Overview

Title

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include notification and automatic enrollment procedures for borrowers who are delinquent on loans, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9192 is a plan to make it easier for people who borrowed money for school to pay it back. It tries to automatically help those having trouble by using their income information to find a payment plan they can afford, but they need to know they can say no to sharing this information if they want.

Summary AI

H.R. 9192, known as the “Streamlining Income-driven, Manageable Payments on Loans for Education Act” or the “SIMPLE Act,” proposes amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965. The bill aims to help student loan borrowers who are delinquent or rehabilitating defaulted loans by implementing procedures for automatic enrollment into manageable repayment plans. It allows the Secretary of Education to access income details of borrowers to facilitate this process, while giving borrowers options to update or opt out of using such income information for repayment calculations. These changes aim to make the repayment process more straightforward and to reduce the financial burden on student loan borrowers.

Published

2024-07-30
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-30
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9192ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
3,928
Pages:
21
Sentences:
47

Language

Nouns: 1,019
Verbs: 313
Adjectives: 234
Adverbs: 36
Numbers: 132
Entities: 99

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.05
Average Sentence Length:
83.57
Token Entropy:
4.99
Readability (ARI):
42.89

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the “Streamlining Income-driven, Manageable Payments on Loans for Education Act” or “SIMPLE Act,” seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965. The key purpose of this bill is to introduce more structured notification and automatic enrollment processes for student loan borrowers who have become delinquent on their repayments or are in the process of rehabilitating defaulted loans. The bill proposes the use of income data from tax returns to assist in automatically enrolling these borrowers into appropriate repayment plans. These plans aim to offer manageable payment options based on the borrower's income and family size. The implementation of these procedures is scheduled to begin in 2026.

Summary of Significant Issues

The primary issues associated with the bill center on the complexity of its language, privacy concerns, and the timeline for implementation. The legal and technical jargon used in the bill may pose challenges for borrowers trying to understand the specifics of their rights and obligations concerning loan repayment. This lack of clarity can potentially leave borrowers confused or misinformed about their eligibility and obligations.

Additionally, the bill's reliance on borrowing income information from tax returns raises privacy concerns. While there are provisions for secure data transfers, the possibility of sensitive financial information being shared between governmental bodies could make borrowers uneasy about how their personal data is used and protected.

Furthermore, the delayed implementation until 2026 may be criticized for not providing immediate relief to borrowers currently struggling with loan payments. The need for timely intervention in difficult financial situations is crucial and postponing assistance may not address the urgent needs of borrowers.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill represents an effort to make student loan repayments more manageable for borrowers, particularly those facing delinquency. By proposing to automatically enroll borrowers into income-driven repayment plans, the bill could ease financial burdens by aligning monthly payments more closely with borrowers' actual financial situations. However, the impact of these benefits may be tempered by the aforementioned complexities and delays.

For students and graduates with outstanding loans, the change may potentially provide more structure and clarity in managing debt. Nevertheless, the success of this initiative heavily relies on clear communication and guidance from relevant agencies to ensure borrowers understand and can effectively navigate their options.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Borrowers: For borrowers, especially those struggling with financial challenges, the bill is aimed at delivering relief through automatic enrollment in more suitable repayment plans. This could mean reduced monthly payments, thus improving financial flexibility. However, borrowers need to be aware of their options to opt-out of data sharing if they prefer, and they will need clear guidance to understand the different repayment plans available.

Loan Servicers: The responsibility of implementing these new processes will likely fall on loan servicers, who will need to adjust their systems to accommodate automatic enrollments and to ensure secure handling of borrowers' financial data from tax returns. This could require significant changes in their operations and technological capabilities.

Government Agencies: Various government bodies will need to ensure the secure and efficient transfer of sensitive information. They must also establish robust systems to protect privacy while facilitating seamless communication of updated income-driven payment plans to borrowers.

In summary, while the bill proposes meaningful mechanisms for addressing student loan repayment challenges, it will require careful communication and implementation strategies to fully realize its benefits. Addressing the issues related to complexity, privacy, and delayed implementation will be key to its success.

Financial Assessment

The "Streamlining Income-driven, Manageable Payments on Loans for Education Act" or the "SIMPLE Act" includes several financial references related to the management and repayment of student loans. Although the bill does not directly allocate funds or approve specific spending, it addresses how financial elements like borrowers' income and monthly payments impact student loan repayment processes. Below is a detailed commentary on the financial aspects of the bill:

Monthly Payment Calculations

The bill includes specific provisions regarding the amount of monthly payments for student loans. It discusses how these payments are determined based on the borrower's income and family size. This highlights the bill's focus on making payments more manageable for borrowers by using income-driven repayment plans. It aims to ease the financial burden on borrowers by calculating payments that reflect their financial situation.

Automatic Enrollment and Privacy Concerns

Financial processes mentioned in the bill involve the automatic enrollment of delinquent borrowers into repayment plans. While this mechanism intends to streamline payment processes and reduce delinquency rates, it raises potential privacy concerns. Borrowers' income information is accessed from tax returns, which is integral in setting payment amounts but could be a contentious issue for those worried about data privacy. Furthermore, the opt-out feature requires borrowers to take action to prevent the sharing of their financial information, which might not be apparent to all, potentially leading to unintentional data exposure.

Income Information and Borrower Awareness

For borrowers whose adjusted gross income is unavailable, the bill ensures that they will not be obligated to provide additional income information if they are eligible for a payment plan resulting in a zero-dollar payment. However, this approach assumes borrowers are fully aware of such provisions, which might not be the case given the technical nature of the bill's language. This can lead to confusion and possible financial commitments based on limited understanding of their repayment options.

