Overview

Title

To make publicly available information on sustainable aviation fuel production and imports, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9327 is a plan to share information about special airplane fuel that's better for the Earth. This fuel is made from plants or other materials and helps keep the air cleaner compared to regular jet fuel.

Summary AI

H.R. 9327, known as the “Sustainable Aviation Fuel Information Act,” aims to make information about sustainable aviation fuel production and imports publicly available. The bill requires the Secretary of Energy to include data on sustainable aviation fuel in specific energy reports, detailing the type, origin, and volume of feedstock used, as well as the total amount produced and imported. It mandates the use of reliable and non-duplicative reporting methods to ensure accurate data. The bill also defines key terms related to aviation fuel and emphasizes the need for significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional jet fuels.

Published

2024-08-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-09
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9327ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
816
Pages:
5
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 262
Verbs: 42
Adjectives: 47
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 20
Entities: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.33
Average Sentence Length:
48.00
Token Entropy:
4.92
Readability (ARI):
26.10

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Sustainable Aviation Fuel Information Act," aims to make data about sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production and imports more accessible to the public. This bill mandates that the Secretary of Energy, through the Energy Information Administration (EIA), include SAF data in specific energy reports like the "Petroleum Supply Monthly" and "Weekly Petroleum Status Report." The reports would cover details such as the type and origin of feedstock used in SAF production and the volumes produced and imported. It also defines key terms such as "biomass" and "lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions reduction percentage" to ensure consistency in understanding and implementation.

Significant Issues

One notable issue is the absence of any specific timeline or deadlines for implementing the reporting requirements. This lack of urgency could result in delays and reduce the accountability of the agencies responsible for collecting and reporting this data. Furthermore, the bill does not clearly assign responsibility or oversight for enforcing these reporting requirements, which could lead to inefficiencies and non-compliance.

Another problem lies in the vagueness of the language used for data collection, particularly from foreign countries. The phrase "to the maximum extent practicable" leaves room for interpretation, potentially resulting in inconsistent reporting standards internationally. Moreover, the bill does not outline consequences for failing to report or inaccurately reporting data, weakening the potential effectiveness and enforcement of these provisions.

The bill also references technical standards that may not be readily understandable to the general public or those not closely involved with the industry. This lack of clarity might require supplementary explanation or resources for stakeholders to fully comprehend the standards and requirements.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, by promising more transparency and availability of sustainable aviation fuel data, the bill could contribute positively to public awareness and understanding of renewable energy sources. This transparency could help inform both policy-making and consumer choices, potentially accelerating the transition towards more sustainable aviation practices.

The bill may positively impact environmental advocacy groups and researchers who require more detailed and reliable data about fuel production to argue for or assess sustainability efforts. However, the lack of clear guidelines and potential additional costs associated with implementing these reporting requirements might present challenges for government agencies and industries involved. Without explicit deadlines and accountability measures, there is also a risk of inaction or inconsistent data collection, which could undermine the bill's goals.

For policymakers and regulators, the clearly defined terms and provisions aim to standardize the evaluation of sustainable fuels, which could help in developing future environmental policies and regulations. Nonetheless, the technical standards mentioned might pose challenges, especially for stakeholders unfamiliar with the intricate details and measurements related to sustainable aviation fuel. Overall, the bill's efficacy will significantly depend on its implementation and the clarity with which its provisions are executed.

Issues

  • Section 2: The lack of a specified timeline or deadline for the reporting requirements could lead to delays and lack of accountability, affecting the efficiency and effectiveness of the bill.

  • Section 2: There is no clear designation of responsibility or oversight for ensuring compliance with the reporting requirements, which could result in inefficiency and lack of enforcement.

  • Section 3: The definition of 'biomass' refers to the Internal Revenue Code, which may not be readily accessible or understandable for readers unfamiliar with it, potentially leading to confusion or misinterpretation.

  • Section 2: The requirement to collect data from each foreign country 'to the maximum extent practicable' is vague, which may result in inconsistent data collection and reporting standards across international regions, affecting the reliability of the data.

  • Section 3: The conditions for certifying 'sustainable aviation fuel,' such as the requirement of at least a 50 percent reduction in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, may require further explanation regarding the measurement and verification process.

  • Section 3: The use of technical standards such as ASTM International Standards might be unclear to those not familiar with industry-specific standards, potentially necessitating additional explanation or reference.

  • Section 2: The section does not outline consequences for failing to report or inaccurately reporting data, potentially reducing the effectiveness and enforceability of the reporting requirements.

  • Section 2: The potential need for significant resources to implement the new reporting requirements is not addressed, leading to possible unanticipated costs or resource allocation issues.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the Act is officially named the "Sustainable Aviation Fuel Information Act."

2. Reported data Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Energy, through the Energy Information Administration, must add data on the production and importation of sustainable aviation fuel to certain energy reports. This includes information about the type, origin, and volume of materials used, and the total amount of fuel made or imported from states and other countries. The data should be collected reliably without overlap, and this section doesn't change existing energy laws.

3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines several terms used in the Act: "applicable material" includes specific types of fatty acids and esters; "biomass" is defined per the Internal Revenue Code; "lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions reduction percentage" refers to how much cleaner sustainable aviation fuel is compared to regular jet fuel, based on scientific models or international standards; and "sustainable aviation fuel" is a type of fuel that must meet certain standards, not be made with non-biomass feedstocks or certain byproducts, and must reduce emissions by at least 50%.