Overview
Title
To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to address the economic and workforce impacts of substance use disorder.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 9209 is a plan to help people find jobs and support who are affected by drug problems. It gives money to groups to work together and help these people learn skills and get better jobs, with more money promised every year until 2030.
Summary AI
H. R. 9209 aims to change the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to help tackle the effects of substance use disorder on jobs and the economy. The bill proposes a pilot program that provides grants to states and local boards to create partnerships with various organizations. These partnerships will deliver services like training and support for individuals affected by or interested in working in fields related to substance use disorder. The bill also allocates funding for these programs, starting with $25 million in 2025 and increasing each year up to 2030.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill H.R. 9209, titled the “Workforce Opportunities for Communities in Recovery Act,” seeks to amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to address the acute economic and workforce challenges associated with substance use disorders. Through this bill, grants would be issued by the Secretary of Labor to support state and local entities in partnering with organizations to help individuals affected by substance use disorders gain employment and maintain their recovery.
Summary of the Bill
At its core, the bill establishes a pilot program designed to distribute grants to eligible entities that can form partnerships with organizations. These partnerships are tasked with addressing the workforce impacts associated with substance use disorders. The types of entities eligible for these grants range from educational institutions to community organizations and legal services. The funds would support services such as job training, supportive services, and collaboration with employers to foster employment opportunities for affected individuals.
The bill also outlines the allocation of funds for this program over several years, starting at $25 million in fiscal year 2025 and increasing annually to $37.5 million by fiscal year 2030.
Significant Issues
One of the prominent issues with the bill concerns the allocation of funds, which permits up to 5% of funds for the administrative costs by the Secretary and up to 10% for participating partnerships. This could divert a considerable portion of the financial resources away from core services meant for individuals impacted by substance use disorders. Furthermore, the criteria for "equitable distribution" of grants lack clarity, raising concerns about whether funds would be fairly distributed across different areas.
There is also some vagueness in the bill regarding which organizations can participate, especially with the term “another organization” left open to interpretation by eligible entities. This lack of specificity could lead to favoritism or negligent allocation of partnerships toward less qualified entities.
The bill requires periodic independent evaluations for assessing its impact. However, the nature of these evaluations, particularly if they involve complex methodologies such as experimental designs with random assignments, might lead to high costs, further drawing funds away from the essential service provisions.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact:
If successfully implemented, this bill could positively impact communities by providing employment opportunities and supporting those who are recovering from substance use disorders. It emphasizes creating meaningful pathways to employment, which could aid in the reintegration of affected individuals into the workforce, thus potentially reducing dependency on public social services.
Positive Impact on Specific Stakeholders:
Communities heavily affected by substance use disorders may benefit significantly from the structured support provided by these grants. Workers and employers in areas with high rates of substance use might see improved economic conditions and workforce participation. Educational providers and treatment organizations stand to gain additional support and resources to expand their impact.
Negative Impact on Specific Stakeholders:
Conversely, ambiguity regarding the allocation and use of granted funds could lead to inefficiencies or misdirected resources. Regions with less compelling but still significant needs might find themselves disadvantaged if grant distribution does not effectively consider all areas affected by substance use disorders equitably. Smaller organizations might struggle to compete with larger ones for grants, despite being equally invested in community recovery efforts.
Administrative Concerns:
The substantial portion of funds potentially directed towards administrative costs at both the federal and partnership levels might lead to criticism about resource utilization priorities. This could limit the reach and effectiveness of services to individuals needing direct support, potentially stalling recovery and employment efforts.
Overall, while the bill aims to address critical issues tied to substance use disorders, the effectiveness of its implementation will largely depend on addressing these outlined challenges and ensuring equitable, efficient distribution and use of funds.
Financial Assessment
The proposed bill, H. R. 9209, outlines financial allocations to address the economic and workforce impacts of substance use disorder through amendments to the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. It establishes a pilot program providing grants to develop partnerships that deliver supportive and training services. The financial provisions are critical to understanding the potential effectiveness and implications of these amendments.
Financial Allocations
The bill authorizes a series of increasing financial appropriations over several fiscal years for the proposed initiatives:
- $25 million for fiscal year 2025,
- $27.5 million for fiscal year 2026,
- $30 million for fiscal year 2027,
- $32.5 million for fiscal year 2028,
- $35 million for fiscal year 2029,
- $37.5 million for fiscal year 2030.
