Overview

Title

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act to combat campus sexual assault, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

In H.R. 9264, the "Campus Accountability and Safety Act," Congress wants schools to be better at helping students who report being hurt or unsafe, especially in cases of sexual assault. The bill would make schools share more information about these problems, have people trained to help those affected, and face penalties if they do not follow the new rules.

Summary AI

The bill, titled the "Campus Accountability and Safety Act," aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Jeanne Clery Act to improve how colleges and universities handle cases of campus sexual assault and other related crimes. It introduces detailed reporting and transparency requirements, enhances support for victims, and mandates training for campus officials. The legislation requires institutions to have trained specialists to support victims and proposes penalties for non-compliance with these requirements. Additionally, it includes provisions to expand grants and calls for a study to assess the effectiveness of these measures.

Published

2024-08-02
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-02
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9264ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
7,013
Pages:
43
Sentences:
87

Language

Nouns: 2,002
Verbs: 487
Adjectives: 486
Adverbs: 53
Numbers: 151
Entities: 157

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.43
Average Sentence Length:
80.61
Token Entropy:
5.32
Readability (ARI):
43.21

AnalysisAI

The bill, known as the "Campus Accountability and Safety Act," aims to address and combat campus sexual assault by amending the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act. It seeks to enhance transparency, improve campus safety, and provide better support for survivors of sexual violence, stalking, and related offenses on college campuses across the United States.

General Summary

The legislation proposes amendments requiring universities to make their safety policies and crime statistics more accessible, including posting them online in multiple languages. It mandates more detailed reporting on incidents of sexual assault and related crimes, introduces specific definitions for key terms, and outlines obligations for Title IX coordinators and responsible employees. Furthermore, the bill requires establishing a user-friendly campus safety website, designates trained specialists to support survivors, and involves creating training programs for staff. It also seeks to amend existing laws to include sexual harassment as a focus area for combating violent crimes on campuses.

Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from the proposed changes. One primary concern lies in the potential privacy implications associated with more detailed reporting requirements. Ensuring students' personal information is not inadvertently disclosed remains a substantial challenge. Additionally, the stipulation for a "user-friendly" safety website is vague, potentially causing compliance variability and financial strain for educational institutions. Furthermore, the bill's reliance on references to other laws without extensive context could complicate understanding and enforcement for those less familiar with the legal landscape. Finally, the requirement for institutions to determine an "adequate number" of sexual violence specialists through a negotiated rulemaking process might delay effective implementation.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill could improve campus safety and provide greater transparency for students and parents regarding university crime policies. By holding educational institutions accountable for supporting survivors and ensuring clear communication of policies, it could foster a safer environment on campuses. However, the burden of compliance, particularly the financial implications of establishing compliance frameworks, might cause stress on smaller institutions with limited resources. This could result in varied levels of implementation across different schools.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For educational institutions, particularly smaller public and private colleges, the bill represents both an opportunity and a challenge. On one hand, it encourages positive changes in campus safety protocols, potentially enhancing their reputation and making campuses more appealing to prospective students and parents. On the other hand, the administrative demands and financial burdens associated with compliance, such as setting up online reporting systems and hiring specialized staff, may prove daunting, particularly without a designated funding source.

For students, particularly those impacted by campus violence, the legislation offers heightened protection and support measures. It brings greater awareness to their rights and more resources available to them. However, implementation delays could hinder these intended benefits, particularly if institutions struggle to meet the bill's requirements.

Overall, while the Campus Accountability and Safety Act aims to effectuate necessary changes to combat campus sexual assault, its practical implications, especially concerning institutional capacity and resource allocation, require careful consideration to ensure equitable implementation and effectiveness.

Issues

  • The amendments to the Clery Act in Section 2 create potential privacy concerns. The requirement for institutions to prepare detailed reports on incidents could inadvertently lead to the release of personal identification of students, which raises ethical and legal issues around privacy protection.

  • Section 3's requirement for a publicly available, 'user-friendly' campus safety website is subjective and may lead to varying interpretations, causing potential compliance difficulties and financial burdens for educational institutions in establishing and maintaining such a platform.

  • The amendments in Section 2 frequently reference other laws, such as the Violence Against Women Act and Hate Crime Statistics Act, without providing contextual information, complicating understanding and compliance for those unfamiliar with these laws.

  • Section 4's determination of an 'adequate number of sexual and interpersonal violence specialists' left to a negotiated rulemaking process could result in delays and variability in implementation, which affects university support for survivors.

  • Section 4 implies the establishment of an online reporting system but lacks guidance or funding provisions for implementing such systems, creating potential financial challenges for smaller institutions.

  • Section 5's multiple insertions of 'sexual harassment' lack clear rationale, making it difficult to assess the necessity and appropriateness of these changes, which raises legal and policy clarity concerns.

  • In Section 4, the funding for development and execution of extensive training programs is not specified, potentially leaving smaller institutions unable to meet the requirements.

  • The reporting requirements in Section 3, specified to not disclose personally identifiable information, require strict privacy compliance, which could prove cumbersome for institutions.

  • The GAO report requirements in Section 6 lack specific criteria or methodology for evaluating the grants' effectiveness, which might result in inconsistent assessments.

  • Section 2's restructuring of offense categories without providing definitions potentially leads to interpretation issues, creating legal ambiguities in how institutions classify and report incidents.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of the act is the “Campus Accountability and Safety Act.”

2. Amendments to the Clery Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments to the Clery Act aim to enhance transparency and accountability in higher education by requiring institutions to make their campus security policies and crime statistics more accessible, including publishing them in multiple languages online. The amendments also require schools to report more detailed statistics on sexual assault and related crimes, define the terms "complainant" and "respondent," and specify obligations for Title IX coordinators and responsible employees in handling such incidents.

3. Transparency Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965 requires the creation of a user-friendly campus safety website. This website will feature roles of key officials, ongoing investigations, complaint procedures, and policies for handling sexual harassment under Title IX, while ensuring personal privacy.

4. University support for survivors of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, sexual harassment, and stalking Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that universities receiving federal funds must implement a range of measures to support survivors of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, sexual harassment, and stalking. This includes appointing trained specialists, providing detailed information and resources both online and offline, establishing processes for reporting and disciplinary actions, ensuring proper training for staff involved, and creating protections like amnesty policies for students who report such incidents.

5. Grants to combat violent crimes on campus Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 to include "sexual harassment" in various parts of the law, alongside "sexual assault," in order to address violent crimes on campus more comprehensively.

6. GAO report Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Comptroller General is required to study and report on how effective and efficient the grants are in fighting domestic violence and related issues on campuses, as part of the 2005 Violence Against Women Act. This report must be submitted within two years to relevant Senate and House Committees.