Overview
Title
To establish in the Department of Labor an Older Workers’ Bureau, to establish a data hub and a technical assistance center at the Department of Labor related to employment of older workers and the effect of older employment on retirement security, to establish grant programs related to the employment of older workers, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 9190 is a bill that wants to make a special team called the "Older Workers' Bureau" to help people who are 55 years or older find good jobs and stop age bias, and they plan to spend $10 million a year to do this, but they didn't say when they'll stop spending.
Summary AI
The bill titled "Older Workers’ Bureau Act," introduced as H. R. 9190, aims to establish an Older Workers' Bureau within the Department of Labor to support workers aged 55 and older. It seeks to improve their employment conditions, promote research and policy development, and eliminate barriers like age discrimination. The bill proposes creating a data hub, a technical assistance center, and grant programs to enhance job opportunities and workplace inclusivity for older workers. It authorizes $10 million annually for related research and programs beyond fiscal year 2023.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Older Workers’ Bureau Act" aims to create a new bureau within the Department of Labor to support the employment and welfare of older workers—those aged 55 and older. This bill seeks to establish a data hub, a technical assistance center, and administer grants to improve opportunities and workplace conditions for these workers. It acknowledges challenges faced by older workers, including job insecurity, age discrimination, and economic vulnerabilities exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
General Summary
At its core, this bill proposes establishing an Older Workers' Bureau in the Department of Labor. The purpose of this bureau would be to lead efforts in addressing the challenges older workers experience. The bureau would conduct research, develop supportive policies, and work with other federal agencies. To support these efforts, the bill would initiate grant programs designed to combat ageism, improve work opportunities, and create inclusive workplaces for older employees.
Summary of Significant Issues
A major issue identified is potential duplication of efforts. Given that other government agencies may already be working on similar issues, there is a risk of overlap, leading to inefficient use of resources. Further, the bill's language around staffing and coordination is quite open-ended. This could lead to unchecked staffing or redundant research initiatives without clear guidelines or budgetary constraints.
Another significant issue concerns the clarity and transparency in allocating research grants. The provisions in the bill do not specify the funding amounts clearly or establish a framework for measuring the effectiveness of the grants. This lack of specificity might undermine the transparency in how the resources are distributed and utilized.
The bill's provision for annual funding authorization of $10,000,000 lacks a defined endpoint, which may lead to indefinite and potentially unwarranted government spending.
Public Impact
Broadly, the bill's establishment of an Older Workers’ Bureau holds the potential for both positive and negative impacts on the public. On the positive side, it could spotlight critical issues facing an aging workforce, thereby promoting inclusive labor policies and safeguarding against ageism in employment. On the flip side, if resources aren't managed effectively, it could lead to wasteful spending with minimal tangible outcomes for the targeted demographic.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Older workers stand to benefit the most if this bill is implemented effectively, as it aims to bolster their employment prospects and improve their overall work conditions. However, without transparent criteria, some older workers might find navigation through the benefits system confusing or unfair.
Employers, especially in regions currently lacking targeted programs, might gain access to resources and support to foster a more age-diverse workforce. However, this might also mean additional compliance and adaptation costs for employers.
In summary, while the "Older Workers’ Bureau Act" strives to address pertinent issues faced by older workers, its effective implementation and management are crucial to ensure that the intended benefits are realized without fiscal burden or inefficiency. Stakeholders, including workers and employers, await clarity on how the proposed measures will definitively shape the future of the workforce and employment landscape for older individuals.
Financial Assessment
The legislation, known as the "Older Workers' Bureau Act" (H. R. 9190), proposes a series of financial commitments aimed at establishing and maintaining an Older Workers’ Bureau within the Department of Labor. This bureau is tasked with addressing various challenges faced by workers aged 55 and older, including age discrimination and job security issues.
Financial Allocations
The bill authorizes an appropriation of $10 million annually for activities related to sections 5 and 6, beginning in the fiscal year after 2023. This funding is intended to support research grants focusing on the employment challenges faced by older workers and grants to combat structural ageism in the workplace. However, it's notable that the bill does not specify an end date for these appropriations, raising concerns about the potential for indefinite financial commitments without periodic reviews or evaluations.
