Overview
Title
To transfer and limit Executive Branch authority to suspend or restrict the entry of a class of aliens.
ELI5 AI
The NO BAN Act is a bill that wants to make sure rules about who can visit the United States are fair and not based on where someone is from or their religion. It says any new rules should really help keep people safe and the government has to tell Congress about them.
Summary AI
H.R. 9244, titled the "National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act" or the "NO BAN Act," is designed to limit the Executive Branch’s power to restrict or suspend the entry of certain groups of nonimmigrants into the United States. The bill revises existing immigration laws to ensure that decisions on visa and entry refusals cannot be based on religion or nationality, except when legally required. It also mandates that any suspension or restriction on entry should address specific threats, be narrowly tailored, and include considerations for humanitarian waivers. Furthermore, it requires the government to inform Congress of such decisions and allows affected individuals to seek judicial review.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
H.R. 9244, known as the "National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act" or the "NO BAN Act," proposes changes to the authority of the Executive Branch concerning immigration. The bill aims to expand nondiscrimination provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifically targeting actions based on national origin, religion, or similar criteria. It seeks to limit the President's power to ban or restrict entry of non-citizens, requiring prior consultation with Congress and evidence-based justification for such actions. Additionally, the bill mandates more frequent reports about visa and immigration-related decisions to ensure transparency and accountability.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major issue is the discretionary power retained by the President for suspending or restricting entry based on "specific and credible facts." The ambiguity in this language could lead to inconsistent applications, creating room for potential legal challenges. Further complicating matters is the requirement for congressional consultation and reporting, which lacks clarity on what constitutes sufficient evidence or consultation, possibly leading to disputes over executive accountability.
Another issue is the burden of frequent reporting, mandated every 30 days, which could strain administrative resources and increase costs, raising questions about government efficiency.
Lastly, while the bill emphasizes public transparency, there's concern over the sensitivity of information disclosed publicly. Releasing specific visa-related data and governmental decision-making processes could affect national security and international relations.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill primarily aims to protect nonimmigrants from discrimination based on national origin and other factors, mirroring broader societal values of fairness and equality. By imposing limits on the Executive Branch's ability to enforce immigration bans, it aligns with concerns about unchecked governmental power. However, the complexity of the bill’s legal language might make it challenging for the general public to fully grasp its implications, possibly leading to misunderstandings about its effects on national security and immigration policy.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
For immigrant communities, particularly those from countries previously affected by travel bans, the bill represents a significant step towards safeguarding their rights and promoting equality. It provides greater assurance that any restrictions will require a strong justification, grounded in legitimate security concerns, and will be subject to oversight and potential judicial review.
Humanitarian organizations and advocates for immigrant rights may view the bill favorably, as it promotes due process and transparency in immigration decisions, potentially leading to more positive outcomes for refugees and asylum seekers.
Negative Impacts
On the other hand, the bill could present challenges for government agencies like the Department of Homeland Security, which would be tasked with increased administrative responsibilities to meet the reporting and consultation requirements. Additionally, airlines may face heightened scrutiny and potential penalties related to immigration enforcement, which could disrupt travel and impact their operations.
Lastly, members of Congress will have an expanded role in immigration oversight, which could be seen as burdensome given the regular consultations and detailed reporting required, potentially detracting from other legislative responsibilities.
In conclusion, while the NO BAN Act aims to reinforce antidiscrimination measures and checks on executive power, it also presents challenges related to administrative efficiency, transparency, and national security considerations.
Issues
Section 3 - Transfer and limitations on authority to suspend or restrict the entry of a class of aliens: This section gives significant discretionary power to the President to suspend or restrict entry based on 'specific and credible facts.' The subjectivity of this terminology could lead to inconsistent applications, potentially resulting in legal challenges and public controversy.
Section 4 - Visa Applicants report: The requirement to submit frequent reports (every 30 days) could lead to administrative burdens and increased costs, raising concerns about government efficiency and resource allocation.
Section 2 - Expansion of nondiscrimination provision: The complexity and length of the legal language may make it difficult for non-experts to understand the amendment, potentially leading to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of its implications.
Section 3 - Judicial review provision: The lack of clear guidelines on who is considered 'harmed' and under what circumstances could result in variable legal interpretations, leading to challenges on the fairness and accessibility of seeking judicial relief.
Section 3 - Requirement for congressional consultation and evidence: The lack of clarity on what constitutes sufficient 'consultation' and 'evidence' for Congress could generate debates over executive accountability and transparency.
Section 4 - Public availability of reports: While transparency is generally positive, concerns may arise regarding the sensitivity of information disclosed in public reports, potentially impacting national security or diplomatic relations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act provides its short title, stating that it may be referred to as the “National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act” or simply the “NO BAN Act.”
2. Expansion of nondiscrimination provision Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses changes to the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifically changing how discrimination is addressed. It removes certain exceptions to the nondiscrimination rule and expands protection to include religion and additional visa-related processes, with some exceptions for when the law requires considering these factors.
3. Transfer and limitations on authority to suspend or restrict the entry of a class of aliens Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow the President, with input from the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, to temporarily stop or limit certain groups of people from entering the U.S. for security or safety reasons. However, they must inform Congress and follow specific rules, including considering exceptions for humanitarian reasons and ensuring a transparent process.
4. Visa Applicants report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of State, along with other federal agencies, to submit reports to Congress detailing the impact of certain presidential proclamations and executive orders related to visa applications. These reports, which must include information about visa applications, approvals, refusals, waivers, and refugees, have to be made public online. Additionally, additional reports must be submitted if the President uses authority to restrict visas, and the restriction will end if the report isn't submitted on time.