Implementation Timeline

The bill's provisions are slated to take effect in July 2026, affecting the 2026–2027 award year. This delay implies that borrowers will need to manage their loans under current conditions for another couple of years before benefiting from these amendments. This delay could be problematic for borrowers struggling with immediate financial issues, as they must wait for the enacted changes to take effect to see any improvement in their financial situation regarding loan payments.

Clarification of Terms

Terms like "covered loan" and "noncovered loan" are well-defined within the bill. However, understanding these categories' financial implications could be challenging for borrowers without clear guidance. Any financial references associated with these terms need to be easily understood to prevent misunderstandings that could affect borrowers' financial planning and repayment strategy.

Educational Support on Repayment Plans

While the bill aims to offer multiple income-driven repayment plans, the lack of straightforward guidance might overwhelm borrowers unfamiliar with financial terminology and options. Without explicit support or educational material, borrowers could face difficulty in choosing the most financially advantageous repayment plan, leading to potentially higher payment commitments than necessary.

In summary, the financial components of the SIMPLE Act are primarily concerned with easing repayment through calculated payment plans. However, these efforts are accompanied by complexities surrounding privacy, awareness, and the need for immediate assistance, compounded by an implementation timeline extending into the future.

Issues

  • The language of Section 2 regarding notification and automatic enrollment procedures is highly technical and complex, potentially making it difficult for borrowers to understand their rights and obligations. This could lead to borrowers missing critical information about their loans and repayment options.

  • The procedures in Section 2 for disclosing and using borrowers' income information may raise privacy concerns. The bill outlines secure transfers of sensitive financial information between government bodies, which might worry borrowers about data privacy and protection.

  • Section 2 relies on borrowers taking action to opt-out of income information disclosures, which assumes borrowers are fully aware of this right and the potential implications. This could result in unintended data sharing if borrowers overlook this option.

  • Implementation of the bill's amendments is delayed until 2026, as specified in Section 2(c), potentially leaving borrowers without necessary assistance and relief until then. This may draw criticism for not addressing immediate financial struggles faced by borrowers.

  • The clarity of definitions provided in Section 2 for terms like 'covered loan' and 'noncovered loan' should be scrutinized, as misunderstandings about these terms may lead to borrower confusion regarding what loans are affected by these changes.

  • Guidance and support for understanding multiple repayment plans in Section 2 may be insufficient, which could overwhelm borrowers who are unfamiliar with complex financial terminology. Without clear guidance, borrowers may struggle to choose the best repayment plan.

  • The timeline and precise process set forth in Section 2 for switching repayment plans are not clearly outlined, potentially leading to confusion and missteps by borrowers attempting to navigate their repayment options.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it may be referred to as the "Streamlining Income-driven, Manageable Payments on Loans for Education Act" or simply the "SIMPLE Act".

2. Notification and automatic enrollment procedures for borrowers who are delinquent on loans and for borrowers who are rehabilitating defaulted loans Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes procedures for notifying and automatically enrolling borrowers who are behind on student loan payments into more manageable repayment plans. It allows the government to gather income information from tax returns to help place borrowers into plans they are eligible for and explains the requirements for borrowers to opt out or update information to maintain the most suitable repayment options. These changes will be effective starting July 1, 2026.

Money References

  • “(v) The amount of monthly payments for the covered and noncovered loans under the repayment plans for which the borrower is eligible, based on information available to the Secretary, including, if the income information of the borrower is available to the Secretary under subparagraph (A)— “(I) the amount of the monthly payment under each income-driven repayment plan for which the borrower is eligible for the borrower's covered and noncovered loans, based on such income information; and “(II) the income, family size, tax filing status, and tax year information on which each monthly payment is based. “(vi) An explanation that in the case of a borrower for whom adjusted gross income is unavailable— “(I) if the borrower selects to repay the covered loans of such borrower pursuant to an income-driven repayment plan that defines discretionary income in such a manner that an individual not required under section 6012(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to file a return with respect to income taxes imposed by subtitle A of such Code may have a calculated monthly payment greater than $0, the borrower will be required to provide the Secretary with other documentation of income satisfactory to the Secretary, which documentation the Secretary may use to determine an appropriate repayment schedule; and “(II) if the borrower selects to repay such loans pursuant to an income-driven repayment plan that is not described in subclause (I), the borrower will not be required to provide the Secretary with such other documentation of income, and the borrower will have a calculated monthly payment of $0.
  • — (A) BORROWER FOR WHOM ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME IS UNAVAILABLE.—Section 455(e)(8)(A) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(e)(8)(A)) is amended— (i) by striking “and” at the end of clause (ii); (ii) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); (iii) in clause (iv) (as so redesignated), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and (iv) by inserting after clause (ii), the following: “(iii) in the case of a borrower who has selected to repay a covered loan (as defined in subsection (d)(8)) pursuant to an income contingent repayment plan that defines discretionary income in such a manner that the borrower would have a calculated monthly payment equal to $0, not require the borrower to provide the Secretary the information described in clause (i) or (ii), and ensure that the borrower will have a calculated monthly payment of $0; and”. (B) INCLUSION OF COVERED LOANS.—Section 455(e)(8)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(e)(8)(B)) is amended by striking “a loan made under this part” and inserting “a covered loan (as defined in subsection (d)(8))”.