Overview
Title
To enhance the preservation, maintenance, and management of national historic trails and national scenic trails, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9159 is a plan to help take care of special walking paths called trails that tell stories about history or take you through beautiful places. It lets certain groups help in taking care of these trails and work with other people, like volunteers, to make them nice and keep them safe.
Summary AI
H.R. 9159 aims to improve the preservation, maintenance, and management of national historic and scenic trails in the United States. The bill proposes the designation of specific partners like the Appalachian Trail Conservancy to help manage these trails. It also emphasizes collaboration with federal and non-federal entities, including community groups and volunteers, to enhance trail operations, conservation, and public engagement. Additionally, the bill outlines procedures for land and resource preservation, visitor impact assessments, and economic impact assessments on nearby communities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Appalachian Trail Centennial Act" aims to enhance the preservation, maintenance, and management of national historic trails and national scenic trails across the United States. These trails, which include the renowned Appalachian National Scenic Trail, are considered valuable landscape conservation tools that connect natural, scenic, historical, and cultural wonders. The bill emphasizes collaborative efforts between federal and non-federal partners to ensure these trails are developed and protected over time. By establishing guidelines for partnerships, including the designation of "Designated Operational Partners," the bill seeks to optimize the trails' management while fostering community engagement and volunteerism. The Act outlines procedures for cooperative management, establishing agreements, assessing visitation and economic impact, and authorizing necessary funding through 2030.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several concerns emerge from the bill's provisions, notably the lack of a transparent process for selecting Designated Operational Partners, which could lead to favoritism. Furthermore, the bill exempts certain committees and partners from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), raising potential transparency and oversight issues. The financial appropriations language is broad and undefined, potentially leading to unchecked spending. Additionally, allowing partners to seek funds from private entities might induce conflicts of interest. The definitions and roles laid out for administration, management, and operation within the bill seem complex and potentially overlapping, which could hinder effective implementation. Moreover, the ability for partners to accept or reject comprehensive plans without a clear dispute resolution process could lead to inconsistencies, and the proposed 20-year term for cooperative agreements might limit adaptability over time.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill represents a commitment to preserving and enhancing national trails, which might increase recreational and tourism opportunities. By fostering collaboration between federal agencies and local communities, these trails' natural and cultural resources may be more effectively maintained and accessible, offering a richer experience for visitors. However, potential issues around transparency and management might affect how efficiently these trails are run and how resources are allocated. Without clear financial constraints, there could be instances of wasteful spending, impacting taxpayers indirectly.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Agencies: The bill entrusts significant responsibility to federal bodies like the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture. These agencies must balance administration with cooperative management roles, potentially facing challenges if the Designated Operational Partners' selection lacks clear criteria or oversight.
Designated Operational Partners: These partners, likely non-profits or volunteer organizations, gain a substantial role in trail management, which can increase their influence and responsibility. However, without clear guidelines or accountability measures, these roles might lead to inefficiencies or disagreements with federal plans. Also, their capacity to accept funds from various sources may enhance their operational flexibility but could compromise their impartiality.
Local Communities and Volunteers: The bill encourages engagement from communities and volunteers, potentially boosting local economies through increased trail visitation. Gateway communities might benefit from tourism and related developments. However, if economic impact assessments are not standardized, these communities may experience unbalanced or inequitable development benefits.
Conclusion
While the "Appalachian Trail Centennial Act" holds promise for the improved management and preservation of national trails, several ambiguities and procedural gaps within the bill could hinder its effectiveness. Addressing the issues of transparency, accountability, and financial oversight will be crucial in ensuring the Act achieves its conservation and community engagement goals. Stakeholders must navigate these concerns to maximize the trails' potential benefits for all.
Issues
The bill allows the Secretary to designate entities as Designated Operational Partners without specifying a transparent process or criteria for selection, leading to potential favoritism (Section 4).
The exemption from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) for Designated Operational Partners and committees may result in a lack of transparency or oversight in managing cooperative management systems and other relevant activities (Sections 4(h) and 5(d)).
The language regarding financial appropriations is broad and open-ended, stating 'such sums as are necessary', which could lead to uncontrolled or wasteful spending without clear financial constraints or oversight mechanisms (Section 5(e)).
There is a potential conflict of interest concern due to provisions allowing Designated Operational Partners to seek and accept funds from private and public entities, which might affect their impartiality (Section 4(b)(5)).
The lack of specific accountability measures or oversight processes for entities involved in cooperative management or operation of covered trails could lead to management inefficiencies or issues (Section 3).
The definition of roles and responsibilities among administration, management, and operation is complex and may lead to confusion or overlap, potentially affecting the effective enforcement or application of the bill's provisions (Section 3).
The provision allowing Designated Operational Partners to accept or reject comprehensive plans might lead to inconsistencies or conflicts with federal plans, and there is no clear process for resolving disputes over rejections (Section 4(i)).
The language around cooperative agreements allowing for a term up to 20 years may be overly lengthy, potentially limiting the ability to adapt to changing circumstances over time (Section 4(b)(2)(A)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the official name of the Act is the “Appalachian Trail Centennial Act”.
2. Congressional declaration of policy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress emphasizes the importance of partnership and community involvement in conserving national historic and scenic trails, highlighting that these trails are developed collaboratively with federal and non-federal partners, particularly through the cooperative management model exemplified by the Appalachian National Scenic Trail. The policy states that while the Federal Government administers these trails, their operation involves shared responsibilities with designated partners, showcasing a joint effort to protect and develop these cherished natural and cultural resources.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms used in the bill related to managing and operating national historic and scenic trails. These terms include "administration," "comprehensive plan," "cooperative management," "covered trail," "designated operational partner," "gateway community," and roles of the "Secretary" and "Secretary concerned," among others, to clarify responsibilities and processes involved.
4. Establishing Designated Operational Partners for national historic trails and national scenic trails Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes guidelines for designating and working with organizations, known as Designated Operational Partners, to manage national historic and scenic trails. It covers criteria for designating partners, cooperation agreements, volunteer involvement, property rights protection, land preservation priorities, and partnership agreements, aiming to enhance trail management and ensure effective conservation and educational activities.
5. Improving covered trail planning and development Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines steps for improving planning and development of national trails, including assessing visitation and economic impact, fostering partnerships, and preparing reports for Congress. It also exempts related committees from certain rules and authorizes funding for these activities through 2030.