Overview

Title

To amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act to allow poultry processing facilities to perform regular slaughter and custom exempt at the same facility.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 9251 wants to let places that prepare chickens for sale also prepare chickens people bring from home, as long as the home-brought chickens are kept separate, stay clean, and have a special label saying they can't be sold.

Summary AI

H. R. 9251 aims to amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act, allowing poultry processing facilities to conduct both regular slaughter and custom exempt slaughter at the same location. The bill proposes that a facility can perform custom slaughter for owners who bring their poultry, and the processed poultry will be labeled "Not for Sale" and can be used only by the owner’s household and guests. It also includes requirements that these custom operations at official establishments must separate custom-processed poultry from those intended for sale and maintain sanitary conditions.

Published

2024-08-02
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-08-02
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9251ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
436
Pages:
3
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 140
Verbs: 42
Adjectives: 29
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 8
Entities: 17

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.81
Average Sentence Length:
31.14
Token Entropy:
4.78
Readability (ARI):
20.63

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill in question, titled the "Increasing Small-Scale Poultry Processing Opportunities Act," aims to amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act. Its primary focus is to permit poultry processing facilities to conduct both regular slaughter and custom-exempt slaughter activities within the same facility. The custom-exempt slaughtering refers to processing poultry for the owner's personal use, allowing these products to be transported in commerce as long as they are clearly marked "Not for Sale." This legislation seeks to streamline operations for small-scale poultry processors by reducing regulatory burdens.

Significant Issues

Several concerns arise from the proposed amendments. A key issue is the lack of clarity regarding the regulations the Secretary may promulgate, creating potential for inconsistent enforcement across facilities. This vagueness could lead to confusion among facility operators about compliance requirements.

Additionally, the term "official establishment" is not explicitly defined within this section, potentially leading to misunderstandings about which facilities qualify for exemptions. This ambiguity might exclude certain processors inadvertently or result in improper application of exemptions.

The complex legal language used to describe the exemption process for custom slaughter operations poses difficulties for comprehension. Non-experts may struggle to understand the bill's provisions, which could lead to misinterpretation and improper implementation of the law.

There is also a lack of specificity regarding the sanitary standards required for facilities engaged in custom-exempt operations. Without clear criteria, establishments may adhere to differing standards, raising concerns about public health and safety.

Broad Public Impact

This bill could significantly impact both the poultry processing industry and consumers. For the general public, the flexibility offered to small-scale processors might increase the availability of locally processed poultry products, potentially lowering costs or expanding choices in rural or underserved areas.

However, the public might also face safety concerns if the sanitary conditions of these operations are not consistently enforced or if products are mishandled due to unclear guidelines. Consumers rely on safety standards to ensure the poultry they consume does not pose health risks, and any lapses could undermine public trust.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For small-scale poultry processors, the bill presents an opportunity to increase efficiency and reduce operational costs by consolidating activities within a single facility. This could enable them to compete more effectively with larger industrial processors.

On the other hand, larger poultry processing companies might view the bill as introducing unfair competition, as smaller operators may benefit from reduced inspection costs while still accessing certain commerce avenues. Such a perception could spur calls for further regulatory revisions or challenges.

Regulatory bodies and inspectors may face additional challenges in ensuring compliance with the new rules, particularly given the current lack of clarity in the bill's provisions. Enforcement might require more resources or adjustments to existing oversight frameworks.

Overall, while the bill seeks to aid small producers by reducing regulatory burdens, its success will depend heavily on clear definitions and consistent enforcement of standards, balancing increased agricultural freedom with consumer safety.

Issues

  • The scope of regulations that the Secretary may promulgate is not clearly defined, leaving room for potential inconsistency in enforcement. This lack of clarity could have significant legal implications and result in uneven application of the law across different facilities. (Section 2)

  • The term 'official establishment' is not defined in this section, which could lead to confusion about which facilities are eligible for exemption. Misunderstanding this term could have political and legal ramifications as it might affect which processors can benefit from the bill. (Section 2)

  • The language used to describe the exemption process for custom slaughter operations is complex and may be difficult for readers to understand. This complexity might affect the general public's ability to fully grasp the implications of the bill and could lead to legal challenges. (Section 2)

  • The provision does not specify the criteria for maintaining and operating an establishment in a 'sanitary manner', which could lead to uneven standards. This could have health and safety implications, raising ethical concerns. (Section 2)

  • The clause outlining the conditions for exemptions contains multiple requirements within a single sentence, increasing the risk of misinterpretation. Such misinterpretation could lead to legal disputes or inconsistent application of the law. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section states that the official name of this law is the “Increasing Small-Scale Poultry Processing Opportunities Act”.

2. Allowance of custom-exempt and regular slaughter for poultry processors Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the law to allow poultry processors to perform custom-exempt and regular slaughter without needing inspection if the poultry products are for personal use, not for sale, and marked accordingly. It requires that custom-processed poultry at official establishments be separated from those meant for sale and that operations are conducted hygienically.