These appropriations are meant to fund the grants that support workforce development in sectors impacted by substance use disorders.
Administrative Costs
A significant issue highlighted is the percentage of funds allocated to administrative costs. Specifically, the Secretary may use up to 5% of funds for administrative purposes, and participating partnerships can allocate up to 10% for their administrative costs. The concern is that this could divert substantial funds from direct services to administrative overhead, potentially limiting the resources available for those directly affected by substance use disorders.
Supportive Services Cap
The bill sets a cap of 10% of the funds for supportive services by participating partnerships. This cap might constrain the ability to provide essential support services for program participants, possibly affecting long-term recovery outcomes. The restricted allocation for these crucial services could limit the program’s intent to offer comprehensive support to individuals transitioning through various stages of recovery and employment.
Equitable Distribution and Evaluation Costs
The bill mandates "equitable distribution" of the grants, but lacks explicit criteria, raising concerns about potential inconsistencies in fund allocation across different regions. This could lead to disparities in program effectiveness depending on geographical and demographic contexts.
Additionally, the provision for independent evaluations using expensive methodologies, such as random assignment, could impose high costs. These costs might subtract from the funds available for direct services, limiting the resources intended for participants' recovery and workforce reintegration.
Conclusion
Overall, while H. R. 9209 aims to leverage significant funds to address the impacts of substance use disorder on the workforce, careful scrutiny of financial allocations is necessary. Ensuring that a larger proportion of the funds are directed towards direct services rather than administrative and evaluation costs will be crucial. Clear guidelines on equitable distribution are also critical to ensure that the appropriations lead to effective and consistent program outcomes across different regions and populations.
Issues
The allocation of funds allows for up to 5% for administrative costs by the Secretary and up to 10% for such costs by participating partnerships (Section 2). This could be considered excessive, potentially diverting funds away from essential services intended for those affected by substance use disorder.
The definition of "Another organization, as determined appropriate by the eligible entity" within "Participating Partnership" is vague (Section 2). This lack of specificity could lead to favoritism or misuse, whereby funds or partnerships could be directed towards less qualified entities.
The criteria for "equitable distribution" of grants are not clearly defined (Section 2). This may lead to subjective interpretations and inconsistencies in ensuring fair distribution of grants across different regions.
There is a provision for periodic independent evaluations, and these might incur high costs, particularly if they require experimental designs using random assignments (Section 2). The financial implications of this requirement could divert substantial resources from direct program service delivery.
The language used in section (4)(C)(i) concerning employer engagement is complex (Section 2). This complexity may render implementation or understanding challenging without further guidance or clarification, potentially impacting the program effectiveness.
Conforming amendments involve changes such as replacing "this section" with specific references like "this paragraph" (Section 4). These amendments could lead to confusion if the document structure is not clear or if there are future numbering changes, potentially obscuring the legislative intent or interpretation.
The provision for up to 10% of funds for supportive services by participating partnerships might limit necessary support for program participants (Section 2). This cap could restrict vital services needed to maintain long-term recovery and successful program participation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act is called the "Short title," and it specifies that the official name of the act is the “Workforce Opportunities for Communities in Recovery Act.”
2. Grants for addressing the economic and workforce impacts of substance use disorder Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill outlines a pilot program for the Secretary to provide grants to eligible organizations, which will work in partnerships to address the economic and workforce challenges caused by substance use disorders. These partnerships will deliver various services, including job training, support services, and employer engagement, to help affected individuals gain employment and maintain recovery, with strict rules on how grant money can be spent and requirements for performance reporting and evaluation.
3. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to authorize funding for substance use crisis grants, starting at $25 million for the fiscal year 2025 and increasing incrementally to $37.5 million by the fiscal year 2030.
Money References
- Section 172 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3227) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following: “(e) Substance use crisis grants.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 170(e)— “(1) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; “(2) $27,500,000 for fiscal year 2026; “(3) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; “(4) $32,500,000 for fiscal year 2028; “(5) $35,000,000 for fiscal year 2029; and “(6) $37,500,000 for fiscal year 2030.”. ---
4. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to Section 170 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act involve two key changes: First, it updates wording in subsection (b)(1)(C) by replacing “this section” with “this paragraph.” Second, it changes subsection (d)(4) by replacing “this section” with “subsection (b)(1)(B),” effectively clarifying the references within the legal text.