Overview
Title
To award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the individuals who fought for or with the United States against the armed forces of Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater and the impacted Saskinax people on Attu, whose lives, culture, and community were irrevocably changed from December 8, 1941, to August 15, 1945.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9336 wants to give a special gold medal to people who helped the U.S. fight in the Pacific during World War II and to the Saskinax̂ people who were affected. It also plans to sell copies of the medal to help raise money for the U.S. Mint.
Summary AI
H.R. 9336 proposes awarding a Congressional Gold Medal to those who fought for or alongside the United States against Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater and to the Saskinax̂ people affected during World War II. The bill recognizes the sacrifices and bravery of military forces and civilians from December 8, 1941, to August 15, 1945, in events such as the Bataan Death March and the reclaiming of Attu. It also allows the creation of duplicate bronze medals to be sold, with proceeds benefiting the U.S. Mint. The gold medal will be displayed at the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the Defenders of Bataan, Corregidor, and Attu Congressional Gold Medal Act, aims to collectively award a Congressional Gold Medal to individuals who served the United States during World War II against the forces of Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater. Additionally, it recognizes the impacted Saskinax people from Attu, whose lives were permanently altered during the war. The bill outlines the significant historical events and the bravery exhibited by these groups between December 8, 1941, and August 15, 1945.
Summary of Significant Issues
A notable issue present in the legislation is the absence of a defined budget or funding source for the creation and issuance of the Congressional Gold Medal, which could raise concerns regarding unchecked government expenditure. Furthermore, there is ambiguity in the process for selecting recipients for this honor, potentially leading to perceptions of unfairness or favoritism. The inclusion of specific groups and the exclusion of others, such as members of the Pacific Fleet or the Hawaiian Department, in the definition of those eligible for recognition underlines a need for clearer justification.
Additionally, while the bill allows for the sale of bronze duplicate medals, it lacks an oversight or competitive bidding process, which opens the door to potential inefficiencies or favoritism. There is also no clear directive as to what should occur with any profits from the sales of these duplicates, thus posing ethical concerns.
Impacts of the Bill on the Public
If enacted, the bill would broadly serve as a symbolic recognition of historical sacrifice and valor, fostering national pride and historical awareness among the general public. However, without clear financial planning or oversight, there could be public concern about potential government wastefulness, particularly in a climate where fiscal responsibility is highly scrutinized.
The public might also express concern about the opacity of the selection criteria for medal recipients, which could lead to debates about fairness and transparency. Overall, while the bill seeks to honor and remember the heroism of the past, the management of its financial and organizational aspects will greatly influence public perception.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
Stakeholders directly impacted by this bill include the veterans and families of those who served in the Pacific theater, as well as the Saskinax people of Attu. For these groups, the Congressional Gold Medal serves as an important acknowledgment of their historical hardships and contributions, potentially providing a sense of closure and public acknowledgment for their sacrifices.
Conversely, the Smithsonian Institution, tasked with housing and potentially displaying the gold medal, may benefit from increased public interest and visitation. Yet, it may also face logistical and resource burdens if expected to comply with the bill's wide-reaching display recommendations, lacking any specified financial support or guidelines.
Overall, while the act's intentions are rooted in historical recognition and respect, its execution seems to lack clarity in several operational areas, which stakeholders will likely scrutinize as the legislative process unfolds.
Issues
The bill does not specify the cost or funding sources for awarding the Congressional Gold Medal, raising concerns about potential wasteful or unchecked spending (Sections 1, 4, and 7).
The lack of criteria or a selection process for determining the recipients of the Congressional Gold Medal could lead to questions about fairness, favoritism, or transparency in the award process (Sections 1 and 4).
The section on duplicate medals allows for the Secretary to strike and sell duplicates without oversight or a competitive bidding process, which could lead to wasteful spending or favoritism (Section 5).
The exclusion of members of the Pacific Fleet or the Hawaiian Department in the definition of 'individuals who fought for or with the United States' might not be clear in purpose and could require justification to prevent potential misunderstandings (Section 3).
The language 'such amounts as may be necessary' in the authority to use funds is ambiguous, allowing for broad interpretation that could lead to overspending (Section 7).
The section mandating the gold medal to be given to the Smithsonian Institution may be perceived as favoritism without considering alternatives, which could be controversial (Section 4).
There is no mention of what should happen with any profits from the sale of bronze duplicates, which could lead to potential misuse of funds or ethical concerns (Section 5).
The lack of detailed geographic delineation in defining the 'Pacific theater' could create confusion about which areas are included (Section 3).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it can be referred to as the “Defenders of Bataan, Corregidor, and Attu Congressional Gold Medal Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress acknowledges the bravery and sacrifices made by United States and Filipino forces during World War II, highlighting events like the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Bataan Death March, and the battles in the Philippines and Attu, and urges recognition of the courage shown by those who fought in these challenging circumstances.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines terms used in the act, such as "impacted Saskinax̂ people," meaning indigenous people on certain Alaskan islands during World War II. It also explains "individuals who fought for or with the United States" in the Pacific, describing who qualifies and who doesn't, and defines areas like the "Pacific theater" and what constitutes "resistance or battle." The role of "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Treasury.
4. Congressional gold medal Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the awarding of a Congressional gold medal to individuals who defended various locations in the Pacific during World War II, as well as the Saskinax̂ people who were affected. After being awarded, the medal will be housed at the National Museum of American History, where it may also be displayed at other significant locations related to World War II.
5. Duplicate medals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary is allowed to make and sell bronze duplicates of a specific gold medal, as long as the sale price covers all costs associated with producing the medals, such as labor and materials.
6. Status of medals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Under this section, the medals created by the act are officially recognized as national medals and are considered collectible items according to U.S. financial regulations.
7. Authority to use fund amounts; proceeds of sale Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the use of money from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover the costs of making medals. It also states that any money made from selling duplicate bronze medals should be returned to this fund.