Issues Related to Financial Provisions
Regarding the proposed budget, there are several concerns:
Indefinite Spending: While the bill authorizes a sizeable annual budget, it lacks a specified end date for these funds. This could lead to continuous spending without periodic reassessment, increasing the risk of inefficiencies or wasteful use of government resources. Without a strict timeline or a sunset provision, the financial accountability of these expenditures could come under scrutiny.
Lack of Specificity in Grant Allocation: The provisions regarding research grants to be administered by the Older Workers' Bureau do not include specific guidelines or criteria for the allocation of these funds. This absence of clear allocation strategies makes it challenging to ensure the funds are used effectively. Without set metrics to evaluate the success or impact of funded research, it's difficult to determine if the funds are achieving the intended outcomes.
Ambiguities in Employment Opportunities: The grant program aimed at combating structural ageism also falls short in terms of specifying criteria for improving employment opportunities for older workers. The lack of detailed effectiveness metrics could result in ambiguous implementation, where the impact of these grants is not adequately measured or verified.
Potential Redundancies: There is a concern that the formation of the Older Workers' Bureau could potentially duplicate existing efforts by other government entities, which may already address similar issues. This overlap might lead to inefficient allocation of financial resources, as funds could be channeled into parallel initiatives without clear differentiation of roles and objectives.
In summary, while the bill demonstrates a commitment to improving the employment conditions of older workers through substantial financial investments, the absence of detailed monetary guidelines and continued oversight mechanisms raises critical questions about the effective use of these funds. Addressing these issues would require more precise budgetary controls, clearer criteria for fund allocation, and regular assessment of outcomes to ensure that the financial commitments made by the bill result in meaningful improvements for older workers.
Issues
The establishment of the Older Workers’ Bureau in Section 4 could lead to potentially duplicative functions if other government agencies already address similar issues related to older workers. This could result in inefficient use of resources.
In Section 4, the mandate to 'employ such staff as the Secretary determines necessary' is vague and lacks budgetary constraints or guidelines, potentially leading to unchecked and unnecessary staffing and associated costs.
Section 4 grants the Director the authority to coordinate Federal research and consult with other agencies without specific guidelines, potentially resulting in inefficiencies and redundancy.
The provisions in Section 5 related to research grants do not specify funding amounts, criteria for grant allocation, or metrics for evaluating research success, raising concerns about transparency and efficient use of funds.
Section 6 on grants to combat structural ageism lacks clarity on the criteria for improving employment opportunities and the effectiveness metrics for the grants, which could lead to ambiguous implementation and outcomes.
The definition of 'older worker' in Section 3 includes subjective conditions like 'wants employment' and 'is available for employment', which could lead to ambiguities in determining eligibility for benefits or programs.
Section 7 authorizes $10,000,000 annually without a specified end date, risking indefinite spending that lacks accountability or detailed purpose for allocated funds, leading to potential public concern over wasteful government spending.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act establishes its title, allowing it to be referred to as the "Older Workers’ Bureau Act."
2. Findings; purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress recognizes several challenges faced by older workers, such as increasing numbers in the workforce, risks of poverty, discrimination, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic; the bill aims to improve job opportunities and conditions for them by proposing the creation of an Older Workers’ Bureau to conduct research and develop supportive policies.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The definitions section of the Act explains key terms used throughout, including "Bureau," which refers to the Older Workers’ Bureau; "Director," meaning the head of the Bureau; "older worker," describing someone at least 55 years old who is working, seeking work, or has tried to get a job in the last year; and "Secretary," referring to the Secretary of Labor.
4. Older Worker’s Bureau Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Older Workers’ Bureau is created in the Department of Labor to support older workers in areas like job training, benefits access, retirement security, and combating age discrimination. The Bureau will conduct research, develop policies, and work with other federal agencies to improve the economic and work conditions of older workers, and will report annually on its activities and recommendations.
5. Research grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary, through the Director, is required to establish a competitive grant program within 180 days of the Bureau becoming operational. This program aims to support research focused on helping older workers by identifying employment barriers, exploring ways to remove them, and considering new policies to assist these workers.
6. Grants to combat structural ageism Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a program where the Secretary, through the Director, will give grants to organizations like employers and nonprofits to help older workers. These grants are intended to fight ageism, enhance job opportunities, and promote diversity in the workplace, with a focus on areas lacking specific training for older workers.
7. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
To fund the activities described in sections 5 and 6, the bill allows for $10,000,000 to be allocated each year starting from the fiscal year 2023.
Money References
- To carry out sections 5 and 6, there is authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2023.