Overview
Title
To codify Internal Revenue Service guidance relating to treatment of certain services and items for chronic conditions as meeting the preventive care deductible safe harbor for purposes of high deductible health plans in connection with health savings accounts.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 919 is a plan to make sure specific health services and supplies for people with long-term illnesses are considered "preventive." This means they can have special insurance help to pay for them without having to pay a lot upfront.
Summary AI
H.R. 919, also known as the “Chronic Disease Flexible Coverage Act,” aims to codify existing IRS guidance regarding certain services and items for chronic conditions. These services and items can be considered preventive care, allowing them to qualify for the deductible safe harbor in high deductible health plans that are paired with health savings accounts. The bill ensures that these guidelines, originally set forth in IRS Notice 2019–45, are given official legislative backing. It does not alter other preventive services rules or guidance by the Secretary regarding section 223(c)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 919, introduced in the House of Representatives, is a legislative proposal known as the "Chronic Disease Flexible Coverage Act." The primary goal of the bill is to incorporate specific guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) into law. This guidance relates to the categorization of certain services and items for chronic conditions as "preventive care." This designation allows these services to qualify for deductible safe harbor purposes within high-deductible health plans linked to health savings accounts, as outlined in IRS Notice 2019–45.
Significant Issues
One of the key issues with this bill is its reliance on IRS Notice 2019-45 without providing further details. This requirement for external knowledge or additional research could pose accessibility challenges for individuals unfamiliar with the specific IRS notice, potentially hindering public understanding.
Additionally, Section 2(a) of the bill uses the phrase "shall have the same force and effect as if included in the enactment of this Act" to assert the legal force of the IRS guidance. Such language could lead to ambiguity in interpreting how this incorporation influences existing or future regulations.
The use of the phrase “No inference” in Section 2(b) embeds legal jargon that can be difficult to decipher without a legal background. This contributes to potential confusion among the general public and complicates the bill's overall clarity and transparency.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill aims to provide greater flexibility in how preventive care for chronic conditions is covered under high-deductible health plans linked to health savings accounts. If enacted, individuals using these plans might experience greater access to necessary care for chronic conditions without additional out-of-pocket costs.
The potential for confusion and misunderstanding arises if individuals and plan administrators are not fully aware of which services are included due to the lack of description within the bill itself. This could impede the optimal use of health savings accounts for eligible medical expenses.
Impact on Stakeholders
Patients with Chronic Conditions: If implemented, this legislation could positively impact those living with chronic conditions by expanding the range of preventive services covered. This could decrease their financial burden and improve access to necessary healthcare interventions.
Health Insurers and Plan Administrators: They would need to update their coverage policies to align with the prescribed IRS guidance. This requires administrative adjustments, which might initially incur certain operational costs. Over time, however, the standardization could streamline benefits management.
Healthcare Providers: Greater clarity on preventive care services could encourage healthcare providers to offer these treatments more frequently, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Policy Makers and Legal Experts: These stakeholders must address any resulting confusion from the legal language and lack of elaboration within the bill to ensure its successful implementation and coverage objectives are met.
In conclusion, while H.R. 919 has the potential to significantly improve access to health care for those with chronic conditions, clarifications and further discussions around its implementation are essential to maximizing its benefits and ensuring ease of understanding and application by all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The lack of elaboration on IRS Notice 2019-45 in Section 2 requires readers to possess prior knowledge or conduct additional research to fully understand the implications of the bill. This could limit accessibility and transparency for the general public, affecting their ability to comprehend the bill's impact.
The phrase 'shall have the same force and effect as if included in the enactment of this Act' in Section 2(a) may lead to ambiguous interpretations regarding its legal weight and applicability, potentially causing confusion and inconsistent application of the law.
The legal jargon used in Section 2(b), specifically 'No inference', assumes familiarity with legal interpretations and prior provisions, which might be difficult for the general public to understand, thereby reducing the bill’s clarity and accessibility.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section referred to as "SECTION 1. Short title" designates the name of the Act, which is the "Chronic Disease Flexible Coverage Act".
2. Services and items for chronic conditions treated as preventive care Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses that certain preventive care services for chronic illnesses, as highlighted in IRS Notice 2019-45, are now considered official and enforceable under the law as if they were originally part of the act. It also clarifies that no assumptions should be made about other regulations related to preventive services beyond what's outlined in this section.