Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to submit a report on coordination in the public and private sectors in responding to ransomware attacks on financial institutions, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
In H.R. 9315, the government wants to make sure that banks and other money places are working well with each other and with secret agents to stop bad computer people from taking their money. They are going to write a big paper about how they're doing and see if they need new rules to do a better job.
Summary AI
H.R. 9315, also known as the "Public and Private Sector Ransomware Response Coordination Act of 2024," requires the Secretary of the Treasury to submit a report to Congress on how the public and private sectors are working together to tackle ransomware attacks on financial institutions. The report must cover topics like current collaboration levels, information sharing among government agencies, and whether further legislation is needed to enhance these efforts. The Secretary is also tasked with recommending new policies to improve response and communication, and a briefing on the findings must be given to Congress 15 months after the law's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, titled the “Public and Private Sector Ransomware Response Coordination Act of 2024,” aims to enhance the coordination between public and private sectors in dealing specifically with ransomware attacks targeting financial institutions. Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, this bill tasks the Secretary of the Treasury with preparing and submitting a detailed report to various Congressional committees within a year of the bill's enactment. This report is expected to explore current public-private collaboration levels, information sharing, legislative needs, and impediments financial institutions face in reporting such attacks.
Summary of Significant Issues
A primary concern about the bill is the lack of specific criteria or metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the coordination between public and private entities. Without clear benchmarks, the reports generated might be inconsistent and subjective, diminishing their utility. Furthermore, the bill does not outline any funding or resources to support the implementation of these activities, which could hinder their execution due to financial or logistical constraints.
Accountability measures also appear to be absent, as the bill doesn't specify consequences should the Secretary of the Treasury fail to meet deadlines for delivering the report and subsequent briefings. This lack of accountability could lead to delays in addressing the ransomware threats that this bill seeks to mitigate.
Additionally, the selection of "appropriate congressional committees" is briefly defined but lacks transparency regarding the rationale behind selecting these specific committees, which might suggest a narrow selection process. Definitions provided in the bill might clash with existing cybersecurity and financial regulations, creating potential discrepancies.
The assumption that further legislation could enhance information utility and access may prove problematic if it places additional administrative burdens on financial institutions. Lastly, the bill does not include a mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of its recommended policy initiatives, which could result in misguided directives.
Impact on the Public
If effectively enacted, this legislation could create a more robust framework for handling and preventing ransomware events, potentially protecting individual and business interests tied to financial institutions. However, without clear funding and criteria for success, its implementation could face significant challenges that might limit its effectiveness.
The bill’s focus on enhancing coordination could indirectly benefit the general public by potentially increasing the security and reliability of financial systems. By involving both public agencies and private sectors, the bill aims to foster an environment where information about imminent threats is shared efficiently, possibly mitigating the frequency and impact of attacks.
Impact on Stakeholders
Financial institutions and cybersecurity entities stand to be the most directly affected groups. Financial institutions might benefit from clearer guidelines and improved governmental support in the event of an attack, yet they may also face increased reporting obligations and compliance burdens without additional resources or support mechanisms.
For government agencies, the bill could streamline cooperation procedures and create clearer channels for action and information sharing, enhancing their ability to respond to cyber threats swiftly. However, without proper accountability and budgeting, they could struggle with the added tasks without achieving significant improvements.
In conclusion, while the bill presents an appealing framework for tackling ransomware coordination challenges, its success and impact could heavily depend on how clarity, resource allocation, and accountability are addressed in its implementation.
Issues
The request for a report on coordination between public and private sectors (Section 2) does not specify metrics or criteria for determining the level of coordination or successful outcomes, potentially leading to subjective or inconsistent reporting.
The bill does not mention any budget or funding sources for the activities and entities mentioned in Section 2, which could result in issues with resource allocation or lack of funding.
There are no accountability measures or consequences described in Section 2 if the Secretary of the Treasury fails to meet the deadlines for submitting the report and briefing, possibly leading to delays in addressing ransomware issues.
The term 'appropriate congressional committees' is defined in Section 2, but the bill does not clarify why these specific committees were chosen or if alternatives were considered, which could imply a narrow or biased selection process.
The definitions provided in Section 2 might not align with other relevant cybersecurity or financial regulations, potentially leading to conflicts or discrepancies.
The assumption in Section 2 that further legislation might increase utility and timely access to information does not consider potential administrative burdens on financial institutions.
Section 2 lacks any evaluation or oversight mechanism to assess the effectiveness of the recommended policy initiatives or the success of the report's implementation in improving ransomware response.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act is officially named the “Public and Private Sector Ransomware Response Coordination Act of 2024.”
2. Report on coordination in the public and private sectors in responding to ransomware attacks on financial institutions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of the Treasury to report to specific Congressional committees within a year about how well the public and private sectors work together to respond to and prevent ransomware attacks on financial institutions. The report should cover topics such as the current level of coordination, the effectiveness of information sharing, and the need for further legislation or policy initiatives. A classification of "unclassified" is recommended for the report, with a possibility of a classified section if necessary.