Overview

Title

To take certain land in the State of Washington into trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to give some land in Washington to the Puyallup Tribe to take care of, but they can't use it for casinos, and the U.S. won't fix any old problems the land has.

Summary AI

H. R. 929 proposes to take approximately 17.264 acres of land in Pierce County, Washington, into trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation. The land becomes part of the reservation and is managed under the same rules as other tribal trust lands. The bill also makes clear that the United States will not be responsible for any contamination that occurred on this land before it was taken into trust. Furthermore, the land cannot be used for gaming activities as defined under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Published

2024-03-12
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-03-12
Package ID: BILLS-118hr929rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
726
Pages:
6
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 250
Verbs: 39
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 48
Entities: 72

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.08
Average Sentence Length:
51.86
Token Entropy:
4.70
Readability (ARI):
27.24

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Puyallup Tribe of Indians Land Into Trust Confirmation Act of 2023" aims to transfer approximately 17.264 acres of land in Pierce County, Washington, into trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation. This legislative action involves taking land into federal trust, officially held by the United States government for the tribe's benefit. The bill lays out the specific parcels to be included and establishes several conditions regarding their administration, environmental liability, and usage restrictions.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several critical issues arise from the bill's provisions. One central concern is the lack of clarity about how the land will be used once it is taken into trust. The bill does not specify any objectives or plans for the land, which can lead to uncertainty about its future and potential benefits to the tribe.

Another issue is the absence of information on the financial responsibilities entailed in maintaining or developing the land after it is in trust. This omission could lead to budgetary uncertainties for both the Puyallup Tribe and governmental bodies involved.

There is also a clause stating that the United States will not be liable for any environmental contamination that occurred on the land before it was taken into trust. This creates a vague accountability framework, raising questions about how pre-existing environmental conditions will be managed or remedied.

Moreover, the bill explicitly prohibits the land from being used for certain types of gaming, which might limit economic opportunities for the Puyallup Tribe and restrict their development of autonomous economic enterprises.

Lastly, the title of the Act is broad and lacks specific information about the bill's implications beyond the sequence of taking land into trust. This could lead to ambiguity regarding the full scope and intent of the legislation.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill could have various implications for the public. For nearby communities, the transfer of land into trust might lead to changes in land use that impact local economies or environments. The process of taking land into trust often entails federal oversight, which might assure some stakeholders of managed development, though it could also limit flexibility and responsiveness to local needs.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Puyallup Tribe: For the Puyallup Tribe, the bill presents both opportunities and challenges. Gaining trust status for their land could enhance their sovereignty and autonomy, allowing them greater say in managing these assets. However, the prohibition on gaming might infringe upon potential economic development routes that have proven beneficial for many other tribes across the nation.

Environmental Stakeholders: Those concerned with environmental protection might find the clause relinquishing U.S. liability for past contamination concerning, as it leaves unclear who will be responsible for addressing any pre-existing environmental issues.

Local Governments and Residents: Local governments and nearby residents may experience indirect effects as the land transfer alters jurisdiction and potentially impacts local tax bases, given that trust lands are typically exempt from certain state and local taxes.

In summary, while the bill has a specific legal and procedural focus, it raises questions and challenges that deserve further exploration to ensure both the effective support and autonomy of the Puyallup Tribe and the balanced development of community and environmental interests.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify the purpose or intended use of the land once it is taken into trust. Without clear administrative objectives (Section 2), stakeholders may question how the land will be used, which can impact the transparency and effectiveness of planning and decision-making.

  • There is a lack of information about the financial implications or responsibilities for maintaining or developing the land once it is in trust (Section 2). This omission could affect budgeting and resource allocation, creating financial uncertainty for both the tribe and government entities.

  • The provision that the United States shall not be liable for any environmental contamination prior to the land being taken into trust (Section 2) leads to an unclear environmental accountability framework. This could raise legal and ethical concerns about addressing pre-existing environmental damage.

  • The prohibition of gaming on the land (Section 2) might impact potential economic development opportunities for the Puyallup Tribe, and the reasons for this decision are not explained. This raises political and economic questions about the restrictions placed on tribal sovereignty and economic autonomy.

  • The short title of the Act (Section 1) is broad and may lack specificity, potentially causing ambiguity about the bill’s full implications and scope. Clear and detailed titles are often essential for stakeholders to quickly understand the nature and impact of legislation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill gives it a short name, allowing people to refer to it easily as the “Puyallup Tribe of Indians Land Into Trust Confirmation Act of 2023.”

2. Land to be taken into trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section details that 17.264 acres of land in Pierce County, Washington, are being taken into trust by the United States for the Puyallup Tribe. It specifies the land parcels involved, dictates that the land will be managed according to laws for tribal trust property, states that the U.S. will not be responsible for any pre-existing environmental contamination, and prohibits the land's use for certain types of gaming.