network upgrades and improved security, although cost implications might vary depending on how effectively funds are managed and used.

In conclusion, while the bill intends to bolster national security and telecommunications capabilities, it requires careful consideration of funding allocations and oversight mechanisms to maximize public benefit and mitigate potential risks or inequities among stakeholders.

Financial Assessment

The bill H.R. 9340, titled the “Supporting National Security with Spectrum Act,” makes significant financial allocations, which are critical to understand in assessing its potential impacts and addressing concerns about financial management and transparency.

Financial Allocations and Increases

Firstly, the bill proposes an increase in funding for the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) “rip and replace” program. The original funding of $1.9 billion set by the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 is amended to a much larger $4.98 billion. This increase in funding reflects a substantial commitment to the "rip and replace" initiative, which involves removing specific types of communications equipment that may pose security risks and replacing them with secure alternatives. However, the justification and necessity for this large increase in funding are not explicitly outlined in the bill, leading to concerns about financial oversight and the potential for mismanagement or wasteful spending.

In addition, the bill allocates an extra $3.08 billion to the FCC for the fiscal year 2024. These funds are specified to remain available until expended, which raises important questions regarding how these funds will be managed and accounted for over time. The lack of detailed oversight measures and allocation breakdown further compounds the risk of inefficient use of taxpayer dollars without adequate accountability.

Lack of Specificity

The financial directives in the bill also present ambiguities due to the lack of specificity in the language used. The term "rip and replace," which is a key component of the proposed financial increase, is not explicitly defined. This ambiguity can result in misunderstandings about the precise nature of the projects or activities this funding is intended to support. Such vagueness might lead to confusion among stakeholders and the general public, amplifying concerns about potential misuse of funds.

Moreover, the bill does not clarify how the revenues generated from the speculated spectrum auction, guided by Section 4, will be utilized or managed. The absence of explicit instructions on the post-auction management of the spectrum and the financial outcomes could lead to potential issues in transparency and the effective management of public resources. This aspect raises concerns about whether the proceeds from this auction will be reinvested wisely or will support the broader mission of the FCC effectively.

Accessibility and Accountability

Finally, while technical terms such as “AWS–3 bands” are pertinent to the realm of communications, their use without further explanation limits the accessibility of this information to non-experts. Ensuring that these technical definitions are comprehensible to the general public would enhance transparency and understanding.

In summary, while the financial allocations in H.R. 9340 aim to support national security through enhanced communication infrastructure, the lack of specificity and oversight measures raises significant concerns about financial management and transparency. These issues need to be addressed to ensure that the considerable sums of money allocated are utilized effectively and responsibly.

Issues

  • The amendment in Section 2 significantly increases funding for the 'rip and replace' program from $1,900,000,000 to $4,980,000,000. This substantial increase raises questions about the justification and necessity of the additional funds, especially without explicit details on their intended use, creating a risk of mismanagement or wasteful spending.

  • Section 3 appropriates $3,080,000,000 to the Federal Communications Commission without detailed allocation or oversight measures. This could lead to potential mismanagement, lack of accountability, or wasteful spending, particularly in a large-scale federal budget.

  • The phrase 'rip and replace' in Section 2 is not clearly defined within the text of the bill, leading to ambiguity about the specific actions or projects this funding aims to support, which could confuse the general public and stakeholders.

  • Section 4 does not provide clarity on how the inventory of the Commission will be managed post-auction or how funds generated from the auction will be utilized. This lack of detail could lead to concerns about transparency and effective management of public resources.

  • Terms like 'AWS–3 bands' in Section 4 are technical and may not be clear to all readers without additional explanation, limiting the accessibility of this information to the general public and non-experts.

  • There is no mention of criteria or measures in Section 4 to assess the fairness of the FCC Auction 97 bidding process, which could raise concerns about potential favoritism or unfair competition.

  • The bill references the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 multiple times without providing sufficient context, making it difficult for individuals unfamiliar with the previous act to understand the full implications of the proposed changes.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official short title is the “Supporting National Security with Spectrum Act.”

2. Additional rip and replace funding Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 is updated by increasing the funding for the “rip and replace” program from $1.9 billion to $4.98 billion.

Money References

  • Section 4(k) of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1603(k)) is amended by striking “$1,900,000,000” and inserting “$4,980,000,000”.

3. Appropriation of funds Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the allocation of $3,080,000,000 to the Federal Communications Commission for the fiscal year 2024. These funds are designated for purposes under section 4 of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 and will remain available until fully used.

Money References

  • There is appropriated to the Federal Communications Commission for fiscal year 2024, out of amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $3,080,000,000, to remain available until expended, to carry out section 4 of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1603).

4. FCC Auction 97 reauction of certain licenses; completion of reauction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is required to hold a new auction within one year to sell licenses for certain radio frequencies known as the "AWS-3 bands". This auction must be carried out even if some of the FCC's permissions have expired, and it involves receiving payments, handling applications, and granting licenses.