Overview
Title
To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey or lease certain parcels of land at Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro, Los Angeles, California, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill lets the Navy sell or rent some land in Los Angeles to the city for parks or other uses, but if the land isn't used as planned, it's given back to the government.
Summary AI
H.R. 9139 allows the Secretary of the Navy to sell or lease parts of land at the Defense Fuel Support Point in San Pedro, Los Angeles, to the cities of Los Angeles or Lomita for less than market value. This land includes areas known as the ballfields and a firing range, with plans for use as parks, recreational places, or for law enforcement. The city must cover costs related to the transfer, except for environmental cleanup, and the land must be used according to specific purposes outlined in the bill. If the land is not used as intended, it may revert back to the United States.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, identified as H.R. 9139, aims to grant the Secretary of the Navy the authority to convey or lease specific parcels of land located at the Defense Fuel Support Point in San Pedro, Los Angeles, California. The Secretary may transfer these lands to either the city of Los Angeles or the city of Lomita. These land transfers can be executed for purposes like park and recreational activities or for law enforcement purposes. Additionally, the bill allows for the Secretary to lease these lands on an interim basis, with specific financial and usage conditions attached to the conveyance.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the notable issues with the bill is that it allows the transfer of property at a price potentially below market value. This could translate into financial loss for the federal government and raises questions about the equitable valuation of public lands.
The provision for in-kind consideration, instead of straightforward financial compensation, is vague. It leaves room for ambiguity regarding what constitutes acceptable in-kind services or improvements. This ambiguity may lead to disputes over fair valuation or, worse, potential misuse of the system.
Another significant issue is the exclusion of prior screening requirements. Notably, the bill sidesteps the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act's regulations that ensure land is evaluated for its suitability for housing, especially for the homeless. This raises ethical and political concerns, as it may overlook opportunities to address homelessness.
Furthermore, the reversionary interest clause places a heavy reliance on the Secretary’s discretion to determine whether the land is being used appropriately. Without clear definitions and oversight, this could lead to governance challenges.
Finally, the complexity of the legal terminology and references to various codes and laws could make the bill difficult for the average person to understand, which might limit transparency and public engagement.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill’s potential to diminish federal revenue by offering lands at less than market value might impact resources available for other public services. Moreover, bypassing prior screening requirements could mean missed opportunities for community-focused initiatives, like addressing homelessness.
On a positive note, the transfer of land for park and recreational use could benefit local communities by providing more public spaces for leisure and recreation, potentially improving community well-being and quality of life.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For city authorities in Los Angeles and Lomita, this bill presents a valuable opportunity to acquire property at potentially reduced costs, enabling them to expand public facilities and services. This could greatly enhance their ability to develop recreational areas or bolster law enforcement facilities without significant financial outlay.
However, the stipulation that federal funds cannot be used to cover required payments might pose financial challenges for these cities, which will need to allocate their funds or in-kind resources for the transaction.
For the Secretary of the Navy and related federal entities, there is a balancing act between facilitating beneficial land use and ensuring that the terms do not disadvantage the federal government financially or operationally.
Overall, while the bill offers opportunities for local development and enhanced public spaces, it also presents risks related to fiscal responsibility and governance that need to be carefully managed.
Issues
The bill allows the Secretary of the Navy to convey property at a cost less than fair market value, potentially leading to a loss in revenue for the federal government. This issue is significant, as it may result in financial implications and questions about the equitable valuation of public assets. (Section 1(a), (e))
The provision for in-kind consideration is vague, lacking specificity on what constitutes acceptable services or improvements, which could lead to valuation disputes or potential abuses. This might raise concerns about transparency and fairness in the deal. (Section 1(d)(2), (e))
The exclusion of prior screening requirements under Section 2696(b) and the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act could bypass regulations intended to evaluate land use suitability, affecting housing programs for the homeless. This may be seen as ethically and politically significant. (Section 1(g))
The reversionary interest clause provides that the determination of whether the land is used appropriately is at the Secretary's discretion, which could lead to problems if there is a lack of oversight or if the terms are not clearly defined. This raises concerns about accountable governance. (Section 1(h))
Complex legal terminology and numerous references to United States Codes and public laws might make the document difficult to understand for laypeople, which may limit public engagement and transparency in the legislative process. This is a broader issue about accessibility of legal documents.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Land conveyance and authorization for interim lease, Defense Fuel Support Point San Pedro, Los Angeles, California Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Navy can transfer certain lands at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach in San Pedro, California, to the cities of Los Angeles or Lomita for park, recreation, or law enforcement purposes. The transfer can be at less than market value, must involve certain considerations from the recipient city, and retains conditions about use and potential reversion back to the U.S. government if the land is used improperly.