Overview

Title

To establish the Interagency Group on Large-Scale Carbon Management in the National Science and Technology Council and a Federal Carbon Removal Initiative, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill is like a big plan to help the Earth by cleaning up the air, using special groups to figure out how to catch and store the bad stuff we breathe out, called carbon dioxide, in different ways like using the ocean or special machines. It wants all these helpers to work together and check how much money they need every year so they don't waste any.

Summary AI

The Removing Emissions to Mend Our Vulnerable Earth Act of 2024 establishes an Interagency Group on Large-Scale Carbon Management within the National Science and Technology Council. This group is tasked with developing a strategic plan for federal research, development, and demonstration of various carbon dioxide removal technologies. It will oversee multiple working groups focusing on ocean, terrestrial, geological, and technological methods of capturing and storing carbon dioxide. Additionally, the bill mandates an annual budget review to ensure coordinated financial planning for these initiatives across different federal agencies.

Published

2024-07-30
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-30
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9212ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
2,201
Pages:
14
Sentences:
48

Language

Nouns: 705
Verbs: 137
Adjectives: 64
Adverbs: 18
Numbers: 81
Entities: 141

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.58
Average Sentence Length:
45.85
Token Entropy:
4.82
Readability (ARI):
26.44

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 9212, also known as the “Removing Emissions to Mend Our Vulnerable Earth Act of 2024” or the “REMOVE Act of 2024,” aims to establish an interagency effort focused on large-scale carbon management within the National Science and Technology Council. The bill proposes creating an Interagency Group to oversee and coordinate federal research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) efforts for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and storage technologies. The initiative covers various approaches such as direct air capture, forest restoration, soil management, and ocean-based methods. Linked working groups will focus on specific areas like oceans, terrestrial ecosystems, geological environments, and technological advancements.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill presents several potential issues and challenges:

  1. Ambiguity in Definitions: The definition of "carbon dioxide removal" could lead to unintended support for controversial or unproven technologies, such as geoengineering techniques, without clear parameters.

  2. Complex Structure: The formation of the Interagency Group and its multiple working groups involves numerous federal departments and agencies. This complexity might result in bureaucratic inefficiencies, slow decision-making, and potential conflicts of interest due to overlapping roles.

  3. Selection Bias: The selection process for working group members is based heavily on current federal employees, which could result in institutional biases rather than selecting the most qualified individuals from a broader pool.

  4. Potential for Wasteful Spending: Setting up and maintaining numerous working groups, along with the triennial evaluations, could lead to inefficiencies without clear performance metrics or defined outcomes.

  5. Vague Language: The duties and objectives outlined in the bill rely on terms like "cost-effective", "accurate monitoring", and "social impacts", which are broad and open to interpretation, potentially leading to inconsistent implementation of the bill’s goals.

  6. Budgetary Challenges: The annual budget crosscut review highlights the difficulty of coordinating budgets across different federal agencies, considering their varying priorities and constraints.

Impact on Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

The passage of H.R. 9212 would signify a substantial federal commitment to addressing climate change through carbon management strategies. Public perception could be mixed, as the embrace of emerging technologies for carbon removal might raise optimism about addressing environmental challenges. However, concerns could also arise from the potential risks associated with unproven methods and the extensive federal involvement required.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • Environmental Organizations: Groups advocating for climate action might support the structured approach toward carbon removal and the research resources allocated to developing effective solutions.

  • Research Institutions: Universities and scientific organizations could benefit from increased funding and collaboration opportunities with federal agencies involved in carbon removal technologies.

  • Industries Developing Carbon Technologies: Companies working on innovative carbon capture and storage technologies might see a surge in support and potential market opportunities resulting from federally coordinated efforts.

Negative Impacts:

  • Federal Agencies: Agencies involved in multiple working groups could face operational challenges due to overlapping responsibilities and the demands of interagency coordination.

  • Communities Concerned About Geoengineering: Some stakeholders might be apprehensive about potential geoengineering methods included in the bill’s broad definitions, fearing ecological and social risks.

In summary, while the REMOVE Act of 2024 proposes a comprehensive federal effort to tackle carbon emissions, the issues discussed signal the need for cautious and strategic implementation to ensure that the objectives are met effectively without causing inadvertent consequences.

Issues

  • The broad and potentially ambiguous definition of 'carbon dioxide removal' in Section 2(a) could encompass controversial technologies such as geoengineering. This might lead to unintended consequences or support for unproven methods, necessitating further specification to mitigate risks.

  • The complex structure and composition of the Interagency Group on Large-Scale Carbon Management and its working groups in Section 2(b) and 2(d) may lead to inefficiencies due to overlapping roles and bureaucratic challenges, resulting in slower decision-making and potential conflicts of interest.

  • The selection process for working group members in Section 2(d) heavily relies on employees from specific departments, which could predispose selections to institutional biases rather than prioritizing the most qualified individuals, possibly affecting the overall effectiveness and neutrality of the groups.

  • There is a risk of wasteful spending highlighted in Section 2(b) and 2(d) due to the establishment of numerous working groups and the requirement for ongoing evaluations and modifications every three years without clear performance metrics or defined outcomes.

  • The language in Section 2 outlining the duties of the Interagency Group, particularly regarding terms like 'cost-effective', 'accurate monitoring', and 'social impacts', is broad and open to interpretation, potentially leading to varied implementation practices that may not align with intended outcomes.

  • The annual budget crosscut review in Section 2(e) indicates a need for integration across federal departments and agencies. This could be challenging due to differing priorities and budget constraints, potentially impacting the effectiveness of the Carbon Removal Initiative.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act states that the law may be officially called the “Removing Emissions to Mend Our Vulnerable Earth Act of 2024” or simply the “REMOVE Act of 2024”.

2. Interagency Group on Large-Scale Carbon Management and Federal Carbon Removal Initiative Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the Interagency Group on Large-Scale Carbon Management within the National Science and Technology Council to plan and coordinate federal efforts in carbon dioxide removal and storage, including forming working groups around different focus areas like oceans, terrestrial, geological, and technological solutions. The group will oversee these initiatives, identify suitable technologies, and ensure budget alignment across federal agencies to support research, development, and demonstration projects.