Overview
Title
To conduct a special resource study of Fort Pillow Historic State Park in Henning, Tennessee, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 926 is a plan to see if Fort Pillow, a place where an important Civil War battle happened, should become part of the special parks everyone can visit and learn history from. The government wants to study this place to decide if it’s important enough to join the other special history parks.
Summary AI
H.R. 926, also known as the "Fort Pillow National Battlefield Park Study Act," proposes conducting a special resource study of Fort Pillow Historic State Park in Henning, Tennessee. The bill emphasizes the historical significance of Fort Pillow, where a pivotal Civil War battle and massacre occurred, impacting the Union’s fight during the war. The Secretary of the Interior is tasked with evaluating the site’s national significance and determining if it should be designated as a unit of the National Historic Park System.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Fort Pillow National Battlefield Park Study Act," introduced during the 119th Congress, aims to initiate a comprehensive resource study of the Fort Pillow Historic State Park located in Henning, Tennessee. The primary objective of this bill is to evaluate the park's historical significance and determine the feasibility and suitability of designating it as a unit within the National Historic Park System. This effort acknowledges the site’s profound impact on the United States Colored Troops during the Civil War and its potential for national recognition due to its rich history.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are several significant issues present in the bill:
Budgetary Concerns: The bill lacks specificity regarding the budget for conducting the special resource study. Without detailed financial implications, there is a possibility of overspending and unaccounted expenses, which could raise concerns regarding fiscal responsibility.
Lack of Timeline: The absence of a specified timeline for the study’s completion could lead to delays, reducing accountability and potentially postponing any subsequent actions based on the study's findings.
Ambiguous Criteria for Evaluation: The bill does not clearly outline the criteria for assessing the park's national significance. This ambiguity may result in inconsistent or subjective decision-making when determining the park's eligibility to join the National Historic Park System.
Vague Suitability and Feasibility Language: The language specifying what would make the designation of the park suitable or feasible is not well defined. This vagueness could lead to various interpretations and subjective judgments.
Lack of Public Involvement: There is no provision for public or stakeholder involvement in the study. This omission may raise concerns about transparency and inclusiveness in the decision-making process, potentially reducing public trust in the outcomes.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the successful implementation of this bill could enhance historical awareness and education by potentially elevating Fort Pillow to a national battlefield park. This designation could preserve the site’s cultural and historical narratives, which play a crucial role in understanding a pivotal event in U.S. history. It could also potentially increase tourism and local economic activity in the Henning area.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Local Communities and Businesses: - A redesignation to a National Historic Park System unit could lead to increased tourism, potentially boosting the local economy. Local businesses might benefit from increased visitor numbers, leading to more significant economic opportunities and job creation.
Historical and Cultural Organizations: - Historical societies and cultural preservation groups might find an ally in the bill, as it supports the preservation and recognition of historically significant sites. They may receive more significant support for their educational and advocacy efforts.
Taxpayers and Government Entities: - From a governmental standpoint, without clearly outlined financial responsibilities, there could be concerns over taxpayer money allocation and ensuring spending efficiency. The absence of a robust framework for public involvement might also challenge perceived transparency and accountability.
Overall, while the bill seeks to recognize and protect a site of historical importance, addressing the outlined issues could advance the bill’s objectives and ensure it serves the public's best interests efficiently and effectively.
Issues
The lack of a specified budget or cost implications for the Fort Pillow Special Resource Study in Section 3 could lead to potential overspending or unaccounted expenses, which may be a significant concern for taxpayers and fiscal responsibility.
Section 3 does not include a timeline for the completion of the special resource study, resulting in a potential lack of accountability and the possibility of indefinite delays.
The criteria for evaluating Fort Pillow Historic State Park's national significance are not clearly defined in Section 3, leading to possible ambiguity in decision-making and inconsistencies in the designation process.
Section 3 lacks specific language on what would make the designation of the park as a National Historic Park System unit suitable or feasible, which could lead to subjective interpretations and decision-making.
There is no mention of public or stakeholder involvement in the special resource study in Section 3, which raises concerns about transparency and inclusiveness in the decision-making process.
The short title in Section 1 does not provide details on the specifics or implementation of the Act, which limits the ability to identify potential issues related to spending, favoritism, or accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act can be referred to as the "Fort Pillow National Battlefield Park Study Act".
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress acknowledges that Fort Pillow, originally built by Confederate forces, was the site of a brutal massacre during the Civil War, which galvanized the United States Colored Troops. It became a significant rallying point, contributing to the Union's success, and today, the site is a historical state park that the bill suggests should be elevated to a National Battlefield Park due to its historical significance.
3. Fort Pillow Special Resource Study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Interior is tasked with conducting a special study of Fort Pillow Historic State Park in Tennessee to assess its national importance and examine whether it could become part of the National Historic Park System.