Overview
Title
To reauthorize title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965 in order to improve and encourage innovation in international education, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9170 wants to help schools teach kids about the world and different languages by giving them money to figure out new ways to learn these things. It also wants to make sure schools that need help the most get a chance to participate.
Summary AI
H.R. 9170, known as the “Advancing International and Foreign Language Education Act,” aims to reauthorize title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965. The bill seeks to enhance international education by supporting research, innovation, and the development of global skills in various fields at U.S. educational institutions. It proposes grants for projects to improve language programs and international research, and strengthen partnerships with businesses and nonprofit organizations to prepare students for the global economy. The bill also includes provisions to address challenges faced by minority-serving institutions and community colleges related to international education.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the “Advancing International and Foreign Language Education Act,” aims to enhance and innovate international education in the United States. It seeks to update and reauthorize Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965 by promoting global business programs, professional and technical education, and research innovation in international studies. The bill emphasizes interdisciplinary skills, language proficiency, and international studies to bolster the competitiveness of the United States in a global context.
General Summary of the Bill
This bill endeavors to advance global education by providing grants and support to educational institutions for developing international and foreign language programs. Among its significant provisions, it allows for both undergraduate and graduate students to engage in specialized foreign language studies relevant to their fields of expertise. It also seeks to foster research in international education, support innovative curriculum development, and create databases to assess educational capacity in relation to global needs.
Significant Issues
One of the major concerns regarding this bill is its open-ended authorization of appropriations. The provision allowing for "such sums as may be necessary" for funding leaves room for potentially unlimited spending, raising concerns about accountability and fiscal prudence. While this flexibility could be necessary for adapting to unforeseen needs, it also demands stringent oversight to prevent misuse.
Another significant challenge is the broad definition of "eligible grant recipients" in Section 3, which could inadvertently favor well-established institutions over new entrants. The term "innovative paradigms" also presents a problem due to its vagueness, opening the door to subjective interpretation and potential misuse of funds. Furthermore, by capping the Federal share for grants at 50% as mentioned in Section 5, the bill might unintentionally disadvantage institutions with fewer financial resources, thereby limiting their ability to participate.
Impact on the Public
The bill is likely to have a wide-reaching impact by fostering a more internationally competent educational workforce. It aims to prepare students for a globalized economy, which could enhance the nation's economic competitiveness. For the general public, this might mean more graduates who are well-versed in international affairs and languages, potentially enriching cultural diversity and international understanding within communities.
Impact on Stakeholders
Educational Institutions: Colleges and universities, especially those already established with international programs, may benefit from increased funding and resources. However, smaller and resource-constrained institutions might struggle to meet the matching fund requirements, limiting their participation.
Students and Educators: The bill could significantly benefit students and educators by expanding access to international programs and languages, increasing their global competency. Minority-serving institutions and community colleges may see an added advantage due to provisions allowing for waiver or reduction of matching fund requirements.
Private Sector and Nonprofits: By encouraging partnerships between educational institutions and private corporations or nonprofits, the bill aims to align educational outcomes with market needs, potentially leading to more robust connections between academia and industry.
In summary, while the bill presents ambitious goals for international education, it must address several critical issues to ensure equitable and effective implementation. Clear guidelines, adequate oversight, and a balanced approach to funding will be crucial for realizing the intended benefits while minimizing potential drawbacks.
Issues
The authorization of appropriations in Section 8 is open-ended, with 'such sums as may be necessary' for multiple fiscal years, leaving room for potentially unlimited spending without specific limits or oversight, which might concern taxpayers and fiscal conservatives.
Section 3 and Section 605 provide a broad definition for 'eligible grant recipient,' which could lead to favoritism towards established organizations that have already received federal grants, potentially hampering new entrants.
The language in Section 3, specifically 'innovative paradigms,' is vague and could lead to subjective interpretation, making it challenging to objectively assess proposals for funding, thus potentially leading to misuse of funds.
In Section 5, the Federal share for grants is capped at 50%, which might pose financial challenges for institutions unable to meet the match, particularly those with fewer resources, possibly limiting the pool of applicants.
Section 4 introduces terms like 'global study programs' without clear definitions, causing potential ambiguity in funding allocation and program implementation that stakeholders might find problematic.
The Secretary's discretion in Section 5 to determine the fields of study based on national needs could lead to favoritism or bias in grant distribution due to lack of a structured decision-making process.
Section 6's redesignation of paragraphs might cause administrative confusion if cross-references are not appropriately updated, leading to legal or implementation challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Advancing International and Foreign Language Education Act.”
2. Graduate and undergraduate language and area centers and programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965 allows graduate students to study foreign languages at the beginning, intermediate, or advanced levels if the language is related to their area of specialization.
3. International research and innovation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965 supports international and foreign language education by authorizing research and innovation projects. It details the eligibility for grants, their intended purposes such as studying education capacity and demand, creating innovative teaching strategies, and developing databases and other resources to improve global education within the US.
605. International research and innovation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section supports innovation and research projects in international and foreign language education to enhance the U.S. educational system's capacity to meet national needs. It outlines eligibility for grants, the types of projects allowed, and funding shared by federal and non-federal sources, while also emphasizing the importance of maintaining a public database and periodic reporting on project outcomes.
4. Global business and professional education programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to Part B of title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965 update various sections to emphasize the importance of global business and professional education programs. These changes highlight the need for skills in international and global areas within business and other professional communities, aiming to enhance awareness of internationalization and its relevance to the future economic welfare of the United States.
5. Professional and technical education for global competitiveness Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the Higher Education Act to promote global competitiveness by supporting programs that equip college students with international skills and knowledge. It offers grants to colleges and universities to integrate global perspectives into their curricula, develop foreign language proficiency, and create international partnerships and internships.
613. Professional and technical education for global competitiveness Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a program to enhance global professional and technical education for undergraduate and graduate students in the United States, focusing on interdisciplinary skills, language proficiency, and international studies to boost the country's competitiveness. Grants are awarded to eligible institutions, such as universities and partnerships with corporations, to support activities that incorporate global perspectives into curricula and provide opportunities for students and faculty to engage with international communities and industries.
6. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to redefine or add definitions for several terms, including "community college," "heritage student," and "minority-serving institution," to clarify their meanings within the context of the law.
7. Repeal of unfunded programs and duplicative requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes changes to the Higher Education Act of 1965, specifically removing part C, renaming part D as part C, and eliminating sections 637 and 638 to repeal unfunded programs and remove duplicate requirements.
8. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Higher Education Act of 1965 has been updated to allow for funding as needed to be provided for the fiscal year 2025 and the following five years, supporting the initiatives outlined in Title VI.
637. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
There is permission for the government to allocate the necessary funds for this title for the fiscal year 2025 and for the next five years.