Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an income tax credit for the costs of certain fertility treatments.

ELI5 AI

The "IVF for Families Act" is a new plan that gives people money back on their taxes to help pay for treatments that help them have babies. This plan lets people get back up to $15,000 each year for certain medical treatments to help with having a baby.

Summary AI

H.R. 9333, titled the "IVF for Families Act," proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to introduce a tax credit for expenses related to certain fertility treatments. This bill aims to help individuals by providing a credit of up to $15,000 per year for qualified fertility treatment expenses. Eligible treatments include both those involving external handling of human egg, sperm, or embryo, like in vitro fertilization, and internal processes, like ovulation induction. A requirement is set for married couples to file joint returns to avail of this benefit.

Published

2024-08-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-09
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9333ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
672
Pages:
4
Sentences:
23

Language

Nouns: 199
Verbs: 47
Adjectives: 36
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 34
Entities: 41

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.11
Average Sentence Length:
29.22
Token Entropy:
4.80
Readability (ARI):
15.92

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed bill, introduced in the House of Representatives on August 9, 2024, aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by establishing a tax credit for certain fertility treatment expenses. Officially titled the "IVF for Families Act," this legislation would allow individuals to claim a tax credit for expenses incurred from fertility treatments, with a maximum credit limit of $15,000 per year. The bill categorizes qualifying procedures into those that involve handling human egg, sperm, and embryo outside the body, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), and those that do not, like ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination. Notably, to claim this credit, married couples must file jointly, and the credit cannot be applied if the expense has been reimbursed by insurance or claimed elsewhere as a deduction or credit.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary issues highlighted is the absence of income limitations for eligibility, which could result in higher-income individuals disproportionately benefiting from the credit. Additionally, the requirement that married couples must file joint tax returns to be eligible for the credit may disadvantage couples who have valid reasons to file separately. The bill also lacks clear guidelines on what specifically qualifies as fertility treatment expenses, potentially leading to confusion or misuse of the credit. Furthermore, there is ambiguity about whether the $15,000 credit limit applies per individual or per couple. Lastly, the complexity of denying double benefits for expenses covered by insurance or claimed under other provisions might pose challenges for taxpayers, especially those without professional tax assistance.

Impact on the Public Broadly

If enacted, this bill would provide financial relief to individuals and families seeking fertility treatments by reducing the overall cost burden through a tax credit. This could increase access to such treatments and potentially lead to more families being able to conceive. However, without income caps, the benefits might skew towards higher-income earners who are more likely to cover costs not covered by insurance and have greater tax liabilities. This lack of equitable distribution might not align with the broader objectives of offering support to those most in need of financial assistance for fertility treatments.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For prospective parents facing the high costs of fertility treatments, this bill could help make such healthcare options more financially feasible. It might particularly benefit those who rely on assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility clinics and healthcare providers could see an increase in demand for services due to the financial incentives offered by the tax credit.

Conversely, couples who file taxes separately for financial or personal reasons might feel unfairly excluded from the benefits of the credit. Low-income families may also not see much advantage from the credit if they lack the upfront funds to pay for expensive fertility procedures, even with the anticipated reimbursement.

Tax professionals could experience an increased workload as individuals and families seek guidance to navigate the complexities of claiming this new credit and ensuring they avoid the double benefits restrictions.

Overall, while the bill aims to support families pursuing fertility treatments, its current structure and guidelines may need adjustments to ensure equitable and efficient implementation that truly assists those in need while maintaining fairness across the socio-economic spectrum.

Financial Assessment

The proposed H.R. 9333, known as the "IVF for Families Act," is designed to provide financial relief to individuals undergoing fertility treatments by offering a tax credit for certain expenses. The bill suggests that eligible taxpayers could receive up to $15,000 per year for qualifying fertility treatment costs. This financial incentive aims to reduce the economic burden associated with various fertility treatments, potentially making such procedures more accessible to a broader range of individuals.

Financial Provisions

The cornerstone of this legislative proposal is the introduction of a federal tax credit specifically for fertility treatments. Under this provision, individuals can claim a credit equal to the amount spent on qualified fertility treatments, up to a maximum of $15,000 per taxable year. The treatments covered include both procedures that involve handling human eggs, sperm, and embryos outside the body, like in vitro fertilization, and those that are performed internally, such as ovulation induction.

Issues and Concerns

There are a number of concerns surrounding the financial implications of this bill:

  1. Absence of Income Limitations: The bill does not specify any income limitations for eligibility. This means that the $15,000 credit could benefit higher-income individuals disproportionately since they are more likely to afford the upfront costs of fertility treatments. This raises questions about whether the credit's benefits would be equitably distributed among taxpayers.

  2. Joint Filing Requirement: The bill mandates that married couples must file joint tax returns to claim the credit. This could disadvantage couples who, due to personal or financial considerations, choose to file separately. The $15,000 limit could thus be unattainable for those not filing jointly, potentially excluding them from obtaining financial relief.

  3. Unclear Definition of Qualified Expenses: The lack of specific guidelines regarding what constitutes 'qualified fertility treatment expenses' could lead to confusion and possible misuse. For taxpayers to confidently claim the $15,000 credit, clearer definitions and examples are necessary to avoid ambiguity and the risk of noncompliance.

  4. Ambiguity in the Dollar Limitation: The bill is unclear on whether the $15,000 cap is applicable per individual or per married couple filing jointly. This ambiguity could lead to misunderstandings and incorrect claims, particularly during tax preparation.

  5. Denial of Double Benefits: The bill contains provisions that prevent taxpayers from claiming the credit if they have already received insurance reimbursements or other deductions for the same expenses. This could complicate matters for taxpayers and necessitate professional tax assistance, which might not be readily available to all, thus creating a barrier to accessing the credit.

  6. Enforcement and Oversight: The bill does not address how the tax credit will be enforced or monitored, raising concerns over potential fraudulent claims. Without clear enforcement mechanisms, there could be administrative difficulties, causing inconsistencies and errors in the application of this credit.

Overall, while the financial assistance offered by H.R. 9333 could be considerably beneficial in reducing the costs of fertility treatments, the issues highlighted suggest a need for clearer guidelines and potential amendments to ensure that the credit is applied fairly and effectively.

Issues

  • The section on 'Credit for certain fertility treatments' (Sec. 23A) does not specify income limitations for eligibility for the tax credit. This could lead to higher-income individuals disproportionately benefiting from the credit, raising concerns about fairness and the distribution of taxpayer-funded benefits. (Section 23A, Issue 6)

  • The requirement for married couples to file jointly to claim the credit might disadvantage those who, for valid financial or personal reasons, choose to file separately. This stipulation is perceived as unfair and could limit access to the credit for some couples. (Sections 2 and 23A, Issues 2 and 4)

  • The lack of detailed guidelines or criteria for what constitutes 'qualified fertility treatment expenses' could result in confusion among tax filers and potential misuse or abuse of the credit. Clear definitions and examples could help mitigate this risk. (Sections 2 and 23A, Issues 1 and 1)

  • The bill's language is ambiguous regarding the $15,000 dollar limitation of the credit, specifically whether this limit is per individual or per couple for married couples filing jointly. This lack of clarity could lead to misunderstandings and improper claims. (Section 23A, Issue 3)

  • The provision denying double benefits for certain insurance reimbursements or other deductions under subsection (e) could be complex for taxpayers to understand, particularly without professional tax assistance. This complexity may create barriers to accessing the credit. (Sections 2 and 23A, Issues 4 and 5)

  • The bill lacks specific criteria or regulations for determining eligibility for the credit beyond a general description of fertility treatments. This could lead to varied interpretations and application of the credit, risking inconsistency in its implementation. (Section 23A, Issues 1 and 2)

  • The bill does not outline how the credit will be enforced or monitored, raising concerns about potential fraudulent claims or administrative errors. Adequate oversight mechanisms are necessary to ensure the credit's integrity. (Section 23A, Issue 7)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The short title of this legislation is the "IVF for Families Act."

2. Credit for certain fertility treatments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section introduces a tax credit for individuals to cover certain fertility treatment expenses, up to a limit of $15,000 per year. It specifies that the credit can only be claimed if the expenses are not covered by other deductions, credits, or insurance, and requires married couples to file jointly to qualify.

Money References

  • “(b) Dollar limitation.—The amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed $15,000.

23A. Credit for certain fertility treatments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, individuals can receive a tax credit for amounts spent on qualifying fertility treatments, up to $15,000 per year. The credit is only available if the expense has not been claimed elsewhere, and it cannot be used for expenses reimbursed by insurance.

Money References

  • (b) Dollar limitation.—The amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed $15,000.