Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the excise tax on investment income of private colleges and universities.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants private colleges and universities to pay more money from the income they earn by investing, with higher taxes if they raise their student costs too much. It also means more schools would have to pay this tax if they have a certain amount of money saved for each student.

Summary AI

H.R. 9331, known as the “Higher Education Accountability Tax Act,” aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to change the excise tax on investment income for private colleges and universities. The bill proposes increasing the tax rate from 1.4% to 10% and sets an even higher rate of 20% for institutions that have increased their net price by more than the rate of inflation. It also expands the number of institutions subject to this tax by lowering the threshold related to endowment value per student from $500,000 to $250,000. These changes would take effect for taxable years starting after December 31, 2024.

Published

2024-08-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-09
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9331ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
511
Pages:
3
Sentences:
16

Language

Nouns: 149
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 34
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 32
Entities: 41

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.13
Average Sentence Length:
31.94
Token Entropy:
4.77
Readability (ARI):
17.25

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Higher Education Accountability Tax Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 concerning the excise tax levied on the investment income of private colleges and universities. It seeks to increase the tax rate applied to this income significantly, from the current 1.4 percent to 10 percent. Furthermore, an additional provision would bring this rate up to 20 percent for those institutions where tuition has increased beyond the inflation rate. The bill also plans to broaden the scope of institutions subject to this tax by lowering the endowment threshold from $500,000 to $250,000. These changes would take effect starting January 1, 2025.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the noteworthy aspects of this bill is the substantial increase in the excise tax rate from 1.4 percent to 10 percent for private colleges and universities. Such a hike could significantly affect the financial resources and operational stability of these institutions. The criteria for defining a "net-price-increase institution" may not be fully clear, particularly concerning the comparison of tuition increases to the Consumer Price Index, which could lead to ambiguity in the bill's implementation. Additionally, the 20 percent tax rate for these "net-price-increase institutions" presents a challenge, as it might put excessive pressure on colleges and universities struggling to manage tuition amidst rising costs.

Another point of concern is the reduction of the threshold for institutions subject to this tax—from $500,000 to $250,000. This change could disproportionately affect smaller colleges and universities, making it more challenging for them to manage financial resources compared to larger institutions. The bill's effective date does not leave much time for these institutions to adapt to the new financial burden, potentially causing administrative and financial strain. Moreover, the lack of a clear definition for the term "applicable educational institution" could result in confusion and possible misapplication of the tax amendments.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, if enacted, this bill could lead to significant financial shifts within the private higher education sector. For students and families, the financial stability of institutions could impact tuition fees, educational offerings, and campus resources. The potential increase in operational costs might be passed on to students, leading to higher tuition and fees, which could, in turn, affect access to education for some.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Private colleges and universities are the primary stakeholders affected by this bill. The increased financial burden may strain their resources, possibly affecting scholarship opportunities, faculty salaries, and student services. Smaller institutions might face greater challenges, potentially forcing them to re-evaluate their operational models or, in extreme cases, leading to closures or mergers with larger entities.

For students, particularly those attending smaller institutions or those reliant on financial aid, the bill could lead to increased tuition costs and a decrease in educational resources if colleges divert funds to accommodate the tax requirements. Simultaneously, policymakers and advocates for affordability in higher education might view the bill as a necessary tool for encouraging financial accountability and transparency among private colleges and universities. The debate could also extend to whether such tax increases are appropriate tools for influencing educational financial policy or whether they may have unintended negative consequences.

Financial Assessment

The proposed bill, H.R. 9331, introduces a series of financial measures aimed at altering the tax landscape for private colleges and universities. These changes are encapsulated in the "Higher Education Accountability Tax Act" and involve significant revisions to the existing excise tax structure on these institutions' investment income.

Increase in Excise Tax Rate

The bill proposes a substantial rise in the excise tax rate on investment income for private colleges and universities, increasing it from the current 1.4 percent to 10 percent. This marked increase represents a significant financial impact on these institutions, potentially affecting their operational and financial sustainability. Such a sharp rise in tax obligations could lead to decreased investment in educational facilities and resources, thereby impacting the quality of education offered.

Additional Tax for Price Increases

Further, the bill stipulates an even steeper tax rate of 20 percent for institutions classified as "net-price-increase institutions." This designation applies to those whose net price increase surpasses the rate of inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. While this measure aims to curb rapid tuition increases, it could impose additional financial pressure on institutions that are already grappling with rising operational costs. The criteria for this classification may not be sufficiently clear, potentially leading to implementation challenges.

Expansion of Institutions Subject to Tax

The bill also seeks to broaden the scope of institutions subject to this excise tax by lowering the threshold for endowment value per student from $500,000 to $250,000. This change implies that smaller colleges and universities, which may have previously been exempt, could now fall within this taxable bracket. These institutions might find themselves disproportionately impacted due to their generally smaller financial buffers compared to larger, well-endowed schools.

Effective Date and Implementation Challenges

The amendments would take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024. This timeframe may not offer adequate preparation for the institutions affected by these changes, possibly leading to administrative and financial strain as they adjust to the new tax calculations. This aspect raises concerns about the readiness of these colleges and universities to comply with such significant shifts in taxation policy.

Overall, the financial implications of H.R. 9331 are extensive and could reshape the fiscal landscape of higher education institutions. The potential impact on financial stability, alongside the administrative burden of adapting to these changes, underscores the need for careful consideration and analysis of the bill's proposals.

Issues

  • The significant increase in the excise tax rate from 1.4 percent to 10 percent on private colleges and universities' investment income (Section 2(a)) could have a substantial financial impact, potentially affecting their operational and financial stability.

  • The criteria for defining a 'net-price-increase institution' in Section 2(b)(2) may not be adequately clarified, especially concerning the determination of net price in comparison with the Consumer Price Index, leading to potential ambiguity in implementation.

  • The additional tax increase to 20 percent for 'net-price-increase institutions' (Section 2(b)(1)) raises concerns about the pressure it could exert on institutions managing their pricing in line with inflation, which may already be problematic due to rising operational costs.

  • The reduction of the threshold from $500,000 to $250,000 for institutions subject to the tax (Section 2(c)) could disproportionately impact smaller colleges and universities, potentially straining their financial resources more than larger institutions.

  • The effective date of the amendments, set for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024 (Section 2(d)), might not provide adequate time for affected institutions to adjust to the financial and administrative changes required by the new tax calculations.

  • The lack of definition for 'applicable educational institution' (not directly mentioned in the text but implied under the bill's scope) could create confusion and potential misapplication of the tax changes due to uncertainty about which institutions are affected.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act is called the "Higher Education Accountability Tax Act", which serves as the short title for the legislation.

2. Modification of excise tax on investment income of private colleges and universities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the excise tax on investment income for private colleges and universities by increasing the rate from 1.4% to 10%, with an additional increase to 20% for institutions where tuition rises faster than inflation. It also lowers the threshold for institutions subject to the tax from $500,000 to $250,000, and these changes take effect from January 1, 2025.

Money References

  • (c) Expansion of institutions subject to tax.—Section 4968(b)(1)(D) of such Code is amended by striking “$500,000” and inserting “$250,000”. (d) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024. ---