Overview
Title
To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide States the authority to limit blocking highway-rail grade crossings, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9248 wants to give states the power to make rules about how long trains can stop and block roads, so cars don't get stuck waiting too long. It also tries to make sure the big central rules don't mess with the little rules each state wants to make.
Summary AI
H. R. 9248, known as the "Railroad Responsibility Act of 2024," is a proposed law that aims to give states more power to control how long trains can block highway-rail grade crossings. It amends Title 49 of the United States Code to ensure that states can create their own laws or regulations to limit the time a railroad can stop on a crossing. This bill clarifies that such state regulations would not be overridden by federal law.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The legislation, titled the "Railroad Responsibility Act of 2024," seeks to amend title 49 of the United States Code to provide states with the authority to regulate the duration trains can block highway-rail grade crossings. This means each state, along with the District of Columbia, would be able to establish their own rules and regulations regarding how long a train can impede traffic at these intersections.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues arises from the potential conflict between state and federal jurisdiction. While the bill states that federal law does not preempt state laws concerning the blocking of railway crossings, the inclusion of language like "notwithstanding any other provision of law" may lead to confusion and inconsistent enforcement across different jurisdictions.
Another issue is the complexity of legal terminology used in the bill. Terms such as "preempt" may not be easily understood by individuals without a legal background, potentially leading to misunderstandings about the law's implementation.
Additionally, the bill does not establish specific guidelines regarding the acceptable duration for blocking crossings. This omission could result in a patchwork of regulations varying from state to state, leading to uneven enforcement and potential frustration for both rail companies and the public.
Lastly, the definition of "State" includes the District of Columbia but is ambiguous about whether U.S. territories are covered, leading to uncertainty regarding the law's applicability in those regions.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the bill could result in less frequent and shorter blockages at railway crossings, facilitating smoother vehicular traffic and potentially reducing traffic congestion and delays. Commuters and emergency services could benefit from more predictable travel times.
However, the lack of uniformity due to the diverse state regulations may cause confusion, especially for individuals and businesses that operate across state lines, potentially leading to challenges in compliance and navigation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
1. States and Local Governments: States may welcome the ability to tailor regulations to address local concerns. However, they might face challenges in balancing local needs with overarching federal regulations, and the varying rules among neighboring states could complicate interstate commerce and transportation planning.
2. Railroad Companies: These companies might experience operational challenges complying with potentially 51 different sets of regulations (including the District of Columbia). The lack of clear, unified guidelines could lead to logistical complexities and increased costs.
3. Residents and Commuters: Individuals living in areas frequently affected by blocked crossings might see improved traffic conditions. However, prolonged periods of regulatory adjustment and potential discrepancies between different states' rules could cause temporary confusion.
4. Emergency Services: These entities stand to benefit significantly from this bill, as reduced blockages at rail crossings can facilitate quicker response times during emergencies, improving public safety outcomes.
Overall, while the bill aims to empower states to address local traffic issues more effectively, its current language and lack of specific guidelines pose several challenges that need careful consideration to avoid complications in its legislative and practical execution.
Issues
The potential conflict between state authority and federal jurisdiction outlined in Section 2 may lead to confusion due to conflicting language that states the title does not preempt state laws but also uses 'notwithstanding any other provision of law', which can impact enforcement and legal clarity.
The complexity of language in Section 2, such as the term 'preempt', poses a challenge for laypersons to fully understand the legal implications of the bill, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations.
Section 2 lacks specific criteria or guidelines about how long a railroad carrier may block a highway-rail grade crossing. This could result in diverse interpretations and uneven enforcement across states, affecting the uniformity of regulations.
The definition of 'State' in Section 2, which includes the District of Columbia, does not clearly address whether territories are included or excluded. This ambiguity may create uncertainty regarding the applicability of the law in U.S. territories.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides a short title for the legislation, officially naming it the “Railroad Responsibility Act of 2024.”
2. State authority to limit blocking highway-Rail grade crossings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows states to make their own rules about how long trains can block road crossings. It specifically mentions that federal law does not stop states, including the District of Columbia, from creating these